2.1.2. Mining Environment Protection
Mining activity obliged to look after environment adhered environment values. State government has arranged this study in “UU No. 231997”
concerning Environment where each of gift permission of the mining effort have obligation to look after environment around mine site. This matter has an
important impact where have to provide with environment impact assessment AMDAL. Pursuant to the regulation by Department of Energy and Mineral
Resource in “Kepmen Pertambangan dan Energi No. 1211.K008M.PE1995” and other related relevant regulation, obligation of conservancy of environment
in mine site and its surroundings have to fulfill by company since the starting of exploration activity.
Considering the level of impact by mine activity, it needed some of management efforts, which is being planned and measured. Management of
environment in mining sector usually embraces some principle of Best Management Practice. USEPA 1995 recommended some efforts that feasible to
be used as an effort operation of mining impact activity to water resource, wild animal and vegetation Suyartono, 2003.
Furthermore, Suyartono 2003 explains some efforts operation of environment handling for instance by using sediment structure protection,
developing plan of waste operation system, avoiding activity of construction during critical farm, avoiding poisoned of cyanide, minimally usage of constrictor
or fence to animal migration path, and prohibition over hunting wild animal in mine site.
2.1.3. Mining Standardization
Formulation activity of Indonesian National Standard SNI of public mining until year 2002 have yielded Public Mining Standard SPU counted to
175 standards, which have been ratified by National Standardization Institute BSN become SNI. In the implementation, standard formulation activities are
cooperation among all stakeholders, that is Department of Energy and Mineral Resource, Relevant Institution and Local Government as governmental proxy with
standardization society mine entrepreneur, mine consumer, college and institution Suyartono, 2003.
The formulation process then continue overspread elementary concept which have been discussed to mining standard user society in order to get
comments, then conducting the Consensus Forum and proposed to BSN to be specified become SNI through solute discussion in BSN Standard Formulating
Commission. The final formulation process of SNI is gone into effect obligatorily or voluntary in public mining area mineral and coal mining passing Decree of
Energy and Mineral Resource Minister Suyartono, 2003. Suyartono 2003 explains in supporting and applying program racing of
standardization in local government, hence needed peripheral of transparent and well policy establishment so that can give positive impacts for growth of mining
investment in Indonesia, especially within applying policy of SNI in mining area. Rising of the “Peraturan Pemerintah No. 1022000” which immediately lifted
become law and regulation, hence Department of Energy and Mineral Resource Cq. General Directorate of Geology and Mineral Resource continue to formulate
new policy of standardization of mining area in harmony with policy of national standardization policy.
2.2. DECISION SUPORT SYSTEM
Decision Support System DSS is an interactive, flexible, and adaptable Computer-Based Information System CBIS, specially developed for supporting
the solution of a particular management problem for improved decision making Turban, 1993. Decision making is a process of choosing among alternative
courses of action for the purpose of achieving a goal or goals Turban, 1993. A decision support system DSS is a computer-based system that helps the decision
maker utilizes data and model to solve unstructured problems Sprague and Carlson, 1982.
The concept of DSS is based on the seminal work by Simon and associates in 1950s and 1960s Simon, 1960. The Spatial Decision Support System SDSS
concept has evolved in parallel with DSS. SDSS is an interactive, computer- based system designed to support a user or group of users in achieving a higher
effectiveness of decision making while solving a semi-structured spatial decision problem Densham, 1989. The development of SDSS has been associated with
the need to expand the Geographic Information System GIS capabilities for tackling complex, ill-defined, spatial decision problems Densham, 1989.
Similar to DSS, SDSS is composed of several software components which are the Data Base Management System DBMS with containing the functions to
manage the geographic data base, the Model Base Management System MBMS with containing the function to manage the model base and the Dialog Generation
and Management System DGMS with managing the interface between the user