IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG Impoliteness In Criticism In Vlog.
IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG
THESIS
Submitted to the Department of Language Studies,
Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the degree of Master of Education
Written by :
IKA RATNA ROSANTI
S 200100039
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE STUDIES
GRADUATE SCHOOL
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
2016
APPROVAL
IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG
THESIS
Proposed by:
Ika Ratna Rosanti
S 200100039
Approved by:
Primary Supervisor
Second Supervisor
Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D
Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D
ii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROSVAL FORM
The student submits the thesis for examination:
Name
: Ika Ratna Rosanti
ID Number : S 200100039
Department : Languages Studies
Field of Study : English Education
Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog
Suppervisor’s Approval:
I confirm that the thesis written by the above-named student meets the scholarly
standard for the degree and is therefore eligible to proceed to an examination by
the board of examiners of the Department od Language Studies, the Graduate
School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Surakarta,
April 2017
Primary Supervisor,
Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D
iii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROSVAL FORM
The student submits the thesis for examination:
Name
: Ika Ratna Rosanti
ID Number : S 200100039
Department : Languages Studies
Field of Study : English Education
Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog
Suppervisor’s Approval:
I confirm that the thesis written by the above-named student meets the scholarly
standard for the degree and is therefore eligible to proceed to an examination by
the board of examiners of the Department od Language Studies, the Graduate
School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Surakarta,
April 2017
Second Supervisor,
Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D
iv
APPOVAL OF THESIS FOR SUBMISSION
IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG
Submitted by:
Ika Ratna Rosanti
Has been examined by the board of examiners on April 2017. All feedback,
corrections, and suggestions recommended by the examiners have been
considered and revision has been accordingly made by the student.
The boards of examiners certify that the thesis is eligible for submission.
The Board of Examiners
Primary Supervisor
Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D
Co-Supervisor
Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D
Examiner
Dr. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum
Surakarta, April 2017
The Director of Graduate School
Prof. Dr. Khudzaifah Dimyati
v
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
I hereby confirm that the thesis entitled “Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog” is an
original and authentic work written by myself and it has satisfied the rules and
regulations of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta with respect to plagiarism.
I certify that all quotations and the source of the information have been fully
referred and acknowledged accordingly.
I confirm that this thesis has not been submitted for the award of any previous
degree in any tertiary institution in Indonesia or abroad.
Name
: Ika Ratna Rosanti
ID Number : S 200100039
Department : Languages Studies
Field of Study : English Education
Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog
Date
:
April 2017
Signed :
(Ika Ratna Rosanti)
vi
MOTTOS
“Man Jadda Wa Jadda.”
“Those who do it seriously will be successful.”
-Arabian Proverb“Do your best and let God do the rest.”
-Ben Carson“I am thankful for all of those who said NO to me. It’s because of them I’m doing
it myself”
-Albert Einstein-
vii
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to:
My beloved husband
My beloved parents
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin, all praises just for Allah SWT, the lord of universe,
the one who sent the messenger Muhammad SAW to guide human to safest
religion, Islam. Thanks for blessing her in the thesis entitled “Impoliteness in
Criticim in Vlog”.
The writer would like to express her great gratitude and appreciation to:
1. Prof. Dr. Markhamah, M.Hum., as the head of language study
department of graduate program in Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta.
2. Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D., the academic supervisor and the primary
supervisor, who has given great help, guidance, advice, and correction from
the beginning up to the completion of this research paper.
3. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D., as the co-supervisor who patiently gave
her guidance and motivation.
4. Her beloved husband, who always accompany, support, and pray with
love.
5. Her beloved parents, who always pray, love, and give support.
6. Her beloved friends, who always pray and give support.
Last but not least, the writer realizes that this research is still far from being
perfect. Therefore, suggestion and positive criticism are hoped and needed to
make this research better.
The writer hopes that this research paper can contribute to useful reading for the
esteemed readers.
Wassalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
Surakarta, April 2017
The Writer,
Ika Ratna Rosanti.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ...............................................................................................................
i
APPROVAL .....................................................................................................
ii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM .......................................................... iii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM .......................................................... iv
APPROVAL OF THESIS SUBMISSION .....................................................
v
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP ................................................................ vi
MOTTO ............................................................................................................ vii
DEDICATION .................................................................................................. viii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................. ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ...................................................................................
x
ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... xii
LIST OF TABLE ............................................................................................. xiv
LIST OF APPENDIX ...................................................................................... xiv
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................
1
A. Background of the Study ..........................................................................
1
B. Limitation of the Study .............................................................................
6
C. Problem Statement ....................................................................................
6
D. Objective of the Study ..............................................................................
7
E. Benefit of the Study ..................................................................................
7
1. Theoretical Benefit ...............................................................................
7
2. Practical Benefit ....................................................................................
7
F. Research Paper Organization ....................................................................
7
CHAPTER II
UNDERLYING THEORY .........................................................................
9
A. Previous Study ..........................................................................................
9
B. Related Theory .......................................................................................... 18
1. Pragmatics ............................................................................................. 18
a. Sociopragmatic ................................................................................. 20
b. Pragmalinguistic .............................................................................. 20
2. Speech Act ............................................................................................ 21
x
a. Types of Speech Act ........................................................................ 21
b. Classification of Speech Act ............................................................ 22
3. Criticism ............................................................................................... 23
4. Impoliteness .......................................................................................... 28
a. Impoliteness Strategy ....................................................................... 29
b. Impoliteness and Responses to It ..................................................... 34
5. Computer Mediated Communication ................................................... 37
6. Language Gender ................................................................................. 41
7. Video Blogging ..................................................................................... 42
C. Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. 43
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................................. 44
A. Research Type ........................................................................................... 44
B. Research Object ........................................................................................ 44
C. Data and Data Source ............................................................................... 44
D. Technique of Collecting Data ................................................................... 44
E. Data Validity ............................................................................................. 45
F. Technique of Analyzing the Data ............................................................. 46
CHAPTER IV
FINDING AND DISCUSSION ................................................................... 47
A. Introduction .............................................................................................. 47
B. Types of Impoliteness Strategies .............................................................. 47
C. The Differences of Impoliteness Strategies used by Male and Female .... 77
D. The Findings ............................................................................................. 79
E. Discussion of The Findings ...................................................................... 82
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ....................................................... 85
A. Conclusion ............................................................................................... 85
B. Pedagogical Implication .......................................................................... 86
C. Suggestion ............................................................................................... 86
BIBLIOGRAPY
APPENDIXES
xi
ABSTRAK
Ika Ratna Rosanti. S 200100039. IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG.
Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2016.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan strategi ketidaksantunan
pada komentar di vlog. Penulis mendeskripsikan apa saja strategi ketidaksantunan
yang digunakan pada komentar di vlog dan apa saja perbedaan strategi
ketidaksantunan yang digunakan oleh komentator laki-laki dan perempuan pada
komentar di vlog. Ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif. Penulis menganalisis
ketidaksantunan secara deskriptif berdasarkan teori ketidaksantunan yang
dikemukakan oleh Culpeper (1996) untuk menilai perbedaan frekuensi strategi
ketidaksantunan oleh laki-laki dan perempuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan
Pearson Chi-Suare pada 0.05% dari perbedaan yang signifikan. Data dari
penelitian ini adalah penulisan ujaran yang mengandung strategi ketidaksantunan
yang digunakan pada komentar di vlog. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah
komentar dari video blogging pada acara The Late Late Show. Penulis
memperlihatkan hasil penelitian dengan tabel presentase dari setiap sub strategi
yang diantaranya adalah 10,8% ketidaksantunan secara langsung, 59,7%
ketidaksantunan positif, 20% ketidaksantunan negatif, 5,2% penggunaan sindiran,
dan 4,3% ketidaksantunan kombinasi. Penulis menemukan 230 total data dari
keseluruhan analisis ketidaksantunan pada komentar di vlog The Late Late Show.
Dari analisis data dapat disimpulkan bahwa laki-laki lebih banyak melakukan
ketidaksantunan dibandingkan perempuan.
Kata Kunci: Strategi ketidaksantunan, ujaran, komentator, komentar vlog.
xii
ABSTRACT
Ika Ratna Rosanti. S 200100039. IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG.
Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2016.
This research aims to analyse the use of impoliteness strategies in vlog comment.
The writer describes the types of impoliteness strategies used in the vlog
comments and the differences of impoliteness strategies used by male and female
viewers in vlog comments. This research is qualitative. It is analysed descriptively
based on related theory of Culpeper’s (1996) impoliteness strategy to assess the
differences in frequency of impoliteness strategies by male and female. This study
employed Pearson’s Chi-Square (X2) in the 0,05% of significant differences. The
data in this research are written utterance containing impoliteness strategies used
in vlog comments published in 2016. The data source of this research is comments
of video blogging The Late Late Show. The writer shows the result of the data by
table percentages of each super strategy they are bald on record impoliteness
10.8%, positive impoliteness 59.7%, negative impoliteness 20%, sarcasm or mock
politeness 5.2%, and combination of impoliteness 4.3%. There are 230 cases of
impoliteness in the vlog comments in The Late Late Show. From the data analysis
can be concluded that male is more impolite than female.
Keywords: Impoliteness strategies, utterances, commentators, vlog comments.
xiii
LIST OF TABLE
2.3 Table the Types of Criticism
4.C Table The Differences between Male and Female using Impoliteness
Strategies
4.D Table the Summary of the Findings
xiv
LIST OF APPENDIXES
1. Bald-On Record Impoliteness
2. Positive Impoliteness
3. Negative Impoliteness
4. Sarcasm or Mock Politeness
5. Combination Strategies
xv
THESIS
Submitted to the Department of Language Studies,
Graduate School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the degree of Master of Education
Written by :
IKA RATNA ROSANTI
S 200100039
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE STUDIES
GRADUATE SCHOOL
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
2016
APPROVAL
IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG
THESIS
Proposed by:
Ika Ratna Rosanti
S 200100039
Approved by:
Primary Supervisor
Second Supervisor
Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D
Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D
ii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROSVAL FORM
The student submits the thesis for examination:
Name
: Ika Ratna Rosanti
ID Number : S 200100039
Department : Languages Studies
Field of Study : English Education
Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog
Suppervisor’s Approval:
I confirm that the thesis written by the above-named student meets the scholarly
standard for the degree and is therefore eligible to proceed to an examination by
the board of examiners of the Department od Language Studies, the Graduate
School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Surakarta,
April 2017
Primary Supervisor,
Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D
iii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROSVAL FORM
The student submits the thesis for examination:
Name
: Ika Ratna Rosanti
ID Number : S 200100039
Department : Languages Studies
Field of Study : English Education
Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog
Suppervisor’s Approval:
I confirm that the thesis written by the above-named student meets the scholarly
standard for the degree and is therefore eligible to proceed to an examination by
the board of examiners of the Department od Language Studies, the Graduate
School of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Surakarta,
April 2017
Second Supervisor,
Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D
iv
APPOVAL OF THESIS FOR SUBMISSION
IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG
Submitted by:
Ika Ratna Rosanti
Has been examined by the board of examiners on April 2017. All feedback,
corrections, and suggestions recommended by the examiners have been
considered and revision has been accordingly made by the student.
The boards of examiners certify that the thesis is eligible for submission.
The Board of Examiners
Primary Supervisor
Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D
Co-Supervisor
Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D
Examiner
Dr. Anam Sutopo, M.Hum
Surakarta, April 2017
The Director of Graduate School
Prof. Dr. Khudzaifah Dimyati
v
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP
I hereby confirm that the thesis entitled “Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog” is an
original and authentic work written by myself and it has satisfied the rules and
regulations of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta with respect to plagiarism.
I certify that all quotations and the source of the information have been fully
referred and acknowledged accordingly.
I confirm that this thesis has not been submitted for the award of any previous
degree in any tertiary institution in Indonesia or abroad.
Name
: Ika Ratna Rosanti
ID Number : S 200100039
Department : Languages Studies
Field of Study : English Education
Thesis Title : Impoliteness in Criticism in Vlog
Date
:
April 2017
Signed :
(Ika Ratna Rosanti)
vi
MOTTOS
“Man Jadda Wa Jadda.”
“Those who do it seriously will be successful.”
-Arabian Proverb“Do your best and let God do the rest.”
-Ben Carson“I am thankful for all of those who said NO to me. It’s because of them I’m doing
it myself”
-Albert Einstein-
vii
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to:
My beloved husband
My beloved parents
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin, all praises just for Allah SWT, the lord of universe,
the one who sent the messenger Muhammad SAW to guide human to safest
religion, Islam. Thanks for blessing her in the thesis entitled “Impoliteness in
Criticim in Vlog”.
The writer would like to express her great gratitude and appreciation to:
1. Prof. Dr. Markhamah, M.Hum., as the head of language study
department of graduate program in Muhammadiyah University of
Surakarta.
2. Agus Wijayanto, Ph.D., the academic supervisor and the primary
supervisor, who has given great help, guidance, advice, and correction from
the beginning up to the completion of this research paper.
3. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph.D., as the co-supervisor who patiently gave
her guidance and motivation.
4. Her beloved husband, who always accompany, support, and pray with
love.
5. Her beloved parents, who always pray, love, and give support.
6. Her beloved friends, who always pray and give support.
Last but not least, the writer realizes that this research is still far from being
perfect. Therefore, suggestion and positive criticism are hoped and needed to
make this research better.
The writer hopes that this research paper can contribute to useful reading for the
esteemed readers.
Wassalamu’alaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
Surakarta, April 2017
The Writer,
Ika Ratna Rosanti.
ix
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE ...............................................................................................................
i
APPROVAL .....................................................................................................
ii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM .......................................................... iii
SUPERVISOR’S APPROVAL FORM .......................................................... iv
APPROVAL OF THESIS SUBMISSION .....................................................
v
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP ................................................................ vi
MOTTO ............................................................................................................ vii
DEDICATION .................................................................................................. viii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................. ix
TABLE OF CONTENT ...................................................................................
x
ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... xii
LIST OF TABLE ............................................................................................. xiv
LIST OF APPENDIX ...................................................................................... xiv
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................
1
A. Background of the Study ..........................................................................
1
B. Limitation of the Study .............................................................................
6
C. Problem Statement ....................................................................................
6
D. Objective of the Study ..............................................................................
7
E. Benefit of the Study ..................................................................................
7
1. Theoretical Benefit ...............................................................................
7
2. Practical Benefit ....................................................................................
7
F. Research Paper Organization ....................................................................
7
CHAPTER II
UNDERLYING THEORY .........................................................................
9
A. Previous Study ..........................................................................................
9
B. Related Theory .......................................................................................... 18
1. Pragmatics ............................................................................................. 18
a. Sociopragmatic ................................................................................. 20
b. Pragmalinguistic .............................................................................. 20
2. Speech Act ............................................................................................ 21
x
a. Types of Speech Act ........................................................................ 21
b. Classification of Speech Act ............................................................ 22
3. Criticism ............................................................................................... 23
4. Impoliteness .......................................................................................... 28
a. Impoliteness Strategy ....................................................................... 29
b. Impoliteness and Responses to It ..................................................... 34
5. Computer Mediated Communication ................................................... 37
6. Language Gender ................................................................................. 41
7. Video Blogging ..................................................................................... 42
C. Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. 43
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................................. 44
A. Research Type ........................................................................................... 44
B. Research Object ........................................................................................ 44
C. Data and Data Source ............................................................................... 44
D. Technique of Collecting Data ................................................................... 44
E. Data Validity ............................................................................................. 45
F. Technique of Analyzing the Data ............................................................. 46
CHAPTER IV
FINDING AND DISCUSSION ................................................................... 47
A. Introduction .............................................................................................. 47
B. Types of Impoliteness Strategies .............................................................. 47
C. The Differences of Impoliteness Strategies used by Male and Female .... 77
D. The Findings ............................................................................................. 79
E. Discussion of The Findings ...................................................................... 82
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ....................................................... 85
A. Conclusion ............................................................................................... 85
B. Pedagogical Implication .......................................................................... 86
C. Suggestion ............................................................................................... 86
BIBLIOGRAPY
APPENDIXES
xi
ABSTRAK
Ika Ratna Rosanti. S 200100039. IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG.
Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2016.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan strategi ketidaksantunan
pada komentar di vlog. Penulis mendeskripsikan apa saja strategi ketidaksantunan
yang digunakan pada komentar di vlog dan apa saja perbedaan strategi
ketidaksantunan yang digunakan oleh komentator laki-laki dan perempuan pada
komentar di vlog. Ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif. Penulis menganalisis
ketidaksantunan secara deskriptif berdasarkan teori ketidaksantunan yang
dikemukakan oleh Culpeper (1996) untuk menilai perbedaan frekuensi strategi
ketidaksantunan oleh laki-laki dan perempuan. Penelitian ini menggunakan
Pearson Chi-Suare pada 0.05% dari perbedaan yang signifikan. Data dari
penelitian ini adalah penulisan ujaran yang mengandung strategi ketidaksantunan
yang digunakan pada komentar di vlog. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah
komentar dari video blogging pada acara The Late Late Show. Penulis
memperlihatkan hasil penelitian dengan tabel presentase dari setiap sub strategi
yang diantaranya adalah 10,8% ketidaksantunan secara langsung, 59,7%
ketidaksantunan positif, 20% ketidaksantunan negatif, 5,2% penggunaan sindiran,
dan 4,3% ketidaksantunan kombinasi. Penulis menemukan 230 total data dari
keseluruhan analisis ketidaksantunan pada komentar di vlog The Late Late Show.
Dari analisis data dapat disimpulkan bahwa laki-laki lebih banyak melakukan
ketidaksantunan dibandingkan perempuan.
Kata Kunci: Strategi ketidaksantunan, ujaran, komentator, komentar vlog.
xii
ABSTRACT
Ika Ratna Rosanti. S 200100039. IMPOLITENESS IN CRITICISM IN VLOG.
Thesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2016.
This research aims to analyse the use of impoliteness strategies in vlog comment.
The writer describes the types of impoliteness strategies used in the vlog
comments and the differences of impoliteness strategies used by male and female
viewers in vlog comments. This research is qualitative. It is analysed descriptively
based on related theory of Culpeper’s (1996) impoliteness strategy to assess the
differences in frequency of impoliteness strategies by male and female. This study
employed Pearson’s Chi-Square (X2) in the 0,05% of significant differences. The
data in this research are written utterance containing impoliteness strategies used
in vlog comments published in 2016. The data source of this research is comments
of video blogging The Late Late Show. The writer shows the result of the data by
table percentages of each super strategy they are bald on record impoliteness
10.8%, positive impoliteness 59.7%, negative impoliteness 20%, sarcasm or mock
politeness 5.2%, and combination of impoliteness 4.3%. There are 230 cases of
impoliteness in the vlog comments in The Late Late Show. From the data analysis
can be concluded that male is more impolite than female.
Keywords: Impoliteness strategies, utterances, commentators, vlog comments.
xiii
LIST OF TABLE
2.3 Table the Types of Criticism
4.C Table The Differences between Male and Female using Impoliteness
Strategies
4.D Table the Summary of the Findings
xiv
LIST OF APPENDIXES
1. Bald-On Record Impoliteness
2. Positive Impoliteness
3. Negative Impoliteness
4. Sarcasm or Mock Politeness
5. Combination Strategies
xv