lxxii If there was a question, the teacher answered the students’ question. On the contrary, if
there was no question, the teacher ended the class.
c. Observing The researcher recorded the important occurrences during the teaching learning
process. Her collaborator helped her to observe student’s activities during the teaching learning process. Therefore, she gave some inputs or suggestions. She noted the lack
and superiority of the implementation of the lesson plan using BCCT method as the teaching technique. She noted the result of observation from first meeting to fourth
meeting.
d. Reflecting After carrying out the teaching learning activities using learning by doing by
implementing BCCT method, the writer recited the occurrences in the classroom as the effect of the action. She evaluated the process and the result of the implementing BCCT
method in teaching English, including the weakness and strength with collaborator and classroom teacher. The evaluation benefits to give recommendation what the
researcher should do in the next cycle.
E. Data and Source of Data
There were two kinds of data the writer used, the quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data were in the forms of language ability score. The data were
students’ score from the beginning of the research up to the end of the research. It came from the regular assessment.
The qualitative data were information in the forms of students’ responses, observation reports, colleague inputs, and field notes. There were three sources of data:
lxxiii 1 event, the teaching learning process in natural setting; 2 respondents, the students,
teachers, colleagues, teacher’s diaries, the result of discussion with collaborator, field note observation; and 3 document, the result of students work sheet pre - test and post-
test.
F. Technique of Collecting Data
The writer needed two kinds of the data, quantitative and qualitative data. The writer found quantitative data by doing test. The instrument of test was based on the blue
print. The data are found from administering pre-test, regular test after some teaching learning processes and post-test. In finding qualitative data, the writer did direct
observation in the classroom, interviewed the teachers, interviewed the students regarding to their activities in studying English by implementing BCCT method, and held
meeting with colleagues to find out the students’ improvement. The writer used tape recorder, handycam, photograph, interview, portfolios, and
field notes. There were three ratters in collecting the data; they were the researcher, collaborator, and the classroom teacher. After conducting test, they would discuss the
result then the result was the combination opinion from the researcher, collaborator, and the classroom teacher’s discussions and considerations.
G. Technique of Analyzing Data
There were two technique in analyzing data, quantitative and qualitative. In quantitative technique of analyzing data, the writer used the students’ previous mark
pre-test and in the end of the lesson, the writer gave the students post-test in order to know whether BCCT method could improve the students’ English vocabulary. The
result of the tests were analyzed using descriptive statistics. It analyzed the result of
lxxiv teaching and learning process to know the difference before and after the cycle. The
procedure of analyzed using descriptive statistics are as follows: Mean
The data obtained from written and oral test were individual data. Arikunto 1987: 264 explained about how to find the mean of the data. The formula is :
∑ X X = --------
n X
= Mean score ∑ X = Total score
n = Total students
The qualitative data were analyzed by using Constant Comparative Method CCM as suggested by Strauss and Glasser in Moleong 2005: 288-289. CCM was
analyzing the data by comparing one category to another constantly. They said that in general, the data analysis process included data reduction, data classification, data
synthesis, and ended by action hypothesis. The following was a brief of step related to above statement;
1. Data Reduction a Unit identification. First of all, it was identified the smallest unit which was found
in the data. It had to have closed relationship with the research problems. b Having got the unit, the next step was making codification. It meant that we had
to code every unit in order to be known where the data came from. 2. Categorization
a Categorization Arrangement. It meant at choosing every unit which had the same characteristics.
b Every category had to be labeled.
lxxv 3. Synthesis
a To synthesis meant that to look for relationship between one category to another.
b The related one category to another had to be given a label again. 4. Arranging ‘Action Hypothesis’
lxxvi
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION
