THE EFFECT OF USING DEMONSTRATION TECIIIIIQUE ON THE GRADE SEVEN STUDENTS' PROCEDURE TEXT WRITING ACHIE\TMENT AT SMPN 2 TAFIGGTJL IN TIIE 2OIOI2OII ACADEMIC YEAR

THE EFFECT OF USING DEMONSTRATION TECIIIIIQUE ON THE GRADE
SEVEN STUDENTS' PROCEDURE TEXT WRITING ACHIE\TMENT
AT SMPN 2 TAFIGGTJL IN TIIE 2OIOI2OII ACADEMIC YEAR

THESIS

By:
SELIA MARIA ULFA
06021049t73r

ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
T.ACULTY OF TEACHER TRAIi\TING AI\D EDUCATTON
JEMBER I]NTVERSITY

20rl

DEDICATION

This thesis is honorably dedicated to:
mother Sugiyarti, S'Pd and
My beloved father Sodik Purnomo, B.A , my beloved

my dearest soulmate Ari Hijrah, S'T

CONSI]LTA}ITS' APPROVAL

TI{R EFFECT OF USING DEMONSTRATION TECIIMQUE ON THE GRADE
SEVEN STUDENTS' PROCEDT]RE TEXT WRITING ACIIIEVEMENT
AT SMP NEGERI2 TANGGUL IN 2OTO/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR

THF'SIS

Ulfa

Name

" Selia Maria

Place/ Date of Birth

; Jember, November 5th 1987

NIM

060210491

13

Program

:

Deparhent

: Language and

Faculty

: Teacher

I

English EducationStudy Program

Arts Education

Training and Education

Approved by

..ll,rtit

('i.irt:,:t

I

ur,

..- il
:--:,"1::il'lttig

'' I laill

lrrtli.irill\,,.

"
\f

!.]St.)ii,]r

tl{it

I

-'
,t
E,[

\

Drs. SugengAriyanto, M. A
NrP 19590472 198702 | 001

APPROVAL OF THE EXAMINATION COMMITTEE
This Thesis is Approved and Received by the Examination Committee of the Faculty
of Teacher Training and Education, Jember University on:

Date

: Tuesday, June

Place

: The Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jember University.

14tr,201I

The Committee
-l'he

The Chairperson,

. ...

.,,. :.:'a

.:"

-,'.

.:.._:,,:,,'''

,Scclctar v.

;
{

,.

:,4

Dra. Wiwiek Istianah, M.Kes, M.Ed

NIP. 19501017 198503 2001

Drs. Sugeng Ariyanto, M.A
NIP.

The Mernbers;

l. Drs.I Putu Sukmaantara, M.Ed
NrP 19640424199002 1 003

2. Drs. Bambang Suharjito, M.Ed
NIP 19611023 198902

I

c'L-f

001

The Dean,

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Drs. H. Imam Muchtar. S.H. M.Hum
NIP. 19540712 198003 I 005

SUIVIMARY

The Effect of Using Demonstration Technique on the Grade Seven Students'
Procedure Text Writing Achievement at SMP Negeri 2 Tanggul in the 2A10/
2011 Academic Year; selia Maria

ura,

060210491131, 2011: 46 pages; English

Education Study Progtam of the Language and Arts Education, the Faculty of
Teacher Training and Education, Jember Universify'

The development of language learning especially English is greatly
'supported by the use of ieveral kinds of interesting teaching techniques. One of

rhe teaching techniques that can be implemented in teaching writing is
,iemonstation technique. Concerning writing as one of the English skills that
:hould be mastered by the students in Junior High School, many of thr students
mrght experience difficulties. It could be solved with an innovative way of.
reachintr, such as using the demonstration technique

in teaching writing. In this

re-arcb, the demonstration technique is applied to create comfortable atmosphere
t.:r the students and the teacher in the writing claSs. Further, the teacher can
:.-.nduct the writing class as an interactive lesson
=..tir-ated

in which the

students are

during the.teaching and learning process,

Thtq research \vas conducted

to

investigate

the Effect of using

Demonstration Technique on the Grade Seven Students' Procedure Text Writing
-\chier-ement at SNIP Negeri 2 Tanggul in the 2010/

