UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD ANNUAL PROGRAMME REVIEW REPORT 200506 - POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES
Completed report to be maximum six sides in length – Download a copy of this form from : www.academic.salford.ac.ukaqaformsapr_report_pg.doc
1. Programme title and award……………………………...……………..………………………. 2. School………………………………………………………………..……………………………
3. Name of Programme Leader………………………………………………..…………………. 4. Name of person completing this form…………………………………………….…………
5. Summarise how the programme team was involved in producing this report ……… ……………………………………………………………………………………………………...
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6. Background
information
E.g. duration of programme, mode of attendance, how long it has been running, any special features:
7. Review of previous years action plan Action Achieved
Person responsible
Comments
8. Programme Statistics
Note: for definitions of categories see: www.academic.salford.ac.ukaqaapr_definition_cats_pg.pdf
Student Profile 20032004
20042005 20052006
Female APLAPEL
Declared disability International
Progression 20032004 20042005
20052006 N
o
Applicants N
o
Offers N
o
Registrations N
o
Withdrawn Leaving with PG Cert.
Leaving with PG Dip. Referred on taught elements
Progression to Masters Submitting dissertation
Awarded Masters Source of Funding
20032004 20042005
20052006 Self-funding
Employer funded ESF
Other
04 Internal Review Scheme - Page 7 of 41
Note: In sections 9-15 strengths and weaknesses should be highlighted.
9. Comments on statistics
What were the patterns in recruitment, entry profile, progression and completion rates? Any changes from previous years? Destinations of students? Stability of funding
sources? How do these figures relate to appropriate national or subject benchmark indicators?
10. Student Feedback What were the results of evaluative questionnaires and of any other feedback methods
used? What were the main issues raised by students? Action taken.
11. Staff Feedback
What substantive comments have been made by staff on the way the programme has operated this year?
12. External Examiners CommentsReports
What comments were made by External Examiners? What action was taken or not taken in response? Reasons should be given for any action not taken.
13. Collaborative Arrangements Programmes which have external links, e.g., a franchise, must comment on the operation
of the collaborative arrangement. 14. Changes to the Programme
Summarise any changes made to the programme during the year and give the rationale behind them.
15. Any other information
Anything else relevant to the Review – for example, external accreditation and review PSRBQAA, ways in which the programme has responded to equality and diversity
requirements including issues of accessibility. Also any lessons drawn from outcomes of Boards of Appeal, induction activities, subject updating, links with research,
developments in work-based learning, employer liaison and opinion, international dimension, programme delivery, staffing, physical resources and facilities, staff
development, alumni feedback.
16. Summary of strengths good practice which goes beyond the Universitys minimum requirements
