segmentation proCess using threshoLDing

ISSN: 2180 - 1843 Vol. 3 No. 2 July-December 2011 Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering 6 image histogram. The maximum peak is located at 0.1. Ater applying Gamma-law transformation algorithm, the histogram has been enhanced in which the peak is located at 0.4 as shown in Fig. 6c. On the other hand, the maximum peak is located at 0.2 for contrast stretching as shown Fig. 6d. γ γ vel, r γ sed on The prove es. Unlike to a xel, the ation 5 = 6 r this mage es will have 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 a Image and histogram of intensity normalization 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 100 200 300 400 500 b Image and histogram of background removal 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 50 100 150 200 250 c Image and histogram of Gamma-law transformation 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 50 100 150 200 250 d Image and histogram of contrast stretching Fig. 6 Pre-processing steps Fig. 6 Pre-processing steps

v. segmentation proCess using threshoLDing

teChniQue For the image segmentation process, irstly the entire image is divided by 8 x 8 regions where 256 x 256 pixels of the entire image is split to 16 x 16 pixels size in each region. Fig. 7 shows the image spliting block processing with 16 x 16 pixels size per segment. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Fig. 7 Image splitting 16 x 16 pixels size per segment = ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = Fig. 7 Image spliting 16 x 16 pixels size per segment Region 46 which is indicated by red circle is the lesion, examine by neuroradiologist. Next, histogram is calculated at each region as shown in Fig. 8. The red circle shows the histogram distribution of lesion, whereas the others are histogram of normal brain area. 0.5 1 1000 2000 1 0.5 1 1000 2000 2 0.5 1 1000 2000 3 0.5 1 1000 2000 4 0.5 1 1000 2000 5 0.5 1 1000 2000 6 0.5 1 1000 2000 7 0.5 1 1000 2000 8 0.5 1 1000 2000 9 0.5 1 1000 2000 10 0.5 1 500 1000 11 0.5 1 500 1000 12 0.5 1 500 1000 13 0.5 1 1000 2000 14 0.5 1 1000 2000 15 0.5 1 1000 2000 16 0.5 1 1000 2000 17 0.5 1 1000 2000 18 0.5 1 200 400 19 0.5 1 50 20 0.5 1 20 40 21 0.5 1 200 400 22 0.5 1 1000 2000 23 0.5 1 1000 2000 24 0.5 1 1000 2000 25 0.5 1 500 1000 26 0.5 1 20 40 27 0.5 1 20 40 28 0.5 1 20 40 29 0.5 1 50 100 30 0.5 1 500 1000 31 0.5 1 1000 2000 32 0.5 1 1000 2000 33 0.5 1 500 1000 34 0.5 1 20 40 35 0.5 1 50 36 0.5 1 50 100 37 0.5 1 20 40 38 0.5 1 500 1000 39 0.5 1 1000 2000 40 0.5 1 1000 2000 41 0.5 1 500 1000 42 0.5 1 50 100 43 0.5 1 50 100 44 0.5 1 20 40 45 0.5 1 20 40 46 0.5 1 500 1000 47 0.5 1 1000 2000 48 0.5 1 1000 2000 49 0.5 1 1000 2000 50 0.5 1 500 1000 51 0.5 1 200 400 52 0.5 1 200 400 53 0.5 1 500 1000 54 0.5 1 1000 2000 55 0.5 1 1000 2000 56 0.5 1 1000 2000 57 0.5 1 1000 2000 58 0.5 1 1000 2000 59 0.5 1 1000 2000 60 0.5 1 1000 2000 61 0.5 1 1000 2000 62 0.5 1 1000 2000 63 0.5 1 1000 2000 64 Fig. 8 Histogram distribution of each region = ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = Fig. 8 Histogram distribution of each region Two histograms which are normal and abnormal lesion are then generated. All normal and abnormal regions are overlap respectively to ind the maximum number of pixels at each intensity level. The maximum number of pixels is calculated by using the function shown in equation 7. n , m R : 1 R MaxPixels Pixelsn Max = Where n is the intensity at level n, R1 and Rm are ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = = 7 are regions in ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = Where n is the intensity at level n, R1 and Rm are regions in the block histogram according to each intensity level. The purpose of overlapping the histogram ISSN: 2180 - 1843 Vol. 3 No. 2 July-December 2011 Brain Lesion Segmentation from Difusion-weighted MRI based on Adaptive Thresholding and Gray Level 7 for each block is to enhance the lesion for comparison with normal. This will produce a new histogram as shown in Fig. 9. The optimal threshold is determined by the ROI indicator, which the intensity level of normal histogram is reached zero pixels. = 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 5 10 15 20 25 Fig 9 Optimal threshold with Gamma-law enhancement ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = Optimal Threshold Normal Abnormal Fig 9 Optimal threshold with Gamma-law enhancement Fig. 10 shows the maximum block histogram, which is done by overlapping the histogram in all blocks including both normal and abnormal. By using the proposed technique, we can clearly characterize the lesion area because it has been enhanced. sion, d at the are = 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 5 10 15 20 25 Fig 10 Maximum block histogram ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = Lesion Fig 10 Maximum block histogram The statistical features representing the hyperintense and hypointense regions are then calculated according to equation 8, where T optimal is the threshold value to obtain the segmentation. = elsewhere , for 1 int , ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = optimal T y x I ense hyper y x I = ⎩⎨ ⎧ ≥ = 8 vi. segmentation proCess using gLCm Fig. 11 shows an example of GLCM for image in Fig. 1c. The image has hyperintense lesion due to acute infarction. The GLCM is computed for Ng=128, d=1 and at average orientations, and is represented in a contour plot. Colour intensity represents the co- occurrence frequencies, or the number of repetitions between each pixel pair, u and v. It can be seen that hypointense region and CSF occur at smaller co-occurrence entry; normal brain tissue is located in the middle of the matrix, while hyperintense region exists at higher entry. The red dash-line shows a cross-section at u=v. At this line, the co-occurrence frequency is the highest. The plot also shows that the co-occurrence frequencies are diagonally symmetry and the gray level resolutions are brighter when the co-occurrence transitions increase of-diagonally with the matrix. Averaged GLCM contour plot gray level,v g ra y l e v e l, u 20 40 60 80 100 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Fig. 11 GLCM for DWI in Fig. 1c ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ ≥ ≥ = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ ≤ ≤ = ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ ∑∑ = = ⎩ ⎨ ⎧ = + + + = φ = + = = Hypointense region Normal brain tissue Hyperintense region T T T 1 T 1 T 2 T 2 1 2 3 1, 2

1, 3 3, 2

3, 1 2, 1

2, 3

Fig. 11 GLCM for DWI in Fig. 1c

a. minimum and maximum threshold