Notion of child rights

c. The Child Rights to a Healthy Social Environment

They want to be valued and accepted. They want to be safe. They want to learn and explore, they want to play and have fun, they need to find meaning in their lives and make a spiritual connection Garbarino, 2008: 17. When the social environment spreads “fear and falsehood,” it becomes poisonous to the development of children and youth, much as when the physical environment is poisoned and misused it can undermine their physical well-being. There are two toxic that can be the reason of it’s that the two toxic forces have blocked ratification. The first is the fundamentalist impulse in American culture that fears and rejects human rights initiatives in general as a threat to the power of the entrenched interests of homophobic, patriarchal, punishment-oriented “traditional values.” The second is the power of those who believe that we are above and beyond the rest of the world – “We’re Number One” –and therefore entitