6. DAFTAR PUSTAKA - 12.70.0159 Ardana Yulinda Satya Putri LAMPIRAN
6. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Ahalya, N., Ramachandra, T.V., Kanamadi, RD., 2003, Biosorption of Heavy Metal,
Research Journal Of Chemical And Environment 7(4): 71-79Badan Standarisasi Nasional 2009. SNI 01-3548-1994. Sardin Media Saus Tomat dalam
Kaleng.Badan Standarisasi Nasional 2004. SNI 06-6989.6-2004. Air dan air limbah – Bagian 6:
Cara uji tembaga (Cu) dengan Spektrofotometri Serapan Atom (SSA)-nyala.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional 2004. SNI 06-6989.8-2004. Air dan air limbah- – Bagian 8: Cara uji timbal (Pb) dengan Spektrofotometri Serapan Atom (SSA)-nyala.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional 2009. SNI 06-6989.16-2009. Air dan air limbah
- – Bagian 16: Cara uji kadmium (Cd) dengan Spektrofotometri Serapan Atom (SSA)-nyala.
Badan Standarisasi Nasional 2009. SNI 7387: 2009. Batas Maksimum Cemaran Logam
Berat dalam Pangan. Baker, R. A. 1994. Pectin. Carbohydrate Polymer. 12: 133-138Charlena, 2004. Pencemaran Logam Berat Timbal (Pb) dan Cadmium (Cd) pada Sayur-
sayuran. Falsafah Sains. Program Pascasarjana S3 IPB.Constenla, D., Ponce, A. and Lozano, J. 2002. Effect of pomace drying on apple pectin.
LWT-Food Science and Technology 35:216-221. Darmono, 1995. Logam Berat dalam Sistem Biologi. UI Press. Jakarta.
Day, R. A, A L.Underwood (1999), Analisis Kimia Kuantitatif, Edisi Kelima, Erlangga,
Jakarta.
Ebdon, L. (1982), An Introduction to Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy-A self teaching
Approach, Heyden and Sons, London
Eliaz, I., E. Weil and B. Wilk, 2007. Integrative medicine and the role of modified citrus
pectin/aliginates in heavy metal chelation and detoxification-five case reports.Forsch Komplementmed, 14: 358-364. DOI: 10.1159/000109829
Endress, H. U. 1991. Nonfood uses of pectin. Pages 251-268 in: The chemistry and
technology of pectin. H. W. Reginald, ed. Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA.Hall, D. 2010. Eat More Dietary Fibe.
Diunduh 01 Februari 2015 Herbstreith, K dan G. Fox. 2005. Pectin.
Diunduh 12 November 2015
Hoejgard, S. (2004). Pectin Chemistry, Funcionality, and Applications.
Igwe, J.C and Abia, A.A., 2006, A Bioseparation Process for Removing Heavy Metals
from Waste Water Using Biosorbents, African Journal of Biotechnology Vol.5(12), 1167-1179.
Kurniasari, L., 2010, “Pemanfaatan Mikroorganisme dan Limbah pertanian Sebagai
Bahan Baku Biosorben Logam Berat” Majalah Ilmiah Fakultas Teknik Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang, MOMENTUM, ISSN 0216 7395, Volume6 Nomor 2, 5-8
Li, B. W., K. W. Andrews and P. R. Pehrsson. (2002). Individual Sugars, Soluble, and
Insoluble Dietary Fiber Contents of 70 High Consumption Foods. . Diuduh 30 September 2015.
Lubis, E.S; Lely Sari Lubis; Julia Reveny. (2012). Pelembab Kulit Alami Dari Sari
Buah Jeruk Bali [Citrus maxima (Burm.) Osbeck]. Journal of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, 2012 Vol. 1 (2): 104 -111. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Indonesia.
Mata, YN., Blazquez, ML., Ballester, A., Gonzalez, F., Munoz, JA., 2009, Sugar-beet
Pulp Pectin Gels as Biosorbent for Heavy Metals: Preparation and Determination of Biosorption and Desorption Characteristics, Chemical Engineering Journal 150, 289-301.
McCready, R.M. 1965. Extraction of the Pectin from the Citrus Peels and Preservation
of Pectin Acid. Method Carbohydrate Chem, 8:167-170.Nawirska, A. and M. K. Sniewska. (2005). Dietary Fibre Fractions from Fruit and
Vegetable Processing Waste. . Diunduh 25Palar, H. 1995. Pencemaran dan etoksiologi logam berat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Park, H. J., M. Kim, S. M. Shim and G. H. Kim. (2005). Adsorption of Kadmium and
Lead by Various Cereals from Korea.Diunduh
05 September 2015.
Puteri, D. N. 2012. Penyerapan Logam Kadmium (Cd) oleh Fraksi Terlaut dan Tidak
Terlarut Biji Jinten Hitam (Nigela Sativa L): Pengaruh Ukuran Partikel danKonsentrasi yang Berbeda. Skripsi. Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata, Semarang.
Rao, K.S., M. Mohapatra, S. Anandz dan P. Venkateswarlu. (2010). Review on
Cadmium Removal from Aqueous Solutions. International Journal ofEngineering, Science and Technology Vol. 2, No. 7, 2010, pp 81-103. Diunduh 16 Desember 2015.
Rolin, C. 2002. Commercial pectin preparations. Pages 222-241 in: Pectins and their
manipulation. G. B. Seymour and J. P. Knox, eds. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.Sharma, N.; and J. Singh. (2008). Removal Zn2+ ions from aqueous solution using rice
(Oryza Sativa) Husk in Sequential Bed Adsorption Coloumn. Panjab University.Chandigarh. 12 Desember 2015.
Schiewer, S & Patil, B.S. 2007. Pectin-rich fruit wastes as biosorbents for heavy metal
removal: Equilibrium and kinetics. Bioresour. Technol. (2007), doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.060. University of Alaska Fairbanks. United States.
Sudarmaji., Mukono, J., & Corie, P. I. (2006). Toksikologi Logam Berat B3 dan
Dampaknya Terhadap Kesehatan. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 2(2), 129 -142. Soelarso, B. 1997. Budidaya Apel. Kanisius. YogyakartaTorresday, J.L.G., Rosa, G., Videa, J.R.P., 2004, Use of Phytofiltration Technologies in
The Removal of Heavy Metals: A review, Pure Appl. Chem. Vol. 76, No. 4, 801- 813. Untung, O. 1994. Jenis dan Budidaya Apel. Penebar Swadata. Jakarta.
USDA. (2011). USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 24.
USDA. Download 29 September 2015.
Widaningrum, M. dan Suismono. (2007). Bahaya Kontaminasi Logam Berat dalam
Sayuran dan Alternatif Pencegahan Cemarannya. .Diunduh 28 Maret 2015. Wirakusumah, E.S. 1995. Buah dan Sayur untuk Terapi. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Wong, W.W., Abbas F.M.A., Liong, M.T., Azhar, M.E., 2008, Modification of Durian
Rind Pectin for Improving Biosorbent Ability, International Food Research Journal 15(3), 363-365.
Zafar, F., M. Idrees and Z. Ahmed. (2005). Use of Apple By - Products in Poultry
Rations of Broiler Chicks in Karachi. .Diunduh 20 Agustus 2015.
Zhang, N., C. Huang and S. Ou. (2011). In Vitro Binding Capacities of Three Dietary
Fibers and Their Mixture for Four Toxic Elements, Cholesterol, and Bile Acid. . Diunduh 20 Agustus 2015.7. LAMPIRAN 7.1. Hasil Normalitas Data Penyerapan terhadap Logam Berat
7.1.1. Hasil Penentuan Waktu Kontak (Metode Non Teabag)
,254 3 . ,964 3 ,634 ,292 3 . ,923 3 ,463 ,196 3 . ,996 3 ,877 ,219 3 . ,987 3 ,780 ,175 3 . 1,000 3 ,999 ,175 3 . 1,000 3 1,000 ,327 3 . ,872 3 ,302 ,259 3 . ,959 3 ,613 ,334 3 . ,860 3 ,267 waktu_kontak
Shapiro-Wilk Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
1 jam 3 jam 5 jam 1 jam 3 jam 5 jam 1 jam 3 jam 5 jam fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cu
a. Penyerapan Kadmium
b. Penyerapan Tembaga Te sts of Normality
Shapiro-Wilk Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
1 jam 3 jam 5 jam 1 jam 3 jam 5 jam 1 jam 3 jam 5 jam fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_cd
,292 3 . ,923 3 ,463 ,219 3 . ,987 3 ,781 ,276 3 . ,942 3 ,537 ,219 3 . ,987 3 ,780 ,219 3 . ,987 3 ,780 ,175 3 . 1,000 3 1,000 ,247 3 . ,969 3 ,664 ,219 3 . ,987 3 ,780 ,320 3 . ,883 3 ,334 waktu_kontak
Te sts of Normality a.
Shapiro-Wilk This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov a
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
30 menit 60 menit 90 menit 30 menit 60 menit 90 menit 30 menit 60 menit 90 menit fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cd
,211 12 ,145 ,865 12 ,057 ,175 12 ,200* ,871 12 ,068 ,181 12 ,200* ,904 12 ,176 ,159 12 ,200* ,911 12 ,221 ,183 12 ,200* ,879 12 ,086 ,169 12 ,200* ,898 12 ,149 ,197 12 ,200* ,886 12 ,103 ,233 12 ,071 ,869 12 ,063 ,234 12 ,068 ,861 12 ,050 waktu_kontak
Te sts of Normality
Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
Shapiro-Wilk This is a lower bound of the true significance.
9 ,200* ,838 9 ,055 ,224 9 ,200* ,861 9 ,098 ,226 9 ,200* ,849 9 ,072 ,146 9 ,200* ,928 9 ,463 ,249 9 ,115 ,878 9 ,151 ,201 9 ,200* ,889 9 ,197 ,168 9 ,200* ,922 9 ,409 ,202 9 ,200* ,882 9 ,164 ,200 9 ,200* ,882 9 ,165 ,142 9 ,200* ,938 9 ,558 ,212 9 ,200* ,857 9 ,089 jenis_pektin pektin fresh pektin oven 5 jam pektin oven 10 jam pektin komersil pektin fresh pektin oven 5 jam pektin oven 10 jam pektin komersil pektin fresh pektin oven 5 jam pektin oven 10 jam pektin komersil fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cd Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
c. Penyerapan Timbal 7.1.2. Penelitian Utama
Te sts of Normality
,193 9 ,200* ,884 9 ,174 ,222Shapiro-Wilk Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
a
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
1 jam 3 jam 5 jam 1 jam 3 jam 5 jam 1 jam 3 jam 5 jam fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Pb
,191 3 . ,997 3 ,899 ,301 3 . ,912 3 ,425 ,282 3 . ,936 3 ,510 ,175 3 . 1,000 3 1,000 ,175 3 . 1,000 3 ,999 ,175 3 . 1,000 3 1,000 ,237 3 . ,976 3 ,705 ,286 3 . ,931 3 ,493 ,176 3 . 1,000 3 ,979 waktu_kontak
a. Penyerapan Kadmium
Te sts of Normality
- .
- .
- .
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Shapiro-Wilk This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Te sts of Normality
,255 9 ,094 ,837 9 ,053 ,2339 ,174 ,843 9 ,062 ,186 9 ,200* ,890 9 ,199 ,183 9 ,200* ,915 9 ,350 ,114 9 ,200* ,970 9 ,897 ,193 9 ,200* ,902 9 ,265 ,115 9 ,200* ,963 9 ,829 ,199 9 ,200* ,872 9 ,128 ,245 9 ,128 ,854 9 ,082 ,189 9 ,200* ,876 9 ,143 ,165 9 ,200* ,920 9 ,396 ,152 9 ,200* ,934 9 ,519 jenis_pektin pektin fresh pektin oven 5 jam pektin oven 10 jam pektin komersil pektin fresh pektin oven 5 jam pektin oven 10 jam pektin komersil pektin fresh pektin oven 5 jam pektin oven 10 jam pektin komersil fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cu Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Kolmogorov-Smirnov a
Shapiro-Wilk This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
Te sts of Normality
,190 12 ,200* ,867 12 ,060 ,159 12 ,200* ,909 12 ,209 ,188 12 ,200* ,890 12 ,119 ,111 12 ,200* ,964 12 ,833 ,201 12 ,197 ,863 12 ,054 ,090 12 ,200* ,967 12 ,872 ,156 12 ,200* ,928 12 ,364 ,247 12 ,041 ,870 12 ,065 ,190 12 ,200* ,873 12 ,072 waktu_kontak
30 menit 60 menit 90 menit 30 menit 60 menit 90 menit 30 menit 60 menit 90 menit fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cu
b. Penyerapan Tembaga 7.2. Tabel Deskriptif Statistik Penyerapan Logam Berat
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
a
- .
