Theoretical Assumption FRAME OF THEORIES

III. RESEARCH METHODS

This chapter illustrates how the research will be done; what design of research will be; who the population and the sample will be; and how the data will be gathered. It also covers validity and reliability of the instrument, treatment of data, and data analysis.

3.1 Research Design

This research was quantitative design. It was aimed to find out whether there is a significant difference of pronunciation achievement between students taught through songs and those taught through games in teaching pronunciation. During this research; a true experimental research two group-prettest-posttest design was applied. There werenbjhLO two classes as the subject of research. One class was the experimental class and the others one was the control class. The design can be illustrated as follows: G1 = T1 X1 T2 G2 = T1 X2 T2 Where: G1 : Experimental Class G2 : Control Class X1 : Treatment Using Song X2 : Treatment Using Games T1 : Prettest T2 : Posttest Setiyadi 2006: 143

3.2 Population and Sample

The population of this research was students in the second grade of SMP Gajah Mada Bandarlampung. The researcher decided to take two classes that are selected by using purposive sampling.The students were puposively sampled based on a consideration from the English teacher in this school. It was caused the ability of both classes was similar. It was taken as the subject of this research in which choosing VIII A as experimental class and VIII B as control class. After the pretest for both classes were conducted, the results were compared to know whether both classes have a relatively equal basic ability in pronunciation mastery.

1. Variable

There were two variables that were organized in this research; they are dependent and independent variables. The researcher determined the variables as follows: 1. The independent variable was the treatment is proposed in the research Song and Games 2. The dependent variable was the students’ pronunciation achievement. The main variable in this research is the students’ pronunciation achievement as the dependent variable. It was measured after all treatments in the research were done. Independent variable was the one in a research which takes role as the cause or functions that affect the dependent variable.

3.3 Research Procedure

The procedures of the research was as follows: 1. Determining the research problem The problems of the research intented to find out whether there is significant difference of students’ pronunciation achievement between the students who were taught through songs and the students who were taught through games. 2. Determining the subject of the research Two out of many classes in SMP Gajah Mada Bandarlampung was selected as the subject of research. To determine the class will be the experimental class and the control class. 3. Preparing material for pretest In this research, the pretest was conducted both sample classes. This test was given to know whether two groups have the same initial mastery of pronunciation before giving the treatment.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PREPOSITION OF PLACE TAUGHT THROUGH REALIA AND TAUGHT THROUGH PICTURES AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMPN 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 27

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH SQ3R AND TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 69 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT STUDENTS’ PERSONALITY AT THE SECOND YAR OF SMAN 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 18 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS WRITING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN EXTROVERT AND INTROVERT STUDENTS PERSONALITY AT THE SECOND YAR OF SMAN 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 30 61

Comparative Study between Power Teaching and Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in Improving Students’ Speaking Ability at Eleven Grade of SMAN 10 Bandar Lampung

0 6 66

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN COMMUNICATIVE DRILL AND ROLE PLAY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 7 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 5 56

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ FIELD DEPENDENT AND FIELD INDEPENDENT IN READING COMPREHENSION AT THE SECOND GRADE OF MAN 1 LAMPUNG TENGAH

1 10 60