BOARD CHARACTERISTICS AND FINANCIAL OF ISLAMIC BANK : THE CASE OF INDONESIA.

BOARD CHARACTERISTICS AND FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCtr OF ISLAMIC BANKS:

'

TEE CASE OF INDONESIA

THESIS
Subnitt

h Plriid ruuiIb..t of r[e Ratoltue For
Und.rsnd!.L Dc{re h Ecolonis

d

PUTRI LENGGOGEM
BP. 05 153 081

ACCOUNTINC DEPARTMENT

IACTILTY OF ECONOMICS


ABSTNlCT

This studr includcs

Indepdde

Tr*t

d

fttatib^hip beteeeh bod.t chata.tetinics

M fipb

ahd

Regesiow to akatyze

lnatuial p.tfotuance of Indonsian


hlauic BanlJ, sp..ifcall, .o6ilt of boud of cohnissioneE size,
indepen lence,

frcmial

[email protected] tetute, anl boad dge

p.4bme,

thtut

stt& ue rctun

6

itdepe"dekt tuiable.

on equity tu.l BOPO


6

bbdtd

ln neMe

efrciency /atio.

me result ihdi.ates thd geretullt thz boad choacte stics idisnil)cee

klrene

toedd lnarciol pethtuance of tndonesin Istanic bants accd.tina to

Melarid

beteeen

wiablet


in

nwe

Ketwords: board chuactqisti.s,

annissiohss

size, b@t

the

the

the

reladowhip k weqk

lrurcial pethrndc4 hlmic


bank\, boanl

af

! in4epehdeh.., b@d tenure, boar.t ase, retum on eqtity,

CTLAPTER

I

INTRODUCTION

Indonesia

Eur

Ajm

*6dceply aflectd bydre 1997


1998 cnses. morc

country. lls ec.nonric contnction wds deeper md

only one to crF.riencc

r

rhan.rhers

noft p.olo.ScJ, lllu

(temroralJ

kJss

ol macroccondnic conrot. dd

sn$


rhar

ils scnd$ econonic

sullercd-tsin cnsei, in tnc

problcns were acconpmicd b)r sochano s rcgime collaps.

atso

bd

financial

(HiI &

Shiashi,

2007). Thc recovery sas siowly Dd conplcx Focess, as ncw insirurjonslnd ro
be creakd-


Over rhe

od

old oncs rciomed undcr successive shortli!€d adninisrmrions

l.sl dccadc, much h6

becn discussed

sr.wLh on dic comin-r wnhjn r|c

Irmks tlay very

co

inp.ndr

or ho$ b


srimulalc cc.nonrjc

exl orar.pidt,v evotvins etob.teconoDy.

rule in thc cconomic life ot

$c narion.

l.bc

health of ihe econonic is closcl)' tuhred to thc somdDess ot its bekina sysrcnr.

Cruning

and lqbal

(200t),rsued rhaithc sro$rh inrermtional Jtnucjal marke$

md arat.r dilcuirr

eidcr

acccss

b

ol ljnlncial

tund. Banks have rcsp.nded 10 drc ncR chrltenges by going to

nestrcna so rh!l,Indoncsia
ro rccover) its

insrtumenls harc ptulided large bmks wjrh

is vcry

e4crroco!.crn in blnkiDs indusry inordcr

miion econonric life.


In dclcloFing eronomic Ero*rh. Indonesia ado|rs several s_r$ens ot
b.nkloe: there areconv.nrio.al slstm ard sh.ri! brnkins syslcnr. Ptuse.rtyrhcrc
are tu]I-flcdgcd

lrdon.sia {nh

lsl,mi!

the

R

vorldt

k, Shrn. Business Unirs

lareesr

dd

Sha.ia RLUxt

ppulation olMustims. h6 comc

b

Brk

Islrmic or

shai a ba&ine in rly lare Many of tndo.csi

ai

Musl im leadcs do no r beliele thar

codqurcial inlerest in ils nodm tirm is prohibilc4 althoush otieB do. Aner
sone

iale

finscill

sEns. lslmic

nNdtutions ,rc developing iapidl! rn,l

lhc cmhusidslic suppon of mdry youg pcopte aM ifictlecru.ls The

Shua Burcau of Bank ltu]o.esi, .lemonslntcs
panicul& pdls
banting

(

ol $e

ol

hlmic Beki.g

sh

ia balks

Lr

in siarji

baiknrs beconc

Du{ br sLep losdd

rs

, lerlq

inplcmenr corpoBte aov€rnmce .onceprul frdework. srudy by
I

i.a.cidl ScRice Boad (l|SB) launch ExposuE Dralt

golcmuce lbr Sh ia l,ind.ing rnsduion.

g.lenece

betwccn

obddienccb shdian

shfia rnd

nsll

th

conrcntional {ated

!t

Co4roratc govcmmcc sulprsed

iion

ro

Isldic

sood co4rdro

oi

co4,.,,re

sh&ja complimcc.

\t'heE6 Corpomrc (nivemdce Principlc rs w€ knorv

mor,lilri connibNn|

i.dependenr, beconc ifrporrbr pnncirJle at ,ctivny

corpomrions

.t

ditterence

as fairncss. tmspdency- lccountabiliry, rcsponsibility,

dd

tslanic

Derelopmenl in lndonesia cired in

c.rp.rare aoveaiancc

uncomplain ccnaimt Mororer,

*o& otdr

lndonesi4 cspccblty in

count.y, las co.sidedble unnret dcnmd

lhe Rluepn ol

Applicalions

dd

hiv.

rd

exjstcncc

to bc nnpLnenled in iBlitutions

.a

a

and

whole scctou. Altlbugh corporalc gov.rnsce is e$ential ro

dtc success of firms in nmy indust jes. lbe banlDg sector desencs specirl
atlenrion

(Ulll &

allocrlion

FC(jl, 2005). Thc bankine sccrtr is nainly respo.siht€

ol nlarcial rcsom.s r. all

orher

Jor rhe

seto6 ol m econonv vh.\.

etncicncr lcl-v much dermines the perfommce

.f

ihe

econonr]

CIIAPT!]R V
CONCLUSION

Tie precedins
povides conclusions

chaprer

h4 p@med lhe empiricat resuhs d lhh

dEw tiod lne findings d disusjons pented in rhe

previous chaprer, aollowed by sn Nessmenr
rhis srudy and possible

5,1

Rljgrch

ohapier

tutur diKrio.s tor

oflhe potential tinjrations

presenr in

research.

CorclusioDs

Tnk purpos of ihis rcscmh is ro get nrtislicat drb rhat shoss *helh$ bord

chmcknsiics which represent by Bor.d
IndepenCene,

Bodd'ltnuE,

findcial pdfomsce meau€

of

Commistone^, Sizc. Rosrd

d Lloard Age hale sigrificdr Etationship row&d

by ROE

dd

BOPO.

This Esqrch inrestigarB hypothces srates

lnlucnes
pedomance

L

fiar

there are insigninont

of thc boad chmck slic varirbl6 bwards
ol

lndonesjan

kthic

b.nkios finmcial

bank which gore6 five yer6 dar4 rhe r6utts

TheE is no significanl inlluence

Lretwccn Board

of

CommissioneB,

SiZ

tow$,1 finhcial peformance measure by ROE &d BOPO.

2. lhcrc is no

siSnificMr infllencc berween Board Independdce towtrd

lintucial p.riofrdce mesu€ by RO! ..d BOPO.

RFJFERENCES

AelRal, R., & rihion,

ltrfom

J.

. (19e9). Bank fim relaiioDships, financi're drd lim
hsret n, [c.nohti.s Lere^,7 2 l,aa 1),275)32.

ceincermoy

Andeson, R., Mansi, S.. & Rcsb. D (2004). Bodrd characcistics, accounlins rcpon
inresritv $d ihe cost ot debt. lta.t in Jotrnul ofAct.rntins ohd Lcono its,
37,3t5 312.

Alshlio

APEC Srud! CertE's Msaeing Rclulxtory ChmSe Prcg€m. (200.1).
Bn * Go\zrnance ?nnejplet dtl Balel 2: A lt.i P/u.tice Cui.le AAtxlia

Atrimrian srock Er.hdnse (7003) tSX Gti.lahce Note t0 Reriet oJ t)puot;o's
ahtl /lctitilie! - Listing Rule L l 0 I 7
liom htpr/*vw.dx.coor.au/ListinsRulcdeuiddce/GuidrceNoi€10 tdl.

Rx.n, t. (t99iJ. a.ryatot. B.dra! untl catparub Aorenon ?. Ne* York:
Bank ltulonesir. {2002) Th?

hlrctri"r .,f Hanic b.nkj"E rlerel.pnert

The

ih th.!.ne!ja

Btuking Slteryisian 1.2005). Enhan.i,S .nryorc|? Eorettun.t
ottthi.uti.^ Bank tbr lntemalional senlercnrs.

Lrasel Commntcc on

Jot

ta.kirt

r

Beasley. M. (1996).
cnDirical dalysis ol rhe Elarion beNccn rhe bad ol
direcror comFsitio0 lnd fm.ncial sarcm.nr liaud hswt iaAccourtjnxAsie\

Bciner, s . Dnbet- w , Schmid, F . & Zimnemann, H. (2003) h Board Sizc an
lndcpcndc r Corpoture G.vdmrce Mechanism?. Rclricvcd Ndvcmber lt.
2009, lrom hitp://papc6.sytr.com
Bcrger, P C, Otek. t., & Ycmack. D- L. (1997). Managerial cntrcnchmenl and
canihl structur lecisiors. /rxxdr h Joumul of Findn.e, 52 (1), 141 l -141a

AhaglE! S.,

& B. Black (1999). The uncertair

rclaiioNhip brllvecn blzd

composirion and rirnr p€dormsc.. Lsrcs in Bu:ihes. Laaret 5.1, 921 -963

Bhag[at, S., & B. Lllack (2001). Thc n.n core rlion bdwccn board indepenJence
and lon8'efln firm peraoana0cc .^:!ue! tn Jounktt oJCor\tuti.h kr,27.131