3.6.3 Difficulty Index 46
3.6.4 Discrimination Index 47
3.6.5 Distructror Index 47
3.7 Data Collection and Analysis 48
3.7.1 Normality Test 49
3.7.2 Homogenity Test 50
3.7.3 Normalized Gain 50
3.7.4 Effectiveness of student’s achivement 50
3.8 Hypothesis Testing 50
CHAPTER IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION 50
4.1 Description of CTL in Hydrocarbon Topic 51
4.2 Analysis of Instrument Data 52
4.2.1 Validation 53
4.2.2 Realibility 54
4.2.3 Difficulty Index 54
4.2.4 Discrimination Index 54
4.2.5 Distructor Index 54
4.3 Result Data of Research 56
4.3.1 Student’s character communicative 56
4.3.2 Result of Experiment Class 57
4.3.3 Result of Control Class 57
4.3.4 Result Data of Gain 58
4.4 Analysis Test of Data 58
4.4.1 Normality Test 58
4.4.1.1. Student’s Character 59
4.4.1.2 Student’s Achievement 59
4.4.2 Homogenity Test 59
4.4 .2.1 Student’s Character
60 4.4.2.2 Student’sAchievement
60 4.4.3 Hypothesis Test
60 4.4.3.1 Hypothesis Test 1
61 4.4.3.2 Hypothesis Test 2
61 4.4.4 Increasing Student’s Achievement
62 4.4.5
Effectiveness of Student’s Achievement 63
4.5. Discussion 63
CHAPTER V . CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 66
5.1 Conclusion 66
5.2 Suggestion 67
REFERENCES
68
LIST OF TABLE
Table 3.1 Population of Research 37
Table 3.2 Sample of Resesarch 38
Table 3.3 Design of Research 39
Table 3.4 Categorized of Content Validity 45
Table 4.1 Description of CTL in Hydrocarbon 52
Table 4.2 Summary of Analysis of Instrument Test 55
Table 4.3 Student’s Character communicative
56 Table 4.4 Result of Experiment Class
57 Table 4.5 Result of Control Class
57 Table 4.6 Result Data of Gain
58 Table 4.7
Normality Data of Student’s Character. 59
Table 4.8 Normality Test of Student’s Character
59 Table 4.9
Homogenity Test of Student’s Character 60
Table 4.10 Homogenity T est of Student’s Achievement
60 Table 4.11 Hypothesis T
est of Student’s Achievement 61
Table 4.12 Hypothesis Test of Student’s Character
62