20li Academic

Year. The

of this research were the grade seven students at SMP Negeri 2
Tang-rul 1n the 20t0i 2011 academic year. The research respondents were

respondents

Jetermined by cluster randorn sampling through a lottery. The total number of the

i.-:trrndenrs was 82 students; 41 students of class

VII A

-:.:: teueht rvnting by dentonstration techni{ue and

4l

as the experimental group

strrdcnts oIclass

VII C as

.i-: Jtrttrtrl group that taught by lecturing techniqtre. The data of this research
.,,
:i:' ;olle ctecl fiom the students' scores of ivriting test. interview and the

documentation. The result

of the. post test was

used to compare the mean

difference between the experimental group and the control grotp after the
teaching treatrnent. It was computed using lndependent Sample T-Test on SPSS
(Statistical Package of Science). Based on the calculation, the mean score of the
experimental group was higher than the mean score of the control group (64.22
57.37). The value

of significant is 0.000 and this value is lorver than 0.05. This

means that the null hypothesis (H") formulated: "there is no significant effect

of

using demonstration technique on the grade seven sfudents' procedure text writing
achievement at SMP Negeri

2 Tanggul in the 2010/ 2011 academic year' was

rejected. Thus, the alternative hypothesis stated "there is signifrcant effect of using

demonstration technique on the gradel seven. students' procedure text writing
achievement at SMP,Negeri

2 Tanggul in the

20101 2011 academic year" was

accepted.

The research results proved that thpre was significanl effect o{ using
d.emonstfation technique on the grade seven,studgnts' procedure tg.xt writtng
achievement
Therefore,

at SIrlI| Negeri 2 Tanggul in th9 2}rcl 20ll

it is recommended to.the English

academic year'

teacher to apply the demonstration

tchnique in teaching writing of the procedure text.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all,

I would like to thank Allah swr,

the Almighty, who always

leads and provides blessing, mercy, and guidance to me, so
thesis.

I am sure without His mercies,

the arrangement

I can accomplish

this

a good health and great opportunity during

of this thesis, it will be very difficult for me to reach the goal.

Dealing with the writing and finishing of this thesis, I am willing to convey
my sincere thanks to:
I

. The

Dean of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jember University

2. The Chairperson of the Language and Arts Education of the Teacher Training
and Education, Jember University.

3. The chailperson of the English Education Study program of The Faculty of
Teacher Training and Educafion, Jember University.

4. Drs. Bambang Suhafito, M.Ed as my first consultant and Drs. Sugeng
Ariyanto, M. A as the second consuliant who have given me valuable guidance
in the process of finishing this thesis.

5. The Examination committee, Dra. wiwiek Istianall M.Kes,
chairperson of the exarnination comrnittee and Drs.

I Putu

M.Ed

as the

Sukmaantara as the

examlner.

' All lecturers of the English Education Study Program and staff of the Faculty
of Teacher Training and Education, Jember University.

The Principal of SMP Negeri 2 Tanggul who gave me an opporfunity and
permission in conducting the research.

8, The English teacher of SMP Negeri 2 Tanggul who has helped me during the
research.

9. AII my friends who are being part of my life
Finally, I feel really grateful to all of them who offered positive comments
and criticism for the improvement of this thesis.
Jember, May 2011
The wnter

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

TITLE

I

DEDICATION

ii

CONSULTANTS' APPROVAL

IU

APPROVAL OF' THE EXAMINATION COMMITTTE
SUMMARY

lv

ACIS{OWLEDGEMENT

vlt

TABLE OF CONTENTS

vru

THE LIST OF'TABLES.

xll

TITE LIST OFAPPEI\DIX

xlll

CIIAPTER

1.

v

INTRODUCTION

1,1 The Background of the Research

I

l.2The Problem of the

J

1.3 The Research

Research.

