Introduction Research Design Sampling Technique

65

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Introduction

This is a purely qualitative research. The methodology was therefore designed to strive for in- depth information about purposeful samples without special regard to the issue of generalization. This is reflected below in the research design, sampling technique, instruments for data collection, and data analysis procedures.

2.2 Research Design

The descriptive sample survey design was used for the study. This is because the design offered the opportunity to observe phenomena as they happen or exist in their natural state and report what is, not what ought to be.

2.3 Sampling Technique

Both non-probability and probability sampling procedures were used in selecting the sample. Under non-probability sampling the purposive sampling technique was employed in selecting: i Chiefs and their elders ii Chief Fishermen iii Chief Priests and Priestesses iv Canoe Owners v Boatswains vi Christian Religious Leaders • Probability Sampling • Simple random sampling was used in selecting subjects from the population of ordinary fishermen. The basic characteristic for selection of subjects was six months and above of continuous fishing experience. Sample Size A total of 132 respondents were interviewed. The categories of respondents are as provided in the table below. Table 1- 0-D: Categories of respondents by communities Categories Communities Total Busua Lower Axim Upper Axim Apewosika Chief 1 2 - 1 4 Elders 3 2 5 3 12 Chief Fishermen 2 4 1 1 8 Traditional Priest Priestess 1 1 - 1 3 Canoe Owners 3 4 2 2 11 Boatswains 6 15 1 1 23 Ordinary Fishermen 20 30 10 5 65 Christian Religious Leaders 2 2 - 1 5 Total 38 60 19 15 132 Source: Fieldwork, 2010. A total number of 132 respondents were interviewed. Ordinary fishermen form almost the majority 65 out of 132 of respondents interviewed. However, only three traditional priests 66 priestesses were interviewed. As many as sixty of the 132 respondents were interviewed in Lower Axim alone, whereas the remaining were distributed among the other three communities, with Apewosika recording the least of 15 respondents See Table 1.

2.4 Data Collection Procedure Instruments