The Fundamental Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility

13

5. Fairness

Companies should always consider the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders based on the principles of fairness and equality. The implementation of CSR is one of the principles of good corporate governance so companies that implement GCG should perform CSR program. The CSR implementation is in accordance with The General Guidance of Good Corporate Governance Indonesia 2006, the company must adhere to the regulations and implement CSR to the society as well as to the environment so it can maintain the sustainability of the business in the long term and to be recognized as a good corporate citizen.

2.3 The Fundamental Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility

Globalization has transformed the various situations in the world market. Local industries are encouraged to increase their competitiveness in order to enter into the global market. One of the challenges of this competition is how companies implement GCG, which in the implementation of GCG must also care for and responsible for the social and environmental interests Untung, 2014. CSR is a form of social responsibility as a companys commitment to ensure sustainable benefits for the company as well as an important basis for businesses to build trust and beliefs for stakeholders. 14

2.3.1 Corporate Social Responsibility

Hopkins 2003 describes CSR as the activity concerned with treating the stakeholders of the firm ethically of in a responsible manner. “Ethically or responsible” means treating stakeholders in a manner deemed acceptable in civilized societies. Social includes economic responsibility. Stakeholders exist both within a firm and outside. The wider aim of social responsibility is to create higher and higher standards of living, while preserving the profitability of the corporation, for peoples both within and outside the corporation. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development 2000 has also explained CSR as the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large. In Indonesia, Undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas No.40 2007 has a quite similar description of CSR. CSR is the commitment of the company to participate in the sustainable economic development to improve the quality of life and environmental benefits the company itself, the local community and society in general. Thus, it can be concluded that CSR is a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis. CSR is also 15 companies obligation in obeying government regulations and taking actions the legal obligations and business aims. The responsibilities cover wider areas that can be summed up as the tripple bottom line approach: i.e. economic, social and environmental.

2.3.2 Three Types of Responsibility

According to the Post 2002, simultaneously the company will carry out three types of responsibilities to stakeholders where all three types of these responsibilities should be executed in a balanced manner. The three types of these responsibilities include: economic responsibility, legal responsibility and social responsibility. Figure 1 Three Types of Firm Responsibility Source: Post 2002 Economic Responsibilities Legal Responsibilities Social Responsibilities 16

2.3.2.1 Economic Responsibilities

The company was established with the objective to generate optimal profits. The managers of the company have such economic responsibility to the shareholders in the aspect of profit management. Proportion of the profits will be distributed to shareholders in dividends and other profits are retained earnings that will increase the value of a company. The company also has economic responsibilities to the creditors that have provided loans to the company. Manager has responsibility in the form of setting aside some of the companys cash to pay the mortgage and loan interest in the due date. The companys failure to meet the economic responsibility to the creditors will greatly affect the companys credit history, resulting a decrease in the companys stock price. 2.3.2.2 Legal Responsibilities Laws and rules are made in order to balance between companies objective with the expectations of society. Therefore, the company must adhere to many regulations as a form of corporate responsibility. The purpose of law enforcement and regulation is that companies are not disadvantaged by other rival companies.

2.3.2.3 Social Responsibilities

Kotler and Lee 2005 describes the corporate social responsibility as a commitment to improve community well being through discretionary business 17 practices and contribution of corporate resources. Kotler and Lee emphasizing the word discretionary which means CSR activities are voluntary responsibility to improve the welfare of the community and is not a business activity that required by law and legislation such as the obligation to pay taxes or adherence to labor laws.

2.3.3 Two Views of Corporate Social Responsibility

There are two contrasting perspectives on the potential relation between CSR and financial performance. Those are:

2.3.3.1 The Classical View

The classica l view elaborates that management’s only responsibility is to maximize profits. Milton Friedman 1962 argues that managers’ primary responsibility is to operate the business in the best interests of the stockholders which is the owner of the corporation. Friedman emphasizes that stockholders have a single concern, financial return. Deciding to spend the organization’s resources for “social good” will only adding to the costs of doing business. Friedman thinks that organizations should be socially responsible but the extent of that responsibility is to maximize organizational profits for stockholders.

2.3.3.2 The Socioeconomic View

The socioeconomic view believe that management’s responsibility goes beyond making profits, but also include protecting and improving society’s welfare Robbin, 2006. This position is based on the belief that corporations are 18 not independent entities responsible only to stockholders. Corporations aso have a responsibility to the larger society that endorses their creation through various laws and regulations and supports them by purchasing the products and services. Thus, the socioeconomic view believe that business organizations are not just merely eonomic institutions. Corporatons should involves in social, political and legal issues.

2.4 The Triple Bottom Line of Corporate Social Responsibility

Dokumen yang terkait

THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (Empirical Study of the Companies that always Listed on SRI KEHATI Index during the Period 2010-2014).

0 3 15

THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (Empirical Study of the Companies that always Listed on SRI KEHA

0 3 18

INTRODUCTION THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (Empirical Study of the Companies that always Listed on SRI KEHATI Index during the Period 2010-2014).

0 2 9

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (Empirical Study of the Companies that always Listed on SRI KEHATI Index during the Period 2010-2014).

0 3 16

CONCLUSION THE INFLUENCE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (Empirical Study of the Companies that always Listed on SRI KEHATI Index during the Period 2010-2014).

0 2 30

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND, PREVIOUS RESEARCH, AND THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE TO EARNINGS FORECAST ACCURACY.

0 3 23

THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCKRETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCK RETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES (Empirical study of the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia St

0 3 15

INTRODUCTION THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCK RETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES (Empirical study of the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2008-2009).

0 3 7

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND HYPOTHESIS THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCK RETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES (Empirical study of the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2008-2009).

0 3 23

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION THE EFFECT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCK RETURN ON INDONESIAN LISTED COMPANIES (Empirical study of the Manufacturing Companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange During the Period 2008-2009).

0 6 23