lxxxiv In reflecting point, it is necessary to expose the data about: 1 the
students’ improvement in writing competence; and 2 the energizing the students in learning process.
1. The Students Improvement in Writing Competence
a. The Results of CAR
1 Content
The students got the average score of content in posttest cycle 2 was 16.17
while in posttest cycle 3 was 16.48. It meant that the increasing was about 0.31. The maximum score of content was 20. It meant that the students’ ability in
content for posttest cycle 2 was 20
17 .
16 x 100 = 80.85 while post test cycle 3
was 20
48 .
16 x 100 = 82.40 So, the increasing was 82.40 – 80.85 =
1.55. It could be concluded that the students, classically, had achieved the ability of content of 82.40. It meant that the POA had given the positive
influence against the students’ improvement in writing..
2 Organization
The students got the average score of organization in post test cycle 2 was 15.48 while in post test cycle 3 was 16.22. It meant that the increasing was about
0.74. The maximum score of organization was 20. It meant that the students’ ability in organization for post test cycle 2 was
20 48
. 15
x 100 = 77.40 while the post test cycle 3 was
20 22
. 16
x 100 = 81.10. So, the increasing was 81.10. - 77.40 = 3.70. It could be concluded that the students, classically,
lxxxv had achieved the ability of organization of 81.10. It meant that the POA had
given the positive influence against the students’ improvement in writing.
3 Vocabulary
The students got the average score of vocabulary in cycle 2 was 13.78
while in post test cycle 3 was 16.00. It meant that the decreasing was 2.22. The maximum score of vocabulary was 20. It meant that the students’ ability in
vocabulary for pos test in cycle 2 was 20
78 .
13 x 100 = 68.9
while the post test in cycle 3 was.
20 16
x 100 = 80 So, the decreasing was 80 - 68.90 =
11.10. It could be concluded that the students, classically, had achieved the ability of vocabulary of 80. It meant that the POA had given the positive
influence against the students’ improvement in writing.
4 Language
The students got the average score of language in post test cycle 2 was
18.61 while the score in post test cycle 3 was 22.30. It meant that the increasing was about 3.69. The maximum score of language was 30. It meant that the
students’ ability in language for post test cycle 2 was 30
61 .
18 x 100 = 62.03
while the post test in cycle 3 was 30
30 .
22 x 100 = 74.33. So, the increasing
was 74.33 - 62.03 = 12.30. The students classically had to increase the ability of language of 74.33. It could be concluded that the students, classically,
had achieved the ability of language of 81.10. It meant that the POA had given the positive influence against the students’ improvement in writing.
lxxxvi
5 Mechanics
The students got the average score of mechanics in post test cycle 2 was
7.74 while the score in pot test cycle 3 was 7.83. It meant that the increasing was about 0.09. The maximum score of mechanics was 10. It meant that the students’
ability in mechanics for post test cycle 2 was 10
74 .
7 x 100 = 77.40 while the
post test cycle 3 was. 10
83 .
7 x 100 = 78.30. So, the increasing was 78.30.-
77.40 = 0.9. The students classically had to increase the ability of mechanics of 21.70. It could be concluded that the students, classically, had achieved the
ability of mechanics of 78.30. It meant that the POA had given the positive influence against the students’ improvement in writing.
b. The Problems of CAR