Limitation

5

1.4 Objective of the Research..

4

1.5 The Significance of the Research

4

1.5.1

The English Teacher.....

4

1.5.2 The Srudents
1.5.3 The Other Researcher

4
4

1.6 Operational Definitions of the Terrns
1.

6.

1

1.6.2

5

Demonstration Technique-...............

5

Procedure Text..,......,

5

1.6.3 Writrng

Achievement

..........;.......

6

CHAPTER 2. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
1
8

8
8

2. 1.4 Coherence

8

2.1 .4.1 Coherence

from Transition Signals

9

2.1.4.2 Coherence from Logibai
Order

l0

2.2WntngAchievement.........., .
.,
2.2.1 Vocabulary

l0
1l

2.2.2 Grcrnmat

t2

2.2.3 Orgatnzatton

l3

2.3 Tlpes of Text

t4

2.3.1 Proceduretext.

2.4T\e
2.4.

14

General Knowledge of Demonshation
Technique

I T\e

l5

Guidelines for Effective Demonstlation

t6

2.4.2 T}le procedures of Demonstration
Teaching Technique ...
2.4.3 The Advantages of Demonstration
Technique...... ............
2. 4. 4 The Weaknesses
of Demonstration Technique .

18

20
22

2.5 The Effects of Demonstration
Technique in Writing
2. 6 Alternative Hypothesis............

22
23

CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Design
3.2 Area Determination Method.
3.3 RespondentDeterminationMethod
3.4Data Collection Method
3.4.1 Test
3.4.2 Interview......,......
3.4.3 Documentation
3.5 Data Analysis Method......
3.1 Research

CHAPTER 4. RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
4.1 The Schedule of the Research

4.2The Results of Collectrng Data
4.2.1 The Result of Inteniew
4.2.2 The Result of Documentahon
..........,
4.3 The Result of Homogeneity
Test.........
4.4 The Description of Treatments

.

24

26
26
27
27
30
30
30

32

5t
JZ
33
34
35

37
4.7 Tbe Hypothesis Verification
4.8 Discussion ....._...

38

, j'."'l;":.:":"

.

CIIAPTER 5. COtrICLUSION AND
SI,GGESTION

39

40

45
5.2.

I

45
The English, Teacher

5.2.2T\e Students

45

46
46

THE LIST OF TABLE
1.1. i,

-

Page

l0

2.1 Transitions Groups
g.

t T'he Scoiing'

Guide............-.........'......

28

-. -

4.1 The Schbduli of;artministering the iebearch '....','.'...-:-::ii:'-.......-"...'

12

4.ZTheTotal number of the grade seven students of SMP Negeri 2
,34,

Tanggul lmI}ie2OIO/2011 acadtmio ysar.....:'..;.'.'.'';....:..-i.,"'r.;.'.!:i.

'

4.3 The Sehedule of administering the teaFnenti-..r:'j''j-'...i--'.-.'--..'.i.:'.r:r
4.

4 The Output of Independent, Saqple T-T'esJ of writing'sGor€

i-

-.', ;.

;-

i'

,

35:
3{l

-

TIIE LIST OF APPDNDICES
Page

ResearchMatrix.......
B. Scoring Guide
C. The guideline of instnrments
D. Lesson Plan 1........
E. Lesson Plan 2.
F- Homogeneity test........
G. Post Test......,,...
H. The score of homogeneity test.'.....-.....
I. The output of one-way ANOVA'...
J. The list of the respondents' name

48

A.

49
50

..

5l
56

6l
64
65

66
67

K. The score of post test

K.la

The post test score of experimental

goup

K.1b The post test score of control group

68
70

L. The score of post test for each indicators
L.1.a The scores of each indicator of the experimental goup

72

L.1.b The scores of each indicator of the control group -'..."'

73

M.The example of the way of scoring

M.la The example of the way of scoring for experimental group "'
M.lb The example of the way of scoring for contol group
N. The result of observation checklist of the try out
O. Letter of Research Permit from

FKIP

P. Letter of Research Permit from SMP Negeri 2 Tanggul-'

74
87
100
101

t02