Lilliefors Significance Correction a.
a. Penyerapan Kadmium
De scriptiv e Statistics
36 81,21 209,01 147,5850 34,53136 36 9,01 156,82 85,4017 43,31627 36 122,39 357,26 232,9867 69,49059
36 fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cd Valid N (listwise)
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
b. Penyerapan Tembaga
a. Penyerapan Kadmium oleh Fraksi Tidak Terlarut
b. Penyerapan Kadmium oleh Fraksi Terlarut De scriptiv e Statistics
36 18,57 149,23 83,2975 36,65794 36 1,03 55,24 19,3656 14,06866 36 51,08 154,52 102,6633 29,89601
36 fraksi_tidak_terlarut fraksi_terlarut total_Cu Valid N (listwise)
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
7.3. Hasil Uji Beda Penyerapan Logam Berat 7.3.1. Penyerapan Kadmium
Cd_fraksi_tidak_terlarut Duncan a 3 84,2333 3 107,1633 3 113,2933 3 128,4967 3 137,6800 3 152,6033 3 154,5200 3 156,3033 3 163,9300 3 175,8433
3 189,6300 3 207,3233 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,172 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 variasi komersial 30 menit komersial 60 menit fresh 90 menit fresh 60 menit oven 10 jam 30 menit komersial 90 menit oven 10 jam 60 menit fresh 30 menit oven 5 jam 90 menit oven 5 jam 30 menit oven 10 jam 90 menit oven 5 jam 60 menit Sig. N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. 10 Subset for alpha = .05 Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3,000. a.
Cd_fraksi_te rlarut Duncan a 3 11,9667 3 28,9367 3 41,0233 3 62,1567 3 75,3033 3 83,3300 3 92,4500 3 92,5300 3 113,7033 3 125,4400
3 145,9967 3 151,9833 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ,976 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 variasi komersial 90 menit komersial 60 menit komersial 30 menit oven 10 jam 90 menit fresh 90 menit oven 10 jam 60 menit oven 10 jam 30 menit fresh 60 menit fresh 30 menit oven 5 jam 90 menit oven 5 jam 60 menit oven 5 jam 30 menit Sig. N 1 2 3 4
5
6 7 8 9 10 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. 11 Subset for alpha = .05 Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3,000. a.7.3.2. Penyerapan Tembaga
a.
a.
Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3,000.
6 Subset for alpha = .05 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
5
4
3
2
1
N
3 52,4900 ,967 ,392 ,958 ,813 1,000 1,000 variasi fresh 90 menit oven 5 jam 60 menit komersial 30 menit oven 5 jam 90 menit fresh 60 menit oven 10 jam 90 menit fresh 30 menit oven 10 jam 60 menit komersial 90 menit oven 5 jam 30 menit oven 10 jam 30 menit komersial 60 menit Sig.
3 3,2000 3 3,2867 3 8,2733 3 10,0600 3 10,2067 3 17,2400 3 17,3500
3 24,8500
3 25,3333
3 25,3833
3 34,7133Cu_fraksi_te rlarut Duncan a
a. Penyerapan Tembaga oleh Fraksi Tidak Terlarut
b. Penyerapan Tembaga oleh Fraksi Terlarut Cu_fraksi_tidak_terlarut Duncan a 3 21,4700
8 Subset for alpha = .05 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
N
3 144,7767 1,000 ,429 ,277 ,394 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 variasi komersial 60 menit komersial 30 menit oven 10 jam 30 menit fresh 30 menit komersial 90 menit oven 5 jam 60 menit oven 10 jam 60 menit oven 5 jam 30 menit oven 10 jam 90 menit fresh 60 menit oven 5 jam 90 menit fresh 90 menit Sig.
3 130,7133
3 45,9500 3 48,4300 3 65,0667 3 67,3033 3 68,7033 3 85,9933 3 88,6700 3 109,3967
3 123,0967
Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3,000.
7.4. Tabel ANOVA Penyerapan Logam Berat 7.4.1. Penyerapan Kadmium
a. Penyerapan Kadmium oleh Fraksi Tidak Terlarut a Le vene's Te st of Equality of Error Variance s
Dependent Variable: fraksi_tidak_terlarut F df1 df2 Sig.
,219
11 24 ,994 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a.
Design: Intercept+jenis_pektin+waktu_ kontak+jenis_pektin * waktu_kontak
Te sts of Betwee n-Subje cts Effects
Dependent Variable: fraksi_tidak_terlarut Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
a
Corrected Model 41511,501 11 3773,773 406,119 ,000
Intercept 784127,960 1 784127,960 84384,954 ,000 jenis_pektin 24161,254
3 8053,751 866,715 ,000 waktu_kontak 1661,499 2 830,750 89,402 ,000 jenis_pektin *
15688,748 6 2614,791 281,394 ,000 waktu_kontak Error
223,015 24 9,292 Total
825862,475
36 Corrected Total 41734,515
35 a. R Squared = ,995 (Adjusted R Squared = ,992)
b. Penyerapan Kadmium oleh Fraksi Terlarut a Le vene's Te st of Equality of Error Variance s
Dependent Variable: fraksi_terlarut F df1 df2 Sig.
,670
11 24 ,752 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a.
