Corina Penulisan naskah ilmiah utk publikasi di jurnal 2017
Best practice to publish
your research
1
C O R I N A D. S. R I A N T O P U T R A
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Teachings (selected)
2
Universitas Indonesia:
Academic writing for doctoral students
Thesis proposal for master students.
Scale construction and report writing for bachelor –
KKI students.
Industrial / Organizational Psychology for bachelor
students.
University of New South Wales:
Management of Organizational Behavior
Cross cultural management
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Publications (selected)
3
Riantoputra, C. D., & Gatari, E., (in press). Women Leaders in Indonesia: Current
Pictures and Strategies for Improvement, Y. Cho, R, Gosh, J. Sun, & G. Clean, (eds.),
Asian Women in Leadership, Palgrave Macmilan.
Riantoputra, C. D., Bastaman, A., & Duarsa, H. C. (in press), Positive identity as a
leader in Indonesia: It is your trait that count, not your gender., in Visions from
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Proceeding of the Asia-Pacific Research in Social
Sciences and Humanities, Depok – Indonesia.
Riantoputra, Corina D., Pamungkas, C.A., & Respati, A. (2013). The relationship
between perceived contract breach and job insecurity: The role of perceived
organizational support as a moderator. Paper presented at the European Association of
Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Munster Germany, 22nd – 25th May.
Note: This conference is an A class conference in Organizational Behavior.
Munawaroh, Azizatul, Riantoputra, Corina D., & Marpaung, Sally B. (2013). Factors
influencing individual performance in an Indonesian Government Office., South East
Asian Journal of Management, vol 7 (2), 51-60.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Publications (selected)
4
Riantoputra,
C. D., (2011). When you think you’re smart, you’re dead:
Resiliency and Learning. Paper presented at the Psychology EXPO:
Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan
Perubahan, Jakarta, 20 Sept.
Riantoputra,
C. D., (2011). Different paths to understanding: How intuitive
and analytic thinking affect executive’s interpretation. Paper presented at the
Cognition in the Rough, the Academy of Management Meeting, San Antonio,
Texas, 12th – 16th August.
Note: This is a top conference in Organizational Behavior.
Riantoputra,
C. D., (2010). Know thyself: Examining factors that influence
the activation of organizational identity concepts in top managers’ minds,
Group & Organization Management, 35, 8-38.
Note: This journal is an A class international journal for Applied
Psychology (IF: 2.4). The paper is one of the top three most down-loaded
papers published by Sage in 2009 / 2010 (see
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/download-09-10.htm#mana )
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
5
Academy of Management Scholars
Association
European Association of Work &
Organizational Psychology.
International Leadership Association
Chief Editor: Makara: HUBS Asia
www.hubsasia.ui.ac.id
Internasional jurnal terindex Thompson Reuters (ESCI)
Jurnal nasional terakreditasi - Diknas
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Key ingredients to publish your
research
6
SIGNIFICANCE
SUBSTANCE
CRAFTMANSHI
P
ATTITUDES
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
SIGNIFICANCE
7
Artikel yang baik, berciri:
Menghadirkan sesuatu yang baru, inovatif
dan/atau kreatif.
Artinya, artikel yang baik adalah artikel yang
berhasil berargumen bahwa (1) masalah
penelitiannya penting untuk diketahui dan (2)
sejauh ini, teori belum berhasil menjelaskan
dengan baik masalah penelitian tsb.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Significance - latihan
8
Apakah ini topik riset yang layak diteliti /
dipublikasi?
Bullying di SMP N di kecamatan Bojong Gede.
Sikap polisi terhadap suap
Perlawanan masyarakat Riau terhadap perusahaan
minyak.
Gaya kepemimpinan CEO bank
Bagaimana membuat topik-topik ini layak diteliti /
dipublikasi?
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
SIGNIFICANCE:
27
Apakah masalah berikut layak untuk diteliti?
Mengapa frekuensi terjadinya bullying di
SMP N di kecamatan Bojong Gede 5 kali
lipat dari SMP lain?
Bagaimanakah meningkatkan sikap tegas
polisi terhadap usaha suap dari
masyarakat?
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Significance - latihan
28
Berdasarkan kriteria berikut:
Apakah problem yang ingin dijawab?
Apakah problem tsb penting untuk dijawab?
Apakah sudah ada riset sebelum ini?
Apakah sudah ada teori yang bisa menjelaskan?
Apa bedanya gejala yang ingin diteliti, dengan teori yang sudah
ada?
Apakah ini topik riset yang layak diteliti?
Bullying di SMP N di kecamatan saya.
Sikap polisi terhadap suap
Perlawanan masyarakat Riau terhadap perusahaan minyak
Gaya kepemimpinan CEO bank
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Substance: literature review
29
Integrasikan & sintesakan literatur reviu
Integrasikan hasil dari literature reviu.
Temukan BIG PICTURE-nya.
Identifikasi variabel-nya (faktor yang mempengaruhi,
konteks, dst)
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
SUBSTANCE
33
Metode
Sampel?
Alat ukur?
Wawancara: berapa orang, protokol wawancara, hasil
wawancara, dst.
Kuesioner: definisi variabel, indikator perilaku, validitas,
reliabilitas, dst.
Teknik analisa?
Bias?
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP
35
Ikuti author guideline jurnal yang dituju
Jurnal Makara: HUBS-Asia hubsasia.ui.ac.id
Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP
36
Introduction:
The introduction is CRITICAL
It should be interesting
consist of:
1. Opening statements:
2. Review on previous studies
3. Research Question
4. Potential contributions
5. Study overview
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Opening statements:
Phenomena: (1) data; (2) examples
A discussion about people and their behaviours, not
about psychologists and their research.
The occurrence of violence against women has
increased dramatically in the past 10 years (BPS,
2012)
Quotes
STOP &THINK
How do Richins and Dawson (1992) open their article?
Corina_Academic Writing_2014
CRAFTMANSHIP
38
Convey complex thoughts and ideas as
simply as you can.
One idea per sentence.
Each sentence has a Subject & Predicate
One main idea per paragraph.
One paragraph consists of 4-7 sentences.
Concrete examples
Provide evidence to your ideas.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP
39
CONCISE
Focus on directly relevant materials.
We (Asian) have a tendency to digress, or discuss the context far too
long.
Differentiate thinking stage and writing stage.
Usually only the last 2-3 pages of student’s introduction section is
relevant.
Ask yourself:
Is this paragraph, sentence or word necessary?
Ask others:
Have 2 – 3 people read and comment your paper before submit it.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP – penulisan
kebaruan
40
(1) Jelas, spesifik, dan langsung ke sasaran.
Topik penelitian ini penting diketahui karena ….
Artikel ini berkontribusi terhadap teori pendidikan
dengan menunjukkan bahwa …
Artikel ini akan menjembatani perdebatan yang ada
dengan cara ….
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP – penulisan
kebaruan
41
(2) Kata-kata “Belum pernah dilakukan
sebelumnya” adalah kalimat yang tidak jelas, dan
belum tentu menunjukkan bahwa artikel tersebut
secara substantif menghadirkan pengetahuan
yang penting bagi masyarakat akademis.
(3): Topik penelitian yang penting untuk
diketahui dan, secara teoritis, belum diketahui
hanya dapat ditemukan melalui kajian pustaka
yang berbobot.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Menentukan outlet publikasi
43
Presentasi di Konferensi
Doctoral colloquium
Workshop on research methods, etc.
Proceeding
Jurnal nasional
Jurnal internasional : good, poor, predatory
Newspapers / books / social media
Outlet mana yang dipilih: tergantung
tujuannya.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Type of International Journal
44
Predatory/Vanity
Poor Journal
Good Journal
Links
http://scholarlyoa.com/
http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/
http://go.thomsonreuters.com/jcr/
http://anti-plagiarism-org.blogspot.com/
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Predatory
Poor
Good
Scope
Too broad
Specific
Specific
Name / Title
The name does
not reflect its
origin.
Has clear origin
Has clear origin
Editorial board
& Reviewers
No link to
academic
institution
Clear Link to
academic
institution
Clear Link to
academic
institution
Academic
expertise of
editorial board
No evident
Clear
Acceptable Hindex
Clear
Good H-index
Trustworthy
Review process
No, or
extremely
limited
Limited
Thorough,
double blind
review
Indexed in
Usually N/A
Indexed in TR /
Scopus
Indexed in TR /
Scopus
Impact Factor
Falsely claims to No IF
have IF (e.g.,
view factor)
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
45
Good IF
The Impact Factor
46
The impact factor (IF) of an
academic journal is a measure reflecting the
average number of citations to recent articles
published in the journal.
