The comparison of alkanolamide and silane coupling agent on the properties of silica- filled natural rubber (SMR-L) compounds
Contents lists available at
Polymer Testing
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :
Material properties The comparison of alkanolamide and silane coupling agent on the properties of silica-filled natural rubber (SMR-L) compounds
- a Indra Surya , H. Ismail , A.R. Azura b
Department of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, University of Sumatera Utara, Medan, 20155, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal, 14300, Penang, Malaysia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history:
Alkanolamide (ALK) and Aminopropyltriethoxy Silane (APTES) were incorporated separately Received 20 May 2014
into silica-filled SMR-L compounds at 1.0, 3.0, 5.0 and 7.0 phr. It was found that compounds
Accepted 6 August 2014 with both ALK and APTES exhibited cure enhancement, better filler dispersion and greater
Available online 27 August 2014
rubber-filler interaction. Both additives also produced modulus and tensile enhancements in
the silica-filled SMR-L compounds, especially up to a 5.0 phr loading. At a similar loading, Keywords: ALK exhibited higher reinforcing efficiency of silica than APTES.
Alkanolamide
© 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Reinforcing efficiency APTES Silica-reinforcement Plasticiser
1. Introduction numerous silanol groups. The silanol groups are relatively incompatible with hydrocarbon rubbers, such as natural The mechanical properties such as tensile modulus, rubber and styrene butadiene rubber, therefore coupling tensile strength, tear and abrasion resistances of a rubber bonds are not formed. On the other hand, the silica parti- vulcanisate are enhanced as a result of the incorporation of cles have a strong tendency to interact with each other to form aggregates. Since the silica-hydrocarbon rubber reinforcing filler into the rubber compound. Carbon black interaction is weaker than the silica-silica interaction, the and silica are the best known reinforcing fillers, and have been widely utilised in the rubber industry. Each type of results are the formation of large agglomerates, poor reinforcing filler produces useful mechanical properties dispersion of silica and lower reinforcing efficiency. due to their specific surface chemistry. Carbon black and Modulus is a well-recognised criterion of filler rein- silica have apparently a dissimilar surface chemistry. The forcement Due to the nature of its surface chemistry, surface of carbon black is saturated with hydrocarbon silica has a low level of surface activity for rubber bonding, functional groups that react with sulphur during vulcani- resulting in small amounts of effectively immobilised rub- sation. They form sulphur bonds that link the rubber ber. Therefore, silica reinforced rubbers have lower chains, and also tie the carbon black to the rubber In modulus than carbon black reinforced rubbers.
marked contrast to the hydrocarbon functionality of carbon In order to overcome the deficiencies of silica, coupling black, silica does not react with sulphur. The surface of agents are used for the reinforcement of hydrocarbon silica is highly polar and hydrophilic due to the presence of rubbers. The most efficient and presently known coupling agent is organosilane . Organosilanes are reactive addi- tives. They are utilised to improve the silica-rubber inter-
Corresponding author. *
action of silica-filled rubbers and, consequently, enhance E-mail addresses: (H. Ismail).
0142-9418/© 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
q 1 is the initial angle of displacement (45 ), and q
), according to ISO 3417. Samples of the respective compounds were tested at 150 C. The com- pounds were subsequently compression-moulded using a stainless steel mould at 150
C, with a pressure of 10 MPa, based on respective curing times.
2.4. Tensile, hardness and resilience properties
Dumbbell-shaped samples were cut from the moulded sheets. Tensile tests were performed at a cross-head speed of 500mm/min using an Instron 3366 universal tensile machine, according to ISO 37. The tensile strength (TS), stress at 100% elongation (M100), stress at 300% elongation (M300) and elongation at break (EB) were determined. The hardness of the samples was measured according to ISO 7691-I, using a Shore A type manual durometer. The resil- ience was studied by utilising a Wallace Dunlop Trips- ometer, according to BS 903 Part A8. The rebound resilience was calculated according to Equation
% Resilience ¼ ½ð1 cos q 2 Þ=ð1 cos q 1 Þ 100 (1)
where
2 is the maximum rebound angle.
) and torque dif- ference (M
2.5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
The tensile fractured surfaces of the natural rubber compounds were examined by using a Zeiss Supra-35VP scanning electron microscope (SEM) to obtain informa- tion regarding the filler dispersion, and to detect the possible presence of micro-defects. The fractured pieces were coated with a layer of gold to eliminate electrostatic charge build-up during examination.
