Conclusions IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL THROUGH CONTENT BASED INSTRUCTION

commit to user cxiii chapter consisted of three parts: conclusion, implications, and suggestions. The detailed presentation of this chapter was as follows:

A. Conclusions

This research was conducted to solve the problems faced by the students of class 0902 of the Business English Department of CsVTC in improving their speaking skill. After analyzing the data gained from the pre-test, the researcher found that the students speaking ability was low and unsatisfying. The mean score of the pre-test was 59.6, and seventeen or forty-five percent students were under the average level. Moreover, the motivation of students in the class was low. Based on the observation and the interview with both the teacher and the students, the researcher found that the students didn’t like the content or topics discussed in the class. They would like to learn something useful and practical for their future jobs. Meanwhile, the teacher still used the traditional teaching approach or techniques to teach the students, which made the students lost their interest in the speaking class. In addition, the students showed low motivation in participating in the speaking task. They didn’t participate actively. During the speaking class, most of the students were keeping silent and only some braver students just used the mother tongue to answer the teacher’s questions. However, the implementation of the CBI was suggested by the researcher to solve the problems mentioned above. After the treatment was given, there were many positive results. The detailed description can be seen in the following parts: Firstly, the implementation of CBI was successful in improving the students’ speaking skill. By selecting the useful and practical contents, the students had great motivation to learn the speaking as the topics fallen under their interest and also met their needs. In addition, by applying different speaking activities, the students felt fun and happy. They actively involved in the speaking activities and practiced their language with their classmates in the class. Their speaking skill improved; they could use their just learned vocabularies and selected the appropriate words and expressions to discuss the topics with their friends in good pronunciation; they also could answer the teacher’s questions and comprehend the topics of the conversation and fluently communicate with their classmates in correct grammatical forms. Those indicators of speaking can be commit to user cxiv achieved by the CBI, and it could be seen from the analysis of the post-test of Cycle 1 and Cycle 2. The result of the students’ mean score was increased from 59 to 67, and there were no students found to be under average level in Cycle 2. Moreover, the changes also appeared in other aspects. Besides improving the students’ speaking skill, the classroom situation had been also changed. As the qualitative data in the field-notes collected from the teaching and learning process showed that there was improvement in students’ reaction towards the speaking class. Before, the students felt dull and bored in the class, and the whole class was teacher-centered; it was the teacher, who did most of her talk, but now, the situation was changed; the classroom situation became more alive. The students’ motivation to speak English was higher than before. As there were many pair and group activities or games in the class, the students felt eager to join the activities. During the group activities, the weak students tried to contribute their ideas to the group as they could, and the students who had good speaking ability tried to help the weak students to complete their group performance. The classroom atmosphere was conducive, and it became student-centered; the students were the performers while the teacher was the facilitator. The teacher monitored and helped the students when they needed. In the class, the students felt relax and joyful during the teaching and learning process. CBI had more strengths than weaknesses. CBI increased students’ participation in the speaking class by the practical and interesting content. CBI is very flexible, it could accommodate various types of activities which were motivating the students to participate in the speaking task, and it could adjust the students work in individual, in pair and in groups according to the content. Pair and group works were found to eliminate students’ psychological barriers and increase students’ self-confidence. Moreover, in the class, students were not only learning from their teacher but also from their friends. In the group work, each member of the group worked very hard to complete their group work and didn’t want to lag behind. They helped their group members and competed with other group members.

B. Implications