Transformer 1 5 years in service

2 DGA MONITORING As part of asset management strategy, the state electricity company of the Republic of Indonesia, has implemented DGA as a standard method for condition monitoring of HV transformers. The time interval of the DGA monitoring is determined based on the condition of the equipment. The DGA has been applied as a standard method, since it is efficient to determine and classify the thermal and electrical faults. In addition to the DGA monitoring, condition monitoring of transformer using electrical, mechanical and thermal methods have also been applied. The later include Partial Discharge PD, Frequency Response Analysis FRA, Acoustic Emission AE, vibration analysis and infrared thermography techniques. DGA test results of three different transformers of similar type and capacity are discussed in this paper. The first transformer has been operated for five years with high vibration and noise. The second has operated for about ten years with thermal fault indication, while the third represents a seventeen years in service transformer. The DGA tests have been carried out for five years in series. The time interval between measurements is approximately a year. Interpretation techniques of the DGA test results presented here are of key gas method, Doernenburg’s ratio, IEC ratio and Duval’s triangle. In addition to the diagnosis using these interpretation methods, the trends of individual concentration and composition of the hydrocarbon gases are also presented. The trend of gas quantity may provide a useful fault indication within the transformer. The sample for DGA tests was of bottom oil of the main tank. The oil was taken from bottom drain valve of the transformer see yellow arrow sign in Figure 1. The oil sample was obtained during normal operation of the transformers, with an approximate temperature of 60°C. 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Transformer 1 5 years in service

The power transformer was manufactured in 2007, and commenced to operate in early 2008. It is an ONANONAF type with a capacity of 60MVA. The equipment is installed within a network substation, with an operating voltage of 15020kV. The cooling fan is set to operate at an oil temperature of 60°C and above. Previous measurement showed that the transformer produced a vibration acceleration of 311.27ms 2 , the highest among other tested power transformers in the region [8]. As a result of the high vibration, the transformer also produces a high audible noise. The maximum transformer loading during first year of operation was slightly above 15MW. It has been 100 increased of load since the time. Figure 2 shows typical daily load pattern of the transformer. The transformer is currently operated with a low loading scheme, mostly below 50 of its maximum capacity. During day time, the load is comparatively steady of about 21MW. Beginning about 5pm, the load increases to meet night peak demand. The maximum transformer loading is about 32MW and lasts for a few hours before decreases because of less power demand later at night. The recorded maximum oil temperature is about 65°C. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 Time Lo a d M W Figure 2: Typical load pattern of Transformer 1 Individual gas concentration in oil for Transformer 1 over the time period is illustrated in Figure 3. There was an increase in concentration of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, and ethane during first year operation of the transformer. The concentrations of these gases were comparably high, with carbon dioxide of 2714.29 ppm, carbon monoxide of 755.93 ppm, hydrogen of 281.45 ppm and the ethane of 192.48 ppm. Over the following three years however, the concentrations of the hydrocarbon gases have decreased gradually. 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year G as C o n cen tr a ti o n p p m CO2 CO H2 CH4 C2H6 C2H4 C2H2 Figure 3: Trend of individual gas concentration of Transformer 1 2137 The key gas chart in Figure 4 shows that the proportion of carbon monoxide and hydrogen has decreased over time period. In contrast, the proportion of methane and ethane was constantly increased. This indicates that during early operation of the transformer, there is a possibility of occurrence of low energy discharges that produces hydrogen, and slightly methane, ethane and ethylene. This approach has also indicated an occurrence of cellulose decomposition for the following years. However; after five years in service the key gas interpretation suggested no fault and the transformer has been classified into normal operation see Table 1. 20 40 60 80 100 CO H2 CH4 C2H6 C2H4 C2H2 G a s C o m p o s it io n 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Figure 4: Trend of hydrocarbon gas composition of Transformer 1 DGA interpretation using Doernenburg’s ratio has shown different results from year to year. There was an indication of low energy discharge in 2008 and thermal fault in 2011. In contrast, no fault indication was given by IEC ratio for five years in service. Similarly, Duval’s triangle approach provided no results. This is due to a low monthly increase rate of the hydrocarbon gases. Details of the DGA interpretations are shown in Table 1. Table 1: DGA interpretations of Transformer 1 Year Technique 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Key Gas Low energy Discharge Cellulose decom- position Cellulose decom- position Cellulose decom- position Normal Doernenburg Ratio Low energy Discharge High energy discharge NA Thermal fault NA IEC Ratio Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Duval’s Triangle NA NA NA NA NA The formation of comparably high carbon oxides and hydrogen during first year of transformer operation may relate to an early stage oxidation of the transformer oil. These gases may be generated not only as a result of faults within the equipment but also because of rusting process or other chemical reactions involving steel, uncoated surfaces or protective paints [7]. The amount of the produced gasses is very dependent on the characteristics of the oil, cellulose materials and other metallic components within the transformer. This condition is signified by the reduction in hydrocarbon gas concentrations for the following years, which may indicate that the chemical reaction is reaching a new equilibrium point. The increase of methane and ethane proportion between year 2011 and 2012 however, has been a concern for further investigation. The transformer is currently continued in normal service.

3.2 Transformer 2 10 years in service