Characteristics Sergo
SKJ Elderly
exercise p value
N N
N Sex
Male Female
4 13
23,5 76,5
5 12
29,4 70,6
4 10
28,6 71,4
0,11
Occupation
Worker Non-worker
8 9
47,1 52,9
10 7
58,8 41,2
9 5
64,3 35,7
0,29
Ages
Mean±SD 65,47±5,27
65,18±3,76 65,71±3,83
0,97 Source : Primary data, 2014
The sample characteristics of the three groups based on the gender, the
women sample is bigger than men. The characteristics of the occupation, most of
the control groups do not work, but the intervention group among the elderly who
work and do not work are about the same. The distribution of the age characteristics
between groups is almost the same. The different test results between groups
showed no difference between groups Sergo, SKJ group and the group of the
elderly exercisers with p value 0.05
2. The Univariat Analysis
Table 2.Distribusi Mean Scale Level of Joint Pain In Sergo Group Intervention, SKJ and the Elderly exercise Control group
Groups Pain scale
Mean± SD 95CI
Min Maks
Sergo
Pretest Posttest
3,76±3,65 1,06±1,25
3,20, 4,36 0,42, 1,70
2,00 0,00
6,00 4,00
SKJ
Pretest Posttest
4,53±1,18 3,88±1,41
3,92, 5,14 3,16, 4,61
3,00 1,00
7,00 6,00
Elderly Exercise
Pretest Posttest
4,57±1,22 3,71±1,38
3,87, 5,28 2,92, 4,51
3,00 1,00
7,00 5,00
Source : Primary data, 2014 The intervention and control groups
are equally seen a decrease in the pain scale, but in the intervention group, the
elderly pain
scale decreases
more significantly.
Table 3. The Pull Muscle Strength Mean Distribution on Sergo Group Intervention, SKJ and Elderly Exercise Control group
Groups Pull Muscle Strength
Mean± SD 95CI
Min Maks
Sergo
Pretest Posttest
8,06±3,65 9,15±3,66
6,18, 9,93 7,27, 11,03
3,50 3,50
16,50 16,50
SKJ
Pretest Posttest
5,91±2,59 6,12±3,11
4,58, 7,24 4,52, 7,72
2,00 2,00
10,50 13,50
Elderly exercise
Pretest Posttest
5,75±2,58 5,54±2,93
4,26, 7,24 3,84, 7,23
2,00 2,00
10,50 13,50
Source : Primary data, 2014 The results of the analysis related to
the average muscle strength indicates the strength of the pull of the muscle in the
control group have a mean, minimum and maximum values which are almost,
whereas in the group average Sergo pull muscle strength is 8-9. In the group of
Sergo and SKJ, it is seen an increase but in the elderly exercise no increasing of the
pull muscle strength.
Table 4. Muscle Strength Push Mean Distribution At Sergo Group Intervention, SKJ and Elderly Exercise Control group
Kelompok The Strength of the Muscle Push
Mean± SD 95CI
Min Maks
Sergo
Pretest Posttest
10,68±3,86 12,00±3,65
8,69, 12,66 10,12, 13,88
4,50 5,00
21,00 20,00
SKJ
Pretest Posttest
7,24±2,76 7,11±2,65
5,82, 8,66 5,76, 8,48
2,00 2,00
11,50 11,50
Elderly exercise
Pretest Posttest
7,04±2,58 6,61±2,50
4,26, 7,24 5,17, 8,05
2,00 2,00
10,50 10,50
Source : Primary data, 2014 The results of the analysis related to
the mean of the push muscle strength showed an push in muscle strength in the
control group had a mean, minimum and maximum values which are almost the
same, whereas in the mean of the Sergo group, the push muscle strength is 10-12.
In all three groups is seen an increase in push muscle strength.
3. Bivariat Analysis