Design: Intercept+jenis_pektin+waktu_ kontak+jenis_pektin * waktu_kontak
Te sts of Betwee n-Subje cts Effects
Dependent Variable: fraksi_terlarut Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
a
Corrected Model 65419,341 11 5947,213 568,331 ,000
Intercept 262564,008 1 262564,008 25091,314 ,000 jenis_pektin 59309,219 3 19769,740 1889,249 ,000 waktu_kontak
5888,256 2 2944,128 281,349 ,000 jenis_pektin * 221,866 6 36,978 3,534 ,012 waktu_kontak
Error 251,144 24 10,464
Total 328234,493
36 Corrected Total 65670,485
35 a. R Squared = ,996 (Adjusted R Squared = ,994)
c. Total Kadmium yang Terserap a Le vene's Te st of Equality of Error Variance s
Dependent Variable: total_Cd F df1 df2 Sig.
1,527
11 24 ,186 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a.
Design: Intercept+jenis_pektin+waktu_ kontak+jenis_pektin * waktu_kontak
Te sts of Betwee n-Subje cts Effects
Dependent Variable: total_Cd Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
a
Corrected Model 168590,049 11 15326,368 869,723 ,000 Intercept 1954180,326 1 1954180,326 110893,6 ,000 jenis_pektin
149096,791 3 49698,930 2820,258 ,000 waktu_kontak 1601,544 2 800,772 45,441 ,000 jenis_pektin *
17891,714 6 2981,952 169,216 ,000 waktu_kontak Error 422,931 24 17,622 Total 2123193,306
36 Corrected Total 169012,980
35 a. R Squared = ,997 (Adjusted R Squared = ,996)
7.4.2. Penyerapan Tembaga
a. Penyerapan Tembaga oleh Fraksi Tidak Terlarut a Le vene's Te st of Equality of Error Variance s
Dependent Variable: fraksi_tidak_terlarut F df1 df2 Sig.
,453
11 24 ,914 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a.
Design: Intercept+jenis_pektin+waktu_ kontak+jenis_pektin * waktu_kontak
Te sts of Betwee n-Subje cts Effects
Dependent Variable: fraksi_tidak_terlarut Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
a
Corrected Model 46690,815 11 4244,620 297,574 ,000
Intercept 249785,046 1 249785,046 17511,482 ,000 jenis_pektin
21656,494 3 7218,831 506,085 ,000 waktu_kontak 16912,118 2 8456,059 592,822 ,000 jenis_pektin *
8122,203 6 1353,701 94,903 ,000 waktu_kontak Error 342,338 24 14,264 Total
296818,199
36 Corrected Total 47033,153
35 a. R Squared = ,993 (Adjusted R Squared = ,989)
b. Penyerapan Tembaga oleh Fraksi Terlarut a Le vene's Te st of Equality of Error Variance s
Dependent Variable: fraksi_terlarut F df1 df2 Sig.
,347
11 24 ,964 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a.
Design: Intercept+jenis_pektin+waktu_ kontak+jenis_pektin * waktu_kontak
Te sts of Betwee n-Subje cts Effects
Dependent Variable: fraksi_terlarut Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
a
Corrected Model 6769,928 11 615,448 93,768 ,000
Intercept 13500,891 1 13500,891 2056,955 ,000 jenis_pektin 2256,483 3 752,161 114,597 ,000 waktu_kontak 536,090 2 268,045 40,839 ,000 jenis_pektin *
3977,355 6 662,893 100,996 ,000 waktu_kontak Error
157,525 24 6,564 Total
20428,343
36 Corrected Total 6927,452
35 a. R Squared = ,977 (Adjusted R Squared = ,967) c.
Total Tembaga yang Terserap a Le vene's Te st of Equality of Error Variance s
Dependent Variable: total_Cu F df1 df2 Sig.
,314
11 24 ,975 Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a.
Design: Intercept+jenis_pektin+waktu_ kontak+jenis_pektin * waktu_kontak
Te sts of Betwee n-Subje cts Effects
Dependent Variable: total_Cu Type III Sum Source of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
a
Corrected Model 30655,126 11 2786,830 106,694 ,000 Intercept
379431,360 1 379431,360 14526,564 ,000 jenis_pektin 11215,970 3 3738,657 143,135 ,000 waktu_kontak 11852,836 2 5926,418 226,893 ,000 jenis_pektin *
7586,319 6 1264,387 48,407 ,000 waktu_kontak Error 626,876 24 26,120 Total 410713,362
36 Corrected Total 31282,002
35 a. R Squared = ,980 (Adjusted R Squared = ,971)