RESULT AND DISCUSSION 4.1. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 5.1.

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION 4.1.

Descriptive Statistics Analysis 4.1.1. Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Guided- Inquiry Learning Model 4.1.2. Students Mathematics Achievement Taught By Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw 4.2. Analysis of Research Data 4.2.1 Normality Test 4.2.2 Homogeneity Test 4.3. Hypothesis Test 4.4. Discussion 4.5. Weakness of Study

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 5.1.

Conclusion 5.2. Suggestion REFERENCES APPENDICES 37 38 39 40 40 41 41 43 44 45 45 46 48 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Table 2.2 Table 3.1 Table 4.1 Table 4.2 Table 4.3 Table 4.4 Table 4.5 Table 4.6 Table 4.7 What Guided Inquiry Is Not and Is Comparison of Four Type of Cooperative Learning Blue-Print of Mathematics Achievement Test Summary of Descriptive Statistics Each Experiment Classes Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Guided - Inquiry Learning Model Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw Normality Test of Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Guided-Inquiry Learning Model Normality Test of Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw F-Test for Guided-Inquiry Learning Model and Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw Summary Calculation of t-Test for Normal and Homogen Data Pages 16 18 30 37 38 39 40 40 41 42 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Figure 2.4 Figure 2.5 Figure 2.6 Figure 2.7 Figure 3.1 Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 Students Answer of Initial Test The Relationship between Home and Expert Team The Distance Between Two Points The Distance of Point To Line Distance of Point to the Plane The Distance Between Two Parallel Lines The Distance Between Two Crossing Lines The Distance From Line To Plane That Parallel Experimental Design Figure Bar Chart of Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Guided-Inquiry Learning Model Bar Chart of Students Mathematics Achievement Taught by Cooperative Learning Type Jigsaw Pages 3 19 21 22 23 23 23 24 29 38 39 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7 Appendix 8 Appendix 9 Appendix 10 Appendix 11 Appendix 12 Appendix 13 Appendix 14 Appendix 15 Appendix 16 Appendix 17 Appendix 18 Appendix 19 Appendix 20 Appendix 21 Appendix 22 Lesson Plan Experiment Class 1 1 st Meeting Lesson Plan Experiment Class 1 2 nd Meeting Lesson Plan Experiment Class 2 1 st Meeting Lesson Plan Experiment Class 2 2 nd Meeting Worksheet A Experiment Class 1 Worksheet B Experiment Class 1 Worksheet C Experiment Class 2 Worksheet D Experiment Class 2 Blue Print of Mathematics Achievement Test Mathematics Achievement Test Alternative Solution of Mathematics Achievement Test Mathematics Test Data of Students in Trial Class Validity of Students Mathematics Achievement in Trial Class Reliability of Students Mathematics Achievement in Trial Class Difficulty Level Index and Distinguishing Power Index of Each Item in Trial Class Code Name and Attendance of Students in Experiment Class 1 Code Name and Attendance of Students in Experiment Class 2 Data Result of Students Mathematics Achievement Normality Test Homogeneity Test Hypothesis Test Pages 48 51 54 58 61 66 70 77 83 84 85 91 96 97 99 101 102 103 104 106 109 110 Appendix 23 Appendix 24 Appendix 25 Appendix 26 Appendix 27 Appendix 28 Table of r-Product Moment Table of Z Distribution Table of F Distribution Table of t Distribution Documentations Requirement Letters 112 113 114 116 117 119

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF ROUNDTABLE MODEL IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 ARJASA IN THE 2005 / 2006 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 4 92

THE EFFECT OF USING ROUNDTABLE TECHNIQUE IN COOPERATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING ON TENSE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EIGHTH YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 JENGGAWAH IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR YEAR STUDENTS AT SMPN 1 JENGGAWAH IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR YEAR STUDENTS AT

0 4 16

THE EFFECT OF USING STUDENTS TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT AT SMA NEGERI TEMPEH LUMAJANG

0 5 14

THE EFFECT OF USING STUDENTS TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT AT SMA NEGERI TEMPEH LUMAJANG

0 2 14

THE EFFECT OF USING STUDENTS TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT AT SMA NEGERI TEMPEH LUMAJANG

0 2 14

THE EFFECT OF USING STUDENTS TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON THE ELEVENTH YEAR STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT AT SMA NEGERI TEMPEH LUMAJANG

0 4 66

THE INFLUENCE OF STUDENTS MOTIVATION AND ATTITUDE TOWARD ENGLISH LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT AT FIRST GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 10 BANDAR LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2011-2012

0 8 35

THE INFLUENCE OF STUDENTS MOTIVATION AND ATTITUDE TOWARD ENGLISH LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT AT FIRST GRADE OF SMA NEGERI 10 BANDAR LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2011-2012

0 6 50

THE DIFFERENCES OF ECONOMICS LEARNING ACHIEVEMEN TAUGHT THROUGH JIGSAW AND STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS COOPERATIVE LEARNING BYREGARDING STUDENTS LEARNING MOTIVATION OF XII IPS CLASS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NEGERI 5 METRO By

0 19 15

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT BY USING GUIDED-DISCOVERY AND COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL JIGSAW TYPE

0 0 10