The Relationship between Industry Life Cycles, Competitive Strategy and Small Firm Performance (Case Study) Small Service Firms In Padang.

AftsmfurfuBeb}DeEo

!!A!t?l!tr.cAEa

fulEitqi&;q.d'@cF$gd@
iii.o'
b qqr sori d h* !&
e.ediie.brv
n!tu'emin
t-i.ritui qdlulbi tuu'b r@mni4Mh.

_'eF['dlollouPlisFdhghh
n M4 q 4prcrindt r e* d
-

!-4V

r7,6?%

d rE


'dd

bbr

nd

rtu ft rltrd

6y

.&ffi)drqe5u4soEdL&

*siq
i),c!
5

noet

MhnB ad


{er

E)

Disi4 (c)

cdndq

(rl

ud fod 3q6s (rt roEFtu'io4 w.Fio64 od

dk(rtrl)

H4rur^ (udsoor

A!

I b (r) sro {iri


- :4i

(DsPERrNDAoAMeio

hd4

5Ei*t6d{ri!'rtrma,
LeiE'hi(44haFm6qBioei

d4d!ldgis.!hs,h{.dlj

dFdE6i6dblqsd.rc4L[qnlci!Fo,!rd

:i!4

Ltre

oq r

sioit@it niwoes im


on*&ce4i6kdr',j
i6q v ht@ia ifr imrcbr

tuts^, vd

EYi&e

5

o). pp

r4rsL

saFws b6;qa

tu ft:ird.tu@Nd d'Nd
^@ir!

!i*.


"i

jr !sycb6s. ,(6) Dpjr
Rrdub M. , r^kb, !r, hri.(ree9
dtrftddii
inFddEdvab&aolingqaso odis

16

s(9dugbhdFfue.'
d 6.ldu5q L

r.Ar

c.\

c

hfuitr4EgtrJitr'@oqtidA M";-


sc de sb*s

soJ
he,r*$d*d*
Jx!;ti*4
crxD

)

or

B

Eea..Rh(lqlsnd]Bsoessh4rs'Ditrgol