It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative
importance of a journal within its field, with journals
with higher impact factors deemed to be more
important than those with lower ones.
The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the
founder of the Institute for Scientific Information.
Impact factors are calculated yearly for those journals
that are indexed in the Journal Citation Reports.
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Contoh
47
the calculation is made every two years
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, IF: 21.952.
In 2010,
citation of articles published in 2009: 178;
citations of articles published in 2008: 283;
Total: 461
The number of articles published is 21 (2009 = 9; 2008=
12).
The impact factor is thus: 461 / 21 = 21.952.
Each article in BEHAV BRAIN SCI is thus (on the
average) 22 times cited in the past two years.
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Differences between Rank
48
Thomson Google
-Reuters Scholar
Microsoft
Academic
Search
Behavioral and Brain
Sciences
1
>20
21
Annual review of Psychology
2
6
11
Psychological Bulletin
3
3
1
Trends in cognitive sciences
5
1
13
Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology
18
2
3
Psychological Review
6
8
2
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Menentukan Jurnal Target
49
Relevance
Quality of the journal
Review Process
Frequency of publication
Open access
http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
ATTITUDES during the process of publication
50
HARGAI :
PANTANG MUNDUR
1. Rendah hati
1. Percaya diri
2. Baca keputusan / input
dengan hati-hati
2. (hampir) semua
artikel selalu harus
memperbaik
tulisannya.
3. Ingat bahwa input itulah
yang menyebabkan kita
maju.
4. Responi setiap input
dengan komprehensif .
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
3. Terus berjuang
ATTITUDE - S O P - writing for int’l
journal
51
S
Set specific time to read &
write
O
One step at a time
P
Persevere
Professional Development
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Terimakasih
c.riantoputra@gmail.com
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
52
your research
1
C O R I N A D. S. R I A N T O P U T R A
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Teachings (selected)
2
Universitas Indonesia:
Academic writing for doctoral students
Thesis proposal for master students.
Scale construction and report writing for bachelor –
KKI students.
Industrial / Organizational Psychology for bachelor
students.
University of New South Wales:
Management of Organizational Behavior
Cross cultural management
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Publications (selected)
3
Riantoputra, C. D., & Gatari, E., (in press). Women Leaders in Indonesia: Current
Pictures and Strategies for Improvement, Y. Cho, R, Gosh, J. Sun, & G. Clean, (eds.),
Asian Women in Leadership, Palgrave Macmilan.
Riantoputra, C. D., Bastaman, A., & Duarsa, H. C. (in press), Positive identity as a
leader in Indonesia: It is your trait that count, not your gender., in Visions from
Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Proceeding of the Asia-Pacific Research in Social
Sciences and Humanities, Depok – Indonesia.
Riantoputra, Corina D., Pamungkas, C.A., & Respati, A. (2013). The relationship
between perceived contract breach and job insecurity: The role of perceived
organizational support as a moderator. Paper presented at the European Association of
Work and Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), Munster Germany, 22nd – 25th May.
Note: This conference is an A class conference in Organizational Behavior.
Munawaroh, Azizatul, Riantoputra, Corina D., & Marpaung, Sally B. (2013). Factors
influencing individual performance in an Indonesian Government Office., South East
Asian Journal of Management, vol 7 (2), 51-60.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Publications (selected)
4
Riantoputra,
C. D., (2011). When you think you’re smart, you’re dead:
Resiliency and Learning. Paper presented at the Psychology EXPO:
Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan
Perubahan, Jakarta, 20 Sept.
Riantoputra,
C. D., (2011). Different paths to understanding: How intuitive
and analytic thinking affect executive’s interpretation. Paper presented at the
Cognition in the Rough, the Academy of Management Meeting, San Antonio,
Texas, 12th – 16th August.
Note: This is a top conference in Organizational Behavior.
