3D SPATIAL INDICES isprsarchives XXXIX B6 173 2012

The integration of the geometrical ALS and radiometrical VHRS information made it possible to achieve high classification accuracy 0.86, Figure 2 and generate segments of vegetation with a similar: height and spectral response. The OBIA processing was performed in eCognition Developer 8.7 Trimble Geospatial and created rule-set was very universal and not dependant on any samples. The details of the classification were a subject of different paper Tompalski and Wężyk, 2011. The result of the OBIA processing, stored as a vector layer Shapefile containing: buildings, low and high vegetation polygons, was subsequently used for batch processing of the ALS point cloud inside each segment. The process was facilitated and automated with the use of LAStools LAStools, 2011 and FUSION USDA Forest Service software McGaughey, 2010. Finally, a script written in R software statistical package was applied to convert ALS point clouds into voxels 3D matrix and to calculate all the attributes needed for computing 3D spatial indices. The volume of each building was calculated as the multiplication of building footprint area and its height. The volume of each homogenous high vegetation class segment was determined using voxels. Figure 2. OBIA classification result – vector layer representing land cover classes as a base for calculating the spatial indices. It has to be pointed out, that the above presented method of extracting building, high and low vegetation areas, is probably one of many possibilities of achieving the result. The essential subject of presented paper is not the method of classifying mentioned land cover classes, nor the accuracy of determining the volume of elevated vegetation, but the spatial indices that rely on them. The input vector data can originate from any GIS source, however it has to have the crucial attributes – cubic volume of the high vegetation areas and buildings.

3. 3D SPATIAL INDICES

The general idea of the 3D spatial indices is to present diversity of different city regions concerning the relation between vegetation and buildings. Two main 3D spatial indices are proposed: 1. Vegetation Volume to Built-up Volume VV2BV, and 2. Urban Vegetation Index UVI. The VV2BV is a ratio of the vegetation cubic volume to the built-up volume and takes into account only the high vegetation class. It can be described with the formula: 1 where V HV is the total cubic volume of high vegetation and V B is the total cubature of built-up class. This index can be also calculated as the percentage of high vegetation in the total volume of built-up and high vegetation. In this case the formula is slightly modified: 2 The UVI index characterizes not only the high vegetation class and built-up cubature, but also the area of low vegetation. It is calculated as a weighted sum of two ratios: high vegetation volume V HV to built-up V B volume ratio and vegetation area to built-up area ratio. The relative area of height vegetation and buildings is used as the weight w, Formula 4: 3 4 where A V is the total area of all vegetated surfaces low and high vegetation, A HV is the total area of high vegetation only and A B is the total area of built-up. As in the case of previous index, UVI can be as well calculated in relative values: 5 The use of relative area of elevated surface high vegetation and buildings is used to split the formula into two parts. The first part is in fact the VV2BV index Formula 1 and is calculated to express the relation between volume of high vegetation and buildings. The second part is meant to reflect the ratio between the areas that are covered by all vegetation classes low and high to the area of buildings. The proposed 3D spatial indices, in both cases have two types, depending on the object they are calculated for. The first type VV2BV CELL or UVI CELL is calculated for each grid cell of the study area. The user can specify the cell size e.g. 100 ×100m, 1km ×1km. In the second type of the index VV2BV BUILDING or UVI BUILDING calculated value is assigned to each building polygon and is based on the GIS spatial analysis performed within a certain distance buffer area around each building e.g. 100m, 1km. XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August – 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia 174 Figure 3. 3D spatial indices calculated for the test area. Top images: VV2BV and UVI indices calculated for 100x100m cell grid, all test area is presented. Bottom images: VV2BV and UVI indices calculated for each building with buffer zone of 100m. Only a subset of sample area is presented to preserve the details. In total, each of the two presented indices has four variants, depending on the object they are calculated for cellbuilding and whether they have an absolute or relative value. The method used to calculate each index can be explained on an example for single cell of 100 ×100m, where buildings, low and high vegetation cover given area. The simplest example worth considering is when all classes cover 13 of the cell area, and buildings and trees have both the same cubic volume. In this case the indices would have values equal to: UVI CELLabs =1.33, VV2BV CELLabs =1, UVI CELL =55.56, VV2BV CELL =50. Together with the increase of the building area or volume, the indices values would decrease. Since the volume is taken into consideration, similar index value can be achieved for a cell with many small buildings or with single high building.

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION