Topographic correction method isprsarchives XL 1 W3 447 2013

Tehran.

2. Data and Method

We used all SAR data including descending and ascending orbits for the Envisat between 2003 and 2009 and ascending orbit for ALOS in dual polarization mode between 2007 and 2009 for our study area Fig. 1. We selected this region because of potential volcanic and landslide hazards around Damavand Volcano. In this paper we focused on 2 landslide targets located in KAH and EMZ shown in Figure 1 and evaluate the effectiveness of our modified method MSBAS by comparing the results with those derived from SBAS method implemented in StaMPS Hooper et al., 2004. Figure 1: Left: Photo of Damavand Volcano, as viewed from east, Right: Deformation field velocity of Envisat satellite as obtained in descending. The location of the KAHR and EMZ are depicted. Due the effect of geometric decorrelation on the accuracy of unwrapping process, we used a modified phase filtering with the aim of smoothing each SBAS pairs before unwrapping. However, despite of using modified filter and because of strong geometric decorrelation in rough terrain area, some areas still remained noisy. Therefore, we only selected correlated areas from each SBAS pairs. In this regard, we applied a unique mask for all of the SBAS pairs during 3D unwrapping and used the designed mask in all unwrapping steps to improve the results. We refined the Delauny triangulation and removed edges lying beyond masked areas during time unwrapping. We also applied the same mask for the regularly gridded data that is interpolated from PS pixels during spatial unwrapping. Due to the sensitivity of interferomatric phase to the digital elevation models DEMs errors, especially for ALOS dataset, and because the Nyquist condition for time unwrapping will not be met if there are any spatially uncorrelated terms, the correct detection of the topographic errors in the time-series of interferograms is a critical step. StaMPS software ignores the topographic correction before unwrapping and only detects the topographic errors after unwrapping process. In StaMPS, irregularly sampled PS pixels are unwrapped using 3D unwrapping algorithms. The algorithm unwraps time series pixels in both time and space domain separately. In time domain, the StaMPS algorithm works very well only for well sampled case in which Nyquist assumption is satisfied, but has problem for rough terrain areas where phase is undersampled in time due to topographic, atmospheric and noise effects or errors. Therefore, we modified StaMPS 3D unwrapping algorithm to overcome these problems. Similar to StaMPS, unwrapping in time domain is the first step in our algorithm. The algorithm defines edges connecting data points using Delaunay triangulation and then calculates edge phase differences. In this way only spatially correlated effects including atmospheric and orbital errors are removed but there remain several time undersampled areas due to topographic errors that has to be corrected. StaMPS solution for adjusting these areas time undersampled areas is to apply the averaging filter in time domain, regardless of the source of error. In our algorithm, in contrast to StaMPS, topographic correction is performed on the measured edge phase differences difference map. We reduce the phase component correlated with the perpendicular baselines from each phase difference map due to the possible topographic noise errors to make the phase difference as small as possible. Our algorithm also could detect the correlation between topography and phase data due to the tropospheric delay, and remove it after unwrapping process. In addition, the possible precise orbit errors were removed by fitting a best plane on four GPS permanent stations available in our study area.

3. Topographic correction method

Let us first consider components constitute interferometric phase. These parameters are the phases introduced by the topographic effect  topo , the phase difference due to deformation between the two acquisitions  def , the atmospheric phase delay  atmo , orbit errors  orbit , and noise term  noise eq. 1. j = j def + j topo + j orb + j atm + j noise 1 The main objective is to separate phase contributions due to deformation j def from other terms. Deformation information can be accurately estimated from SAR observation if a true elevation model DEM of the area is available. Any factor that limits DEM accuracy whether due to instrument or methods used for topographic measuring and also possible changes in Earths topography during time series interval could be affect phase unwrapping performance and consequently reduces the derived deformation accuracy. There are linear relationship between the phase shifts caused by DEM error or topographic changes and perpendicular baselines Samsonov., 2010 eq. 2. e e topo Z r B sin t , t 4 = t , t j i j i       2 Where e topo   is the phase component due to the error in the DEM, t , t j i  B is perpendicular baseline between the two time acquisition i t and j t , r is SAR range between SAR sensor and target, θ in the look angle and e Z is the DEM error. We assume DEM error component dominate the measured phase shift, since other terms which uncorrelated in time including atmospheric, orbital, thermal noise, and so on have already been removed by differencing between nearby pixels. The pixels with strong correlation between phase and baselines are found as pixels which include DEM error. To estimate residual topographic ratio sin 4    r Z e , by taking that in equation 2 we applied linear regression between the calculated term e topo  and  B . Damavand Volcano KAH EMZ SMPR 2013, 5 – 8 October 2013, Tehran, Iran This contribution has been peer-reviewed. The peer-review was conducted on the basis of the abstract. 448 4. Results 4.1 Envisat descending results