2.6. Measurement of rubberefiller interaction
The rubber-filler interaction was determined by swelling the cured silica-filled SMR-L compounds in toluene, according to ISO 1817. Test pieces with dimensions of 30mm 5mm 2mm were prepared from the moulded sheets. The initial weights were recorded prior to testing.
The test pieces were then immersed in toluene and conditioned at room temperature in a dark environment for 72 hours. After the conditioning period, the weights of the swollen test pieces were recorded. The swollen test
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of Alkanolamide and APTES.
H dM L
the reinforcing efficiency The organosilanes modify the surface of silica
The modified silica provides a
2.1. Materials
9 H
chemically active surface that can participate in vulcani- sation; providing coupling bonds between organosilane and both silica and rubber phases. There is much evidence confirming the existence of such bonds
. The coupling bonds were noted to mark improvements in the mechanical properties of the rubber-filled vulcanisates
In our previous work the preparation and appli- cation of Alkanolamide (ALK) in silica-filled natural rubber compounds were reported. The incorporation of ALK within silica-filled natural rubber compounds gave enhanced mechanical properties viz. tensile strength, ten- sile modulus and hardness. The enhancement of these properties was attributed to the improvement of silica dispersion in the rubber compounds, and higher crosslink density that stemmed from the incorporation of ALK. The results also indicated that ALK may function as an accel- erator and a plasticiser. In this study, the properties of silica-filled natural rubber compounds with ALK were compared with those of silica-filled natural rubber com- pounds with Aminopropyltriethoxy Silane (APTES). APTES is a type of organosilane. Similar to ALK, APTES also con- tains amine within its molecule, and its molecular structure is shown in
2. Experimental
Natural rubber grade SMR-L was obtained from Guthrie (M) Sdn. Bhd., Seremban, Malaysia. Other compounding ingredients such as sulphur, zinc oxide, stearic acid, N- isopropyl-N'-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (IPPD), benzo- thiazolyl disulfide (MBTS) and precipitated silica (grade VulcasileS) were supplied by Bayer Co. (M) Sdn. Bhd., Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. The APTES (C
23 NO
), cure time (t
3 Si)
was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. The ALK was synthesised in our laboratory using Refined Bleached Deodorized Palm Stearin (RBDPS) and diethanolamine. The reaction pro- cedures and molecular characterisations of the ALK were given in our previous report
2.2. Compounding
A semi-efficient vulcanisation system was applied for the compounding. The compounding procedure was per- formed on a two-roll mill (Model XK-160). dis- played the compound designation and formulation of silica-filled SMR-L compounds with ALK and APTES.
2.3. Cure characteristics
The cure characteristics of the silica-filled SMR-L com- pounds were obtained using a Monsanto Moving Die Rheometer (MDR 2000), which was employed to deter- mine the scorch time (ts
2
90
I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5 Sulphur
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.0 MBTS
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
2.0
30.0 ALK e e
Fig. 2. Scorch times (ts 2 ) and cure times (t 90 ) of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and APTES loadings.
7.0 a Parts per hundred parts of rubber.
5.0
3.0
1.0
7.0 e e e e APTES e e e e e e
5.0
3.0
1.0
30.0
1.5
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
1.5 Vulcasil-S e
1.5
2.0
and allowed to cool at room temperature for another 15 minutes before the final weights were recorded. The Lorenz and Park's equation
Consequently, zinc activity was reduced and the curing was retarded Compared to the control compound, the addition of ALK and APTES decreased the cure and scorch times of silica-filled SMR-L compounds. Both additives may be considered as co-curing agents since the polar parts of these additives reacted with the silanol groups of silica to transform the hydrophilic silica into hydrophobic silica; which interacted relatively less with zinc oxide. In this manner, the performance of zinc oxide in activating the accelerator was maximised. It was seen that the higher the loading of these additives, the lower the scorch and cure times. This was attributed to the amine-content of both additives. As presented in both chemicals contained accelerator activators, is an alkaline substance that in- creases the cure rate . Amine may also be utilised to overcome cure retardation problems in silica reinforcement
filler interaction became; resulting in lower viscosity of the compound. The incorporation of these additives into silica- filled SMR-L compounds reduced the filler-filler interac- tion, which led to a lower viscosity that enhanced the processability of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds.
value was used to measure the relative viscosity of a rubber compound . The lower the value, the weaker the filler-
and the
) decreased with increase of the loading of these additives. The minimum torque rep- resented the filler-filler inter agglomeration
L
silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and APTES loadings. The incorporation of 1.0 phr of these additives into silica-filled SMR-L compounds produced compounds with a higher torque difference, compared to the control compound. The addition of up to 5.0 phr of these additives increased the torque difference; however, it was decreased with further increase of these additives. It was also evident that the minimum torque (M
presents the torque difference (M H dM L ) of the
The scorch and cure times of ALK were longer than those of APTES. This was attributed to the concentration of amine in each of the additive molecules. From the molec- ular structures of the additives, as presented in it was seen that the mass fraction of amine in ALK was lower than that of APTES. Therefore, at a similar loading, ALK provided a lower concentration of amine than APTES.
