Reflecting of Cycle 1 Cycle 1 1. Identifying the problem

commit to user 70

5. Reflecting of Cycle 1

The researcher IA and the sixth class teacher W saw several positive results and weaknesses in the first cycle. For the observation, experiential learning could focus the students’ attention and concentration in learning English. The researcher found the students’ progress in learning vocabulary. Some students had enough courage to give response and opinion about the task. Based on the students’ diary, some students told that their English is improving when they learn using experiential learning. Teaching vocabulary using experiential learning also increased their motivation in joining the lesson. They were enthusiastic in doing some activities, especially applying the vocabulary in real conversation with their friends. The students seemed happy when they were directly involved in learning process using experiential learning. They could pronounce and spell the words better. They got new words which were in correct grammar. They could give the meaning each word and sentence. However, there were some students who were still passive during the implementation of the actions, not all of the students were active. There were some students who still kept quiet and did not give their response or opinion. There were some students who could not memorize the meaning. The result of the test shows that the mean score of pre-test is 56.79 and the mean score of post-test is 67.29. It can be concluded that commit to user 71 there is a better progress than pre-test. The result of the vocabulary showed that there was improvement from pre-test to post-test. Even though in general the researcher found the students’ improvement in vocabulary, some students still had difficulty in memorizing the vocabulary. When the teacher gave some questions, there were some students who did not raise their hands and did not try to answer the questions. When the teacher asked them to work in groups, they did not participate to finish the tasks. They only chatted and even disturbed their friends. Besides problems dealing with the vocabulary mastery, the class situation needs to be improved. Not all students were active. Some classroom activities did not run well. Some students did not take part actively in teaching learning process. They were busy with their own activities. From the research reflections of the observation above it can be concluded that cycle 1 is not satisfactory. To gain the better progress goal and better product, it was necessary to conduct learning action in the second cycle. In cycle 1, the difficulties faced by the students are: some of the students still had difficulties in memorizing the vocabulary. The other problems were the students were still incorrect in writing down the words and they still had difficulties in pronouncing and spelling. To solve the problem of class situation, first, the writer replaced the method of experiential learning in the form of game to attract their commit to user 72 attention and to motivate them to join the teaching and learning process. Second, the writer did not force them to be always correct in answering her questions but she gave them more chances to think and to do the activities in teaching and learning process. Third, the teacher would reduce the students’ noise by making them more active in learning process. She would give the students rewards such as praise. Finally, managing the time to be adjusted with the time allotment. The result of Cycle 1 can be seen in the table below: Table 4.1 The Summary Result of the Research Cycle 1 Class condition based on the result data from ObservationInterview Before Research Cycle 1 After Research Cycle 1 1. Difficulty in grasping and memorizing the meaning of the words. 2. Difficulty in writing down the words correctly. 3. Difficulty in pronouncing the words 4. Difficulty in using vocabulary in a sentence 5. Feel shy and afraid to ask the teacher. 6. Lack of self confidence 7. Little vocabulary 8. Not innovative teacher 1. There were some who still forgot vocabulary. 2. There were some who were still incorrect in writing down words. 3. There were some who still mispronounced the words 4. There were some still misused the structure of the sentences 5. There were some who were still shy, afraid. 6. There were some who still felt doubt. 7. There were some who still having little vocabulary 8. Innovative teacher commit to user 73 Students’ vocabulary Mastery Based on the observation Before Research cycle 1 After Research Cycle 1 1. Pronunciation : low 2. Spelling : low 3. Words usage : low 4. Meaning : low 1. Pronunciation : fair 2. Spelling : fair 3. Words usage : fair 4. Meaning : fair Students’ vocabulary Mastery Based on the pre-test Pre-test Post-test Mean : 56.79 Mean: 67.29

6. Revising the Plan

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving Students’ English Vocabulary Through Cluster Technique ( A Classroom Action Research At The Second Grade Of Smp Al-Kautsar Bkui Jakarta)

2 9 62

IMPROVING STUDENTS' VOCABULARY MASTERY BY USING WORD WEBS (A Classroom Action Research on the Third Grade of SDN Sidorejo Lor 1 Salatiga in the 2009 2010 Academic Year)

0 4 94

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Grade of SD Negeri Kalimacan in Academic Year 2009 2010)

6 23 84

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH BOARD GAMES (A Classroom Action Research at the Fourth Grade of SDN Cengklik II Surakarta in 2009 2010 Academic Year)

0 11 81

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY USING OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT SIXTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI 2 SURU GEYER GROBOGAN IN 2009 / 2010 ACADEMIC YEAR).

1 7 7

IMPROVING VOCABULARY MASTERY BY USING SONGS ( A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IN THE SEVENTH YEAR OF SMPN 1 IMPROVING VOCABULARY MASTERY BY USING SONGS ( A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IN THE SEVENTH YEAR OF SMPN 1 SIDOHARJO SRAGEN IN THE 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YE

0 1 8

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY BY USING CARTOON FILMS (A Classroom Action Research on the Fourth Grade of SDN 01 Mojosongo in 2009 / 2010 Academic Year).

0 0 14

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY USING FLASHCARD (A Classroom Action Research on Fifth Grade Students of SD N Mojosari in 2009/2010 Academic Year).

0 0 14

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BRAINSTORMING ACTIVITIES IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH ON THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 39 PURWOREJO IN 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 0 17

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH SONGS A Classroom Action Research in The Third Grade Students of SD Negeri Tangkil 1 in the Academic Year 20102011

0 1 96