Earnings Quality THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT THE INFLUENCE OF THE LEVEL OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURES TO EARNINGS QUALITY.

14 parties Sanjaya and Young, 2012. This condition will result in the magnitude of the opportunity manager, to do things that are beneficial to their interests Palguna Putra, 2013. There are two major types of information asymmetry Scott, 2009. First is adverse selection. Adverse selection is a type of information asymmetry whereby one or more parties to a business transaction, or potential transaction, have an information advantage over other parties. The second is moral hazard. Moral hazard is a type of information asymmetry whereby one or more parties to a business transaction, or potential transaction, can observe their actions in fulfillment of the transaction but other parties cannot.

2.5 Earnings Quality

Earnings quality is an indicator of the quality of financial information. High quality financial information is derived from the high quality of financial reporting Surifah, 2010. Earnings quality refers to the ability of reported earnings to reflect the companys true earnings, as well as the usefulness of reported earnings to predict future earnings. Earnings quality also refers to the stability, persistence and lack of variability in reported earnings. The evaluation of earnings quality is often difficult, because companies highlight a variety of earnings figures: revenues, operating earnings, net income, and pro forma earnings Bellovary et al, 2005. Barragato and Markelevick 2008, states that earnings quality is of interest to users of financial statements because earnings are utilized in making contracting and investment decisions. Earnings quality means different things to different users of financial statements. There are two majo jo r r t types of informa ti ti on on asymmetry Scott, 2009. First is adverse selecti ti o on. Adverse selection is a type of f i i nf n ormation asymmetry whereby on n e e or more parties to to a a b b us us in in es es s s tr r an an sa s ction, or pote tent n ial transaction, have a an inform m ation ad ad va vantage over other parties s . Th The seco co nd is mo moral hazard. M Moral haza zard rd i i s a ty y pe pe o f information as ymmetry wh her er eby one e or or m m ore pa a rt r ies to a bu u si sine ness s tra a n ns action , or potential t ransaction, ca n ob se e rv rv e th h ei e r r a actions s in fu u lf lfi illment t of the transac ti on but other p arties can no t. 2. 2. 5 5 Ear rn ings Q ua lity Earnings quali ty is an i nd ic ator of th e qual it y of financial i informati tion n . Hi High gh q q uality fin anci al i nf orma ti on is derive d fr om t he h igh quality of f f i inanci c al al reporting Sur if if h ah, 2010 . Ea Ea rn rnin in gs q q ua uali li ty ty r f efers to t t h he ability of repo o rt rt ed ed ea ea rn rn ings to reflect the companys true earnings, as well as the useful ul ne ne ss ss o of re re po port rt ed ed e e ar ar ni ni ng ng s s to to p p re re di di ct ct f f ut ut ur ur e e earn n in in gs gs . Ea Ea rn rn in in gs gs q q ua ua li li ty ty a a ls ls o o re refe fe rs rs t to o the stab abil l it it y, y, p p er er si si st sten ence a a nd nd lack of of varia bi bility i i n n reported ed e e arni ning ng s. s. T T he he e e v valu lu at ion of earnings quality is often difficu ult, becau use companies highlight a variety of earnings figures: revenues, op e erating ea r rnings, net income, and pro forma earnings Bellovary et al, 2005. Ba B rrag g a ato and Markelevick 2008, states that earnings quality is of interest to users s o of financial statements because earnings are 15 So far, no definitive measure or appropriate to measure the quality of earnings of a financial statement, only an approach that is being used to proxy the quality of earnings. Therefore, earnings quality measure used by the researchers could be different with other researchers Surifah, 2010. This research will use earnings management through discretionary accruals as the proxy of earnings quality.

2.6 Positive Accounting Theory