Riantoputra,
C. D., (2010). Know thyself: Examining factors that influence
the activation of organizational identity concepts in top managers’ minds,
Group & Organization Management, 35, 8-38.
Note: This journal is an A class international journal for Applied
Psychology (IF: 2.4). The paper is one of the top three most down-loaded
papers published by Sage in 2009 / 2010 (see
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/download-09-10.htm#mana )
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
5
Academy of Management Scholars
Association
European Association of Work &
Organizational Psychology.
International Leadership Association
Chief Editor: Makara: HUBS Asia
www.hubsasia.ui.ac.id
Internasional jurnal terindex Thompson Reuters (ESCI)
Jurnal nasional terakreditasi - Diknas
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Key ingredients to publish your
research
6
SIGNIFICANCE
SUBSTANCE
CRAFTMANSHI
P
ATTITUDES
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
SIGNIFICANCE
7
Artikel yang baik, berciri:
Menghadirkan sesuatu yang baru, inovatif
dan/atau kreatif.
Artinya, artikel yang baik adalah artikel yang
berhasil berargumen bahwa (1) masalah
penelitiannya penting untuk diketahui dan (2)
sejauh ini, teori belum berhasil menjelaskan
dengan baik masalah penelitian tsb.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Significance - latihan
8
Apakah ini topik riset yang layak diteliti /
dipublikasi?
Bullying di SMP N di kecamatan Bojong Gede.
Sikap polisi terhadap suap
Perlawanan masyarakat Riau terhadap perusahaan
minyak.
Gaya kepemimpinan CEO bank
Bagaimana membuat topik-topik ini layak diteliti /
dipublikasi?
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
SIGNIFICANCE:
27
Apakah masalah berikut layak untuk diteliti?
Mengapa frekuensi terjadinya bullying di
SMP N di kecamatan Bojong Gede 5 kali
lipat dari SMP lain?
Bagaimanakah meningkatkan sikap tegas
polisi terhadap usaha suap dari
masyarakat?
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Significance - latihan
28
Berdasarkan kriteria berikut:
Apakah problem yang ingin dijawab?
Apakah problem tsb penting untuk dijawab?
Apakah sudah ada riset sebelum ini?
Apakah sudah ada teori yang bisa menjelaskan?
Apa bedanya gejala yang ingin diteliti, dengan teori yang sudah
ada?
Apakah ini topik riset yang layak diteliti?
Bullying di SMP N di kecamatan saya.
Sikap polisi terhadap suap
Perlawanan masyarakat Riau terhadap perusahaan minyak
Gaya kepemimpinan CEO bank
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Substance: literature review
29
Integrasikan & sintesakan literatur reviu
Integrasikan hasil dari literature reviu.
Temukan BIG PICTURE-nya.
Identifikasi variabel-nya (faktor yang mempengaruhi,
konteks, dst)
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
SUBSTANCE
33
Metode
Sampel?
Alat ukur?
Wawancara: berapa orang, protokol wawancara, hasil
wawancara, dst.
Kuesioner: definisi variabel, indikator perilaku, validitas,
reliabilitas, dst.
Teknik analisa?
Bias?
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP
35
Ikuti author guideline jurnal yang dituju
Jurnal Makara: HUBS-Asia hubsasia.ui.ac.id
Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP
36
Introduction:
The introduction is CRITICAL
It should be interesting
consist of:
1. Opening statements:
2. Review on previous studies
3. Research Question
4. Potential contributions
5. Study overview
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Opening statements:
Phenomena: (1) data; (2) examples
A discussion about people and their behaviours, not
about psychologists and their research.
The occurrence of violence against women has
increased dramatically in the past 10 years (BPS,
2012)
Quotes
STOP &THINK
How do Richins and Dawson (1992) open their article?
Corina_Academic Writing_2014
CRAFTMANSHIP
38
Convey complex thoughts and ideas as
simply as you can.
One idea per sentence.
Each sentence has a Subject & Predicate
One main idea per paragraph.
One paragraph consists of 4-7 sentences.
Concrete examples
Provide evidence to your ideas.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP
39
CONCISE
Focus on directly relevant materials.
We (Asian) have a tendency to digress, or discuss the context far too
long.
Differentiate thinking stage and writing stage.
Usually only the last 2-3 pages of student’s introduction section is
relevant.
Ask yourself:
Is this paragraph, sentence or word necessary?
Ask others:
Have 2 – 3 people read and comment your paper before submit it.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP – penulisan
kebaruan
40
(1) Jelas, spesifik, dan langsung ke sasaran.
Topik penelitian ini penting diketahui karena ….
Artikel ini berkontribusi terhadap teori pendidikan
dengan menunjukkan bahwa …
Artikel ini akan menjembatani perdebatan yang ada
dengan cara ….
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
CRAFTMANSHIP – penulisan
kebaruan
41
(2) Kata-kata “Belum pernah dilakukan
sebelumnya” adalah kalimat yang tidak jelas, dan
belum tentu menunjukkan bahwa artikel tersebut
secara substantif menghadirkan pengetahuan
yang penting bagi masyarakat akademis.
(3): Topik penelitian yang penting untuk
diketahui dan, secara teoritis, belum diketahui
hanya dapat ditemukan melalui kajian pustaka
yang berbobot.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Menentukan outlet publikasi
43
Presentasi di Konferensi
Doctoral colloquium
Workshop on research methods, etc.
Proceeding
Jurnal nasional
Jurnal internasional : good, poor, predatory
Newspapers / books / social media
Outlet mana yang dipilih: tergantung
tujuannya.
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Type of International Journal
44
Predatory/Vanity
Poor Journal
Good Journal
Links
http://scholarlyoa.com/
http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/
http://go.thomsonreuters.com/jcr/
http://anti-plagiarism-org.blogspot.com/
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Predatory
Poor
Good
Scope
Too broad
Specific
Specific
Name / Title
The name does
not reflect its
origin.
Has clear origin
Has clear origin
Editorial board
& Reviewers
No link to
academic
institution
Clear Link to
academic
institution
Clear Link to
academic
institution
Academic
expertise of
editorial board
No evident
Clear
Acceptable Hindex
Clear
Good H-index
Trustworthy
Review process
No, or
extremely
limited
Limited
Thorough,
double blind
review
Indexed in
Usually N/A
Indexed in TR /
Scopus
Indexed in TR /
Scopus
Impact Factor
Falsely claims to No IF
have IF (e.g.,
view factor)
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
45
Good IF
The Impact Factor
46
The impact factor (IF) of an
academic journal is a measure reflecting the
average number of citations to recent articles
published in the journal.
It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative
importance of a journal within its field, with journals
with higher impact factors deemed to be more
important than those with lower ones.
The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the
founder of the Institute for Scientific Information.
Impact factors are calculated yearly for those journals
that are indexed in the Journal Citation Reports.
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Contoh
47
the calculation is made every two years
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, IF: 21.952.
In 2010,
citation of articles published in 2009: 178;
citations of articles published in 2008: 283;
Total: 461
The number of articles published is 21 (2009 = 9; 2008=
12).
The impact factor is thus: 461 / 21 = 21.952.
Each article in BEHAV BRAIN SCI is thus (on the
average) 22 times cited in the past two years.
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Differences between Rank
48
Thomson Google
-Reuters Scholar
Microsoft
Academic
Search
Behavioral and Brain
Sciences
1
>20
21
Annual review of Psychology
2
6
11
Psychological Bulletin
3
3
1
Trends in cognitive sciences
5
1
13
Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology
18
2
3
Psychological Review
6
8
2
Corina_Academic Writing_LPDP_2016
Menentukan Jurnal Target
49
Relevance
Quality of the journal
Review Process
Frequency of publication
Open access
http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
ATTITUDES during the process of publication
50
HARGAI :
PANTANG MUNDUR
1. Rendah hati
1. Percaya diri
2. Baca keputusan / input
dengan hati-hati
2. (hampir) semua
artikel selalu harus
memperbaik
tulisannya.
3. Ingat bahwa input itulah
yang menyebabkan kita
maju.
4. Responi setiap input
dengan komprehensif .
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
3. Terus berjuang
ATTITUDE - S O P - writing for int’l
journal
51
S
Set specific time to read &
write
O
One step at a time
P
Persevere
Professional Development
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
Terimakasih
c.riantoputra@gmail.com
Corina_Workshop penulisan ilmiah_2017
52