The Background of Study

Reading and writing activities can be easily coordinated. The answering of question and the writing of resumes are obvious example of written work. Reading selection can be used for oral practice in several ways. Sentences from the reading that contain difficult grammatical patterns may become model for rapid patterns drills with the teacher giving the cues. 2 Reading enables the students to understand the messages presented in written form. They read because they want to get something from the writing; facts, ideas, enjoyment, even feelings of family from letter. They read to obtain the information for some purpose. For example, when the students read the instructions on a ticket machine, they need to know how to operate it, when the students read the road sign so that they know where to go. Meanwhile, the students have some problems when they read, sometimes they get difficulty to understand the meaning of a sentence and they become more confused to read a long paragraph. So, they felt reading is a boring subject. Jeremy Harmer, in his book How to teach English, states “six principles behind the teaching of reading”, they are ; 1. Reading is not a passive skill. 2. Student need to be engaged with what they are reading. 3. Student should be encouraged to respond to the content of reading text, not just to the language. 4. Prediction is a major factor in reading. 5. Match the task to the topic. 6. Good teachers exploit reading texts to the full. 3 School is one of places where pupils, or in common term as above called student, learn language. The process of teaching and learning, the interaction between teachers and students, happens in the school. But there are a number of problems that teachers might face in the process of teaching and 2 Edward David Allen and Rebecca M. Valette, Classroom Techniques; Foreign Language and English as a Second Language,New York; Harcourt Bracce Jovanovich, Inc, 1979, p.267 3 Jeremy Harmer, How to Teach English , Cambridge: Longman, 1998, p.70 learning reading. One of the problems that teachers encounter is to choose the appropriate methodology in teaching language. Brown states: Language teachers have long been faced with a plethora of ‘methods’ from which to choose. Each ‘method’ has tended to claim for itself authority concerning what students need to learn, the best way to match students’ learning styles, or in some cases the truth about how to present or practice language. 4 As we knows there are many teachers still use explanatory method, they just explain the materials and the students just listen what he said. The result that the students are bo ring, they didn’t enjoy learning and their achievements become reduce. They need some activity which can make them fun with the reading learning process, so they can get achieve the main objective of the learning process. One of the activity is discussion. Discussion is the common types of communication activity. The good characteristics of discussion is the exchange information of each other. It is useful for the students to express their ideas without fear and embarrassment. In these activities, the students must work together to develop a plan, resolve the problem or complete the task. Meanwhile Eugene E. Wright states, Discussion is the systematic, objective sharing and evaluating of ideas and information by two or more persons for the purpose of investigating and solving a problem. 5 The smaller the group of discussion the more alive and effective the discussion would be. Because it make each person easier to express the idea. Every person have more role on the group to be active in the discussion, to help their friends to finish the task. 4 James Dean Brown, The Elements of Language Curriculum, A Systematic Approach to Program Development, Boston: Heinle Heinle Publishers, 1995, p.1. 5 White E. Eugene, Practical Speech English Fundamentals,New York, McMillan Company, 1960 p.425 Based on the background above, the writer would like to make research on SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang, about The effectiveness of small group discussion in teaching reading comprehension. The writer choose SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang because when the writer came to the school to observe to fulfill the assignment from his lecture, the writer found the teacher just use an explanatory method in every time schedule subject. Students just listen to the teacher explanation and then they do some matters given by the teacher until he give a score for them and so on, it seems boredom for them. The writer make a conclusion that they need a variation in teaching learning English process, in order to give a good impression to the student about English subject and to make a teaching learning process more alive for them, then finally teacher will reach the purpose of the teaching English.

B. The Limitation of Study

To avoid misunderstanding in interpreting the problem, it is necessary for the writer to make the limitation of the problem. The writer limits the problem only on The effectiveness of teaching reading comprehension of small group discussion with procedure text in 8 th grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang.

C. The Formulation of Study

Based on the statement above the writer would like to formulate the problem for the research as follows: Do the students who learn reading through small group discussion show better achievement than the students who learn reading through explanatory method?.

D. The Objective of Study

As the objective of study, the writer would like to find the empirical evidence on the effectiveness of small group discussion in teaching reading comprehension.

E. The Significance of Study

This study is also expected to give a contribution on how to teach reading comprehension based on small group discussion and also finding out an alternative in teaching English especially in teaching reading comprehension using Small Group Discussion.

F. The Method of Study

This study employs experiment method. The writer will teach reading in two different classes using two different methods. To find out which method is more effective, in the beginning of the lesson the writer will give the pre-test to the student of both class to find out both group have relatively the same level of competence. In the experiment class the writer teaches reading comprehension using small group discussion while in the control class the writer teaches it using explanatory method. At the end of the experiment, the writer will administer post test to the classes and compare the test result using T-test formula.

G. The Organization of Study

This paper consists of four chapters. The first chapter is introduction. It explains about the main problem of this paper. It covers the background of the study, the scope of study, the formulation of problem, the objective of study, the significance of the study, the method of study, and the organization of study. The second chapter is theoretical framework and it consists of two parts. Part A is about Reading, containing the General Understanding of reading , the Types of Reading, the Purpose of Reading, and The Purpose of teaching Reading. Part B is about Group discussion , containing the Understanding of Group, the Understanding of Discussion, the types of Group Discussion, and the Advantages and Disadvantages of Group Discussion The third chapter is the implementation of the research. It consists of two parts. Part A is the methodology of the research, containing the objective of the research, place and time of the research, the population of the research, the procedures of the research, the instrument of the research, the techniques of data collecting, and the techniques of data analysis. Part B is the findings of the research, containing the description of data, the analysis of data, the test of hypothesis, and the interpretation of data. The fourth chapter is the conclusions and suggestions. It is a core review of previous discussion in this paper.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effectiveness of using small groupinteraction in teaching reading comprehension

1 10 93

The Effectiveness of Small Group Discussion Method in Teaching Reading.

1 3 45

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 TULUNGAGUNG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016 2017 - Institutional Repository of IAIN Tulungagung

0 0 5

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 TULUNGAGUNG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016 2017 - Institutional Repository of IAIN Tulungagung

0 0 19

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 TULUNGAGUNG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016 2017 - Institutional Repository of IAIN Tulungagung

0 0 15

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 TULUNGAGUNG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016 2017 - Institutional Repository of IAIN Tulungagung

0 4 25

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 TULUNGAGUNG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016 2017 - Institutional Repository of IAIN Tulungagung

0 0 8

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMAN 1 TULUNGAGUNG IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016 2017 - Institutional Repository of IAIN Tulungagung

1 2 2

TEACHING SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE AT THE ACCOUNTING STUDY PROGRAM Rivi Antoni Abstract - TEACHING SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TECHNIQUE AT THE ACCOUNTING STUDY PROGRAM

0 0 10

The Effect of Small Group Discussion toward Eighth Graders Reading Comprehension

0 0 13