.
It is well-known that the addition of a silica filler into a SMR-L compound (defined as the control compound) cau- ses cure retardation. Due to its high polarity, silica inter- acted with zinc oxide during curing and formed silica bound zinc, which was unable to activate the accelerator.
2.0
.
filled SMR-L compounds The effects of ALK and APTES on the scorch and cure times of silica-filled SMR-L compounds are shown in
3. Results and discussion
Q ¼ ½Swollen Dried weight=½Initial weight 100=Formula weight (3)
In this study, the weight of the toluene uptake per gram of hydrocarbon rubber (Q) was calculated based on Equa- tion
where, the subscripts f and g referred to filled and gum vulcanisates, respectively; z was the ratio by weight of filler to hydrocarbon rubber in the vulcanisate; while a and b were constants. The higher the Qf/Qg value, the weaker the rubber-filler interaction became.
þ b (2)
Qf=Qg ¼ ae z
was applied in this study. The swelling index was calculated according to Equation
Table 1 The compound designation and formulation of silica-filled SMR-L compounds with ALK and APTES.
Designation and composition of the SMR-L compound-based recipes Un-filled Control ALK1 ALK3 ALK5 ALK7 APTES1 APTES3 APTES5 APTES7
SMR-L 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
ZnO
5.0
2.0
2.0 IPPD
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0 Stearic acid
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.0
3.1. Effects of ALK and APTES on cure characteristics of silica-
I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
10.21
7.29
9.29
11.14
17.57
h r
Dispersion parameter Designation of the SMR-L compounds based recipes Control ALK1 ALK3 ALK5 ALK7 APTES1 APTES3 APTES5 APTES7
9.10 Table 3 The value of L for silica dispersion in SMR-L compounds.
10.94
9.48
13.57
9.16
11.09
10.75
9.51
9.11
4.81
0.33 M H eM L , dN.m
0.54
0.69
3.43
9.86
h r em r
2.78 Fig. 3. The L values of silica with ALK and APTES.
5.36
7.62
11.43
1.50
4.91
6.95
9.03
15.45
1.93 L ¼
7.71
2.35
2.33
2.14
1.93
2.38
2.34
2.11
2.12
4.71 m r
0.95
In theory, the torque difference may be used as an indication of the crosslink density of a rubber compound
0.51
3.2. Effects of ALK and APTES on the silica dispersion
Lg
Hf
and M
Lf
]; where M
Hg
/M
r ¼ [M Hf
], and m
r ¼ [M Lf
/M
Hg
where: h
L ¼ h r m r (4)
.
The degree of silica dispersion, with or without the addition of ALK and APTES in the SMR-L phase, was determined quantitatively by Equation
The reduction of the torque difference after the 5.0 phr of ALK and APTES loading was most probably attributed to the dilution effect of excessive amounts of additives, which lowered the crosslink density.
The addition of up to 5.0 phr of these additives into the silica-filled SMR-L compounds increased the tor- que difference of the SMR-L compounds. This was clearly attributed to the actions of these additives. As previously mentioned, the hydrophobic silica (due to the incorpora- tion of ALK and APTES) maintained the performance of zinc oxide in activating the MBTS, which accelerated the sulphur reaction and enhanced the state of the sulphide crosslink. The more hydrophobic silica became, the more compatible it was to SMR-L. As a consequence, the addition of these additives not only reduced the filler-filler interac- tion, but also enhanced the rubber-filler interaction; lead- ing to the formation of coupling bonds between the additives with both silica and SMR-L. These coupling bonds were considered to be another type of crosslink, which contributed to the total crosslinks of silica-filled SMR-L compounds.
The greater the torque difference value, the higher the crosslink density. The total crosslink density was contributed by sulphide crosslinks and physical crosslinks
were the minimum and the maximum torques of the filled compounds; and M Lg and M
were the minimum and the maximum torques of the unfilled/gum SMR-L compound. From , M
0.65
11.40
0.78
1.23
0.07
9.43 M L , dN.m
11.48
10.90
10.43
9.40
11.60
10.29
Lg
10.34
4.88
Cure characteristics Designation of the SMR-L compounds based recipes Un-filled Control ALK1 ALK3 ALK5 ALK7 APTES1 APTES3 APTES5 APTES7 M H , dN.m
Table 2 Torque differences of silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and APTES loadings.
The comparison of the L value of ALK with that of APTES is presented in . It is seen that at a similar loading, ALK caused a lower L value of silica in the SMR-L compound. This was attributed to the additional function of ALK as an internal plasticiser, which caused the reduc- tion of the filler-filler interaction to lead to a better filler dispersion compared to APTES. This explanation was in line with the data in . At a similar loading, the minimum torque (M L ) of ALK was lower than that of APTES.
Consequently, the dispersion of silica in the SMR-L com- pounds became poor. The addition of ALK and APTES at 1.0 phr into the silica-filled SMR-L compounds lowered the value of L. This was clearly due to the polar parts of these additive molecules that had a strong interaction with silica, which transformed the filler into a hydrophobic one. Consequently, silica became more compatible with SMR-L; hence improving the dispersion. The higher the loading of the additives, the lower the value of L; which meant enhanced silica dispersion.
¼ 4.88. The lower the value of L at a particular silica loading, the better The value of L for the silica dispersion in the SMR-L phase is presented in It is seen that the value of L of the silica dispersion in the rubber phase of the control compound was the highest. This was attributed to the surface of silica, which was saturated with hydrophilic silanol groups, and its relatively weak interaction with SMR-L. The silica particles also had a strong tendency to interact with each other and form large agglomerates .
Hg
¼ 0.07 and M
0.24
I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
, the enhancement of tensile modulus to 5.0 phr was attributed to a higher crosslink density due to the formation of coupling bonds between the additives and both silica and SMR-L. The coupling bonds were another type of crosslink
As presented in ALK and APTES, with various loading, increased the RE of silica on the SMR-L. This is associated with the function of the additives as surface modifiers of silica that improved its compatibility with SMR-L; hence, improving the dispersion and rubber-filler interaction.
At a similar loading, ALK caused a higher RE of silica. This was due to better dispersion of silica and a stronger interaction of SMR-Lesilica in the presence of ALK as compared to APTES. This explanation is in agreement with the results in .
3.5. Effects of ALK and APTES on mechanical properties
The effects of ALK and APTES on the M100, M300, hardness, EB, resilience and TS of silica-filled SMR-L com- pounds are shown in respectively. The incorporation of up to 5.0 phr of ALK and APTES into the silica-filled SMR-L compounds increased the tensile modulus (M100 and M300), but modulus decreased with further increase in the loadings. The results of hardness, tensile strength and resilience also exhibited a similar trend.
Since the tensile modulus of a rubber vulcanisate is only dependent on the degree of crosslinking
which contributed to the total crosslink density of the
High RE meant a high rubber-filler interaction, which was influenced by the degree of filler dispersion. Enhanced filler dispersion provided a greater surface area for rubber-
SMR-L compounds. Therefore, with the addition of the additives, their effects were the same as an increase in crosslink density. This explanation is in line with the results in
The silica-filled SMR-L compounds with addi- tives had a higher value of (M
H
M
L ) than the silica-filled vulcanisate without additives (control compound).
The deterioration of the tensile modulus beyond 5.0 phr was attributed to the excessive loading of these additives, which caused a lower crosslink density. Presumably, the excessive amounts of these additives formed boundary layers which dissolved and coated part of the elemental curatives and silica particles, leading to decreased
Fig. 4. The Qf/Qg values of silica with ALK and APTES.
filler interactions. RE of silica on SMR-L, due to the addition of ALK and APTES into the silica-filled SMR-L compounds, is shown in .
3.3. Effects of ALK and APTES on rubberefiller interactions
The rubber-filler interaction depends on the degree of the filler dispersion in the rubber phase. Better filler dispersion results in stronger rubber-filler interactions. The rubber-filler interaction, with the addition of ALK and APTES to the silica-filled compound (based on the Lorenz and Park's equation), is presented in
=ðM H M L g
It is shown that Qf/Qg decreased with increase of the ALK and APTES loading, up to 5.0 phr, and then increased with further increase to the loading. The decrease in Qf/Qg indicated that the SMR-Lesilica interactions became stronger with the addition of ALK and APTES. This was attributed to the ability of these additives to chemically modify the surface of silica, which was then more compatible with SMR-L; hence, improving the wetting/ dispersion of silica and, consequently, improving the SMR- Lesilica interaction. This explanation is in agreement with .
The increase of Qf/Qg after 5.0 phr loading was probably largely due to the excessive loading forming a layer in the silica-filled SMR-L system. The layer absorbed, coated and trapped the silica reducing the rubber-filler interaction.
At a similar loading, the Qf/Qg values of ALK were lower than those of APTES. Again, this was attributed to the additional function of ALK as an internal plasticiser, which caused better filler dispersion and led to a stronger rubber- filler interaction.
3.4. Effects of ALK and APTES on reinforcing efficiency of silica
The degree of reinforcement provided by the filler was calculated through its reinforcing efficiency (RE), which in its simplest form is given by Equation .
RE ¼ ðM H M L f
ðM H M L g
(5)
g
in which: (M
H eM L
)
f ¼ difference in torque value of filled compound
(M
H eM L
)
¼ difference in torque value of un filled/gum compound
I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
Fig. 6. Modulus at 100% of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK Fig. 9. Elongation at break of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various and APTES loadings.
ALK and APTES loadings.
ALK. The ALK lowered the viscosity of the silica-filled SMR- L compound, which led to better filler dispersion and greater rubber-filler interaction. M300 displayed the de-
. This explanation gree of rubber-filler interactions is in line with the data in which demonstrated that the Qf/Qg values of ALK were lower than those of APTES.
As presented in hardness showed a similar behaviour as M100, which displayed the stiffness of a rubber vulcanisate The
enhancement of hardness up to 5.0 phr was attributed to a higher crosslink density, and the deterioration of hardness beyond 5.0 phr was attributed to a lower crosslink density.
Fig. 7. Modulus at 300% of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK
At a similar loading, the hardness of ALK was lower than and APTES loadings. that of APTES. This was due to the plasticising effect of ALK, which softened the silica-filled SMR-L vulcanisates. formation of both sulphide and coupling bond crosslinks.
elongation at break (EB) of the silica-filled SMR-L com- As presented in at a similar loading, ALK pounds. As seen, APTES reduced the EB of silica-filled SMR- caused a decrease in M100 and an increase in M300,
L vulcanisate up to 5.0 phr of loading, and then increased compared to the silica-filled SMR-L compounds with slightly it as the loading further increased. EB depends
APTES. A decrease in M100 was attributed to the plasti- mostly on the degree of crosslink density . The reduc- cising effect of ALK, which modified the modulus/stiffness tion of the EB up to 5.0 phr was simply attributed to a property. A plasticiser may be used, not only to improve the higher crosslink density, which immobilised the SMR-L rubber compound processing, but also to modify physical segments from the silica surface. The increase of EB properties (such as stiffness and flexibility) of a rubber beyond 5.0 phr was attributed to a lower crosslink density. vulcanisate .
A contrary result was obtained when ALK was utilised. An increase in M300 was attributed to a stronger
The EB increased with the increasing of ALK loadings. This rubber-filler interaction due to the plasticising effect of was attributed to the function of ALK as an internal
Fig. 8. Hardness of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and Fig. 10. Resilience of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and
APTES loadings. APTES loadings.I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
Fig. 11. Tensile strength of silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and APTES loadings.
3. At a similar loading, alkanolamide indicated a higher degree of silica dispersion, greater silicaenatural rubber interaction and higher reinforcing efficiency than ami-
2. A 5.0 phr loading of alkanolamide and amino- propyltriethoxy silane (APTES) was the optimum loading to improve the properties of silica-filled natural rubber compounds.
1. Alkanolamide and aminopropyltriethoxy silane (APTES) acted as co-curing additives in silica-filled natural rub- ber compounds. Both of the additives increased the cure rate and torque difference.
4. Conclusions From this study, the following conclusions were drawn:
However, the matrix tearing lines and surfaces rough- ness of (d) and (g) were smoother than those of (c) and (f), which indicated lower crosslink densities.
who reported that an increase in rupture energy was responsible for the roughness and matrix tearing line of the fractured surface.
The SEM micrograph of (a) also seemed relatively smooth compared to the others, which indicated that (a) was less ductile than the others. However, the SEM micrograph for (c) exhibited a comparable matrix tearing line and surface roughness with (f). Both (c) and (f) pre- sented the greatest matrix tearing line and surface roughness compared to the others (b, d, e and g). A greater rubber-filler interaction in both (c) and (f) altered the crack path, which led to increased resistance to crack propagation that caused an increase in tensile modulus, tensile strength and hardness. The micrographs of the tensile fractured surfaces were in mutual agreement with the results in which illustrated that the Qf/Qg values of ALK-5 and APTES-5 were the lowest ones. An enhancement in rupture energy, due to a greater rubber- filler interaction, was responsible for the roughness and matrix tearing line of the fractured surface. The micro- graphs of the tensile fractured surfaces were in mutual agreement with the results obtained by other researchers
plasticiser, which modified the flexibility of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds. As an internal plasticiser, ALK provided a free volume that allowed increased mobility/flexibility for the rubber chains to move.
displays the effects of ALK and APTES on the
3.6. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study
At a similar loading, ALK produced a higher tensile strength than APTES. This may be attributed to a higher reinforcing efficiency of ALK due, for example, to better filler dispersion and greater rubber-filler interaction. Ac- cording to Cohan higher breaking elongation tends to give higher tensile strength. A higher EB meant a higher strain at break of the silica-filled SMR-L vulcanisate; which was delayed until a larger strain.
The greater the physical crosslinks, the higher the reinforcing efficiency of the filler, and a higher tensile strength is produced.
illustrates the tensile strength of silica-filled SMR-L compounds at various ALK and APTES loadings. The tensile strength enhancement was attributed to the ability of ALK and APTES to improve the silicaeSMR-L in- teractions. The silica surface was saturated with hydro- philic silanol groups, which were relatively incompatible with SMR-L, and its interaction with SMR-L was relatively low. Both the silane coupling agent may chemically modify the surface of silica, and transform it into hydrophobic silica. This additive-modified silica was more compatible with SMR-L; as a result, the improved wetting/dispersion and the improved silicaeSMR-L inter- action led to the formation of physical crosslinks. These physical crosslinks further contributed to the total crosslink density
At a similar loading, the resiliencies of ALK were higher than those of APTES. Again, this was attributed to the plasticising effect of ALK, which caused a higher crosslink density and a higher EB (more flexibility).
ALK presented a similar trend as APTES with loading up to 5.0 phr; however, beyond 5.0 phr, the ALK displayed a further increase in resilience. Again, this was attributed to the plasticising effect of the ALK, which improved the flexibility of the silica-filled SMR compounds. According to Hofmann , rebound resilience not only depends on the degree of crosslinks, but also on the flexibility of the rubber chains. The more flex- ible the rubber chains, the higher the resilience. The excessive amount of ALK (7.0 phr) caused a more flexible silica-filled SMR chains.
Like tensile modulus and hardness, resilience also de- pends on the number of crosslinks . The enhance- ment of resilience up to 5.0 phr was attributed to a higher crosslink density, and the deterioration of resilience beyond 5.0 phr was attributed to a lower crosslink density.
resilience of the silica-filled SMR-L compounds. It shows that APTES increased the resilience of silica-filled SMR-L compounds up to 5.0 phr of loading, and then decreased it as the loading further increased.
The SEM micrographs in demonstrate the frac- tured surfaces of silica-filled SMR-L compounds with ALK and APTES at a magnification of 200X. The micrographs showed the improvement of the silica dispersion due to the addition of ALK and APTES. The dispersion of the filler was the least homogeneous in (a), where large silica ag- glomerates were observed (indicated by arrows in
I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
Fig. 12. SEM micrographs of the failed fracture of silica-filled vulcanisate at a magnification of 500x: (a) Control, (b) ALK3, (c) ALK5, (d) ALK7, (e) APTES3, (f)
APTES5, and (g) APTES7.I. Surya et al. / Polymer Testing 40 (2014) 24e32
[33] .
[25]
.
[26]
.
[27]
.
[28] .
[29]
[30]
. [31]
[32]
[34] . [35]
. [24]
.
[36]
[37]
. [38]
[39] [40]
[41]
.
[42]
. [43]
.
Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains
Malaysia for providing the research facilities for carrying out the experiment and for making this research work possible. One of the authors (Indra Surya) is grateful to the Directorate General of Higher Education (DIKTI), Ministry of Education and Culture (Kemdikbud) of the Republic of Indonesia, for the award of a scholarship under the fifth batch of the Overseas Postgraduate Scholarship Program.
.
References
[1]
[2]
. [3]
[4] .
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
. [11]
. [12]
[13] .
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18] .
[19]
[20]
.
[21]
. [22]
[23]