Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:A:Applied Animal Behaviour Science:Vol69.Issue2.Sept2000:
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69 Ž2000. 175–176
www.elsevier.comrlocaterapplanim
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Cereal aversion in behaviourally
resistant house mice in Birmingham, UK’’
wAppl. Anim. B. Sc. 66 ž2000/ 323–333x q
R.E. Humphries a,1, R.M. Sibly a,) , A.P. Meehan b
a
School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, UniÕersity of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ, UK
b
Research and DeÕelopment DiÕision, Rentokil Initial plc, Felcourt, East Grinstead,
West Sussex RH19 2JY, UK
Received 20 March 2000
The Publisher regrets that errors occurred in the above article. The correct affiliation
and contact details are as above and Fig. 3 appears overleaf.
q
PII of original article S0168-1591Ž99.00096-9
Corresponding author. Tel.: q44-118-931-8461; fax: q44-118-931-0180.
E-mail address: [email protected] ŽR.M. Sibly..
1
Now at: Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Leahurst,
Neston, CH64 7TE, UK.
)
0168-1591r00r$ - see front matter q 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 6 8 - 1 5 9 1 Ž 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 0 - 9
176
Erratum
Fig. 3. Consumption of the foods presented in the preference tests. Within each panel the amount taken by
WMBR mice is shown on the left Ždark bars., and that by BC mice on the right Žlight bars.. The panels in the
top row refer to Experiment 1, those in the middle and bottom rows to Experiments 2 and 3. Columns of
panels refer to days 1, 2 and 7. Units are grsite in Experiment 1, grpen in Experiments 2 and 3. Stars indicate
Mann–Whitney test p-values for differences between WMBR and BC sites: ) p- 0.05, ) ) p- 0.01, ) ) ) p0.001. Bars indicate standard errors of the means.
www.elsevier.comrlocaterapplanim
Erratum
Erratum to ‘‘Cereal aversion in behaviourally
resistant house mice in Birmingham, UK’’
wAppl. Anim. B. Sc. 66 ž2000/ 323–333x q
R.E. Humphries a,1, R.M. Sibly a,) , A.P. Meehan b
a
School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, UniÕersity of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ, UK
b
Research and DeÕelopment DiÕision, Rentokil Initial plc, Felcourt, East Grinstead,
West Sussex RH19 2JY, UK
Received 20 March 2000
The Publisher regrets that errors occurred in the above article. The correct affiliation
and contact details are as above and Fig. 3 appears overleaf.
q
PII of original article S0168-1591Ž99.00096-9
Corresponding author. Tel.: q44-118-931-8461; fax: q44-118-931-0180.
E-mail address: [email protected] ŽR.M. Sibly..
1
Now at: Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Leahurst,
Neston, CH64 7TE, UK.
)
0168-1591r00r$ - see front matter q 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 6 8 - 1 5 9 1 Ž 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 0 - 9
176
Erratum
Fig. 3. Consumption of the foods presented in the preference tests. Within each panel the amount taken by
WMBR mice is shown on the left Ždark bars., and that by BC mice on the right Žlight bars.. The panels in the
top row refer to Experiment 1, those in the middle and bottom rows to Experiments 2 and 3. Columns of
panels refer to days 1, 2 and 7. Units are grsite in Experiment 1, grpen in Experiments 2 and 3. Stars indicate
Mann–Whitney test p-values for differences between WMBR and BC sites: ) p- 0.05, ) ) p- 0.01, ) ) ) p0.001. Bars indicate standard errors of the means.