Introduction Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology:Vol242.Issue2.Oct1999:

212 J .P. Manderson et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 242 1999 211 –231 refuge for winter flounder from searobin predation during some years.  1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords : Predator–prey; Prey choice; Size selection; Trigilid; Flatfish predator

1. Introduction

Predation risk is a critical factor determining the suitability of nursery habitats, including those used by commercially important flatfish Gibson, 1994. Following settlement, flatfish face a suite of invertebrate, fish and bird predators that typically narrows in composition as the prey grow. While newly settled flatfish suffer high mortality from crustacean predators Pihl and van der Veer, 1992; Seikai et al., 1993; Witting and Able, 1995, later stage juveniles are primarily preyed upon by piscivorous fishes Ansell and Gibson, 1993; Ellis and Gibson, 1995, 1997; Gibson and Robb, 1996; Bax, 1998. Variations in the identity and capability of piscivorous fish in flatfish nurseries, along with changes in the relative size of predators and prey, are likely to result in important temporal and spatial variations in predation intensity. While relationships between predatory fish and European flatfish have been studied Gibson and Robb, 1996; Bax, 1998, there have been no systematic studies of the potential impacts of piscivorous fish in northwest Atlantic flatfish nurseries. The striped sea robin Prionotus evolans is common on soft-bottom continental shelf and estuarine habitats in the Mid-Atlantic Bight and co-occurs with a number of flatfish including the commercially important winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus McBride and Able, 1994; Rountree and Able, 1997; McBride et al., 1998. Although young-of-the-year YOY winter flounder and other flatfishes have been reported in the searobin’s diet Marshall, 1946; Richards et al., 1979, the interaction between the two species has not been studied. Small flatfish are known dietary components for a number of other triglid species searobins and gurnards Richards et al., 1979; Meyer and Smale, 1991; Ellis and Gibson, 1995. Triglids are opportunistic predators that use modified anterior pectoral fin rays equipped with tactile and chemosensory receptors to search soft substrata for epibenthic prey, particularly crustaceans Bardach and Case, 1965; Silver and Finger, 1984; Ross, 1977. The ability of triglids to use finrays to search for and flush prey could make them particularly effective predators of juvenile flatfishes, which use soft sediment as refuge and burial as an escape response Gibson and Robb, 1992; Minami et al., 1994. In this study we report on the dietary patterns of striped searobins collected in shallow-water habitats in a mid-Atlantic estuarine system. We also present results of laboratory experiments testing the following null hypotheses: • 1 H : Prey size selectivity of striped searobins for juvenile winter flounder prey is similar in the presence and absence of fine sand subtratum. • 2 H : Searobins consume equivalent numbers of winter flounder and sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa during both daytime and nighttime experiments. J .P. Manderson et al. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 242 1999 211 –231 213 • 3 H : The proportions of winter flounder and sand shrimp consumed by searobins are not different from the proportions of the two prey at the start of experiments. Finally, we report on video observations of the search and attack strategies of searobins feeding on juvenile winter flounder.

2. Materials and methods