Conclusion Suggestion CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

CHAPTER IV CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

According to the description in preceded chapter, the writer concluded that the students of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat are still confused in forming verb based on the context. Beside that, they have not been able to understand well the kinds of tenses in complex sentence or long dialog. The most type of errors, made by the students in test of English is in area of over generalization, with 115 errors, the percentage of error in over generalization is 63.1, in area of omission, there are 19 errors or 10.2 , in area of addition there are 34 errors or 18.7, in area of over- regularization there are 18 errors or 9.7, therefore there are no error in double-marking or 0. The highest percentage of error, in English Tenses from the six tenses is in area of simple present, there are 48 errors or 25.8, in area of present continuous tense there are 16 errors or 8.6 , and in area present perfect there are 22 errors or 11.8, in area of simple past there are 42 errors or 22.6, in area of past continuous there are 34 errors or 18.3, and in area of simple future there are 24 errors or 12.9. While the causes of errors are various, they are caused by language interference, students’ incomplete application of rule, errors caused by teaching material, false concept hypothesized and students’ carelessness. It means that the student still lack in acquiring the six English tenses, and its usage, then they should learn again, and the quality of English learning must be improved again to be the best.

B. Suggestion

Referring to the conclusion, the writer would like to suggest as follow: 1. The English Teacher should give the available time to explain more a bout English Tenses especially the tense that has the relation with the topic that he is going to teach. 2. The teacher should make more exercise, to improve students’ skill in English tenses 3. The linguistic aspect especially “grammar “should be taught as well as the four skills of English listening, speaking, reading, writing. 4. The Teacher can improve the effectiveness of teaching-learning activities by using the result of analysis on the student’s error. REFERENCE Azar Schrampfer Betty, Understanding and using English Grammar,New Jersey: Premice Hall,Inc.,1989,2 th Broughton, Geofry, et al, Teaching English as Foreign Language London: Tj Press Ltd, 1980. Brown, H. Douglas, Principles of Language learning and Teaching. London Longman, Inc 2000, Fourth Edition, Crystal, David, An encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages, Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. Chalker, Sylva, Weiner Edmund, the Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar, Oxford New York: Oxford University Press. Depdibud RI, GBPP Bahasa Inggris SMP, Depdikbud RI Jakarta,1994 Dullay. Heidi. ct. al. Language Two New. Yok: Oxford University Press, 1982. Gronlund, Norman Measurament and Evaluation in Teaching, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.aaInc.1981.Fouth Edition. Wishon,E. George, M.Burks Julia, Lets write English American Book Company. Finocchiaro Mary, Bonomo Michael, Teaching and Learning a Foreign Language New York: Regent Publ.Co.Inc. 1973. Fisiak, Jack ed. Contrastive Linguistic and language Teacher, England : Pentagon Press Ltd. 1981. Hogue,Ann, Alice Oshima, Introduction to Academic Writing, London; Longman Harmer, Jeremy,2001. The Practise of English Language Teaching, London; Longman, Third Edition. Huda Nuril, Language Learning and Teaching: Issues and Trends, Malang: IKIP Malang Publisher, 1999. Hornby, A.S., Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary Of Current English, Oxford University Press,1974. Http:teaching stylesonline.comstages of error analysis. Html.20 may 2006. Http:en. wikipedia .orgwikisecond Language Acquition. Murkancana,Wayan and Sumartan, PPN. Evaluasi Pendidikan Surabaya : PT Usaha Nasional. 1982. Rod Ellis, The Study of Second Language, Oxford University Press, 1995. Sharme. SK, Error Analsis: Why and How, English Teaching Forum April 1982 Vol. XXX Suharnasini Arikunto. Dasar – Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bina Aksara,ap.19. Taringan Henry Guntur and Djago Taringan, Pengajaran Analisis Kesalahan Berbahsa Bandung: Angkasa, 1988. Thomson, A.J, Matinent, A.V. A. Practical Englsh Grammar. Oxford University Press1986. Www. Humnet.ucla.Eduhumnetaflagaspect.hausa-online – grammar tenses tenses html. WWW. Edufind.Com.

CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAME WORK

Dokumen yang terkait

An analysis of students’ error in learning noun clause: a case study in the second grade students of SMA Darul Ma’arif

0 8 64

An analysis on students’ error in using modal auxiliaries: a case study in the eighth grade students at SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat

0 2 1

Error analysis on tenses learnt by the second grade students of islamic juniaor high school: a case of study at the second grade of islamic junior high school of Khazanah Kebijakan Pamulang

0 5 67

An Analysis of Students' Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP Trimulia Jakarta))

16 39 151

An error analysis on the use of present perfect and present perfect continous tense: a case study at the third grade student of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat

0 6 126

An error analysis in making wh-questions: a case study of the second year students of SMP Islam Al-Syukro Universal

11 122 176

ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE STUDENTS’ MASTERY ON THE USE OF GERUND, TO INFINITIVE AND INFINITIVE WITHOUT TO (A Case Study at the Second Grade of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Ciputat, Tangsel),

0 24 87

An Error Analysis on the Use of Present Perfect Tense and Present Perfect Continous Tense” (A Case study at third grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 17 Ciputat Timur

0 6 126

An analysis students’ error on preposition in English writing : A case study at the first grade of SMP Muhammadiyah 35 Jakarta

0 6 231

Error Analysis On The Students Writing Of Descriptive Text ( A Case Study at Second Grade Students of SMP PGRI 2 Ciputat).

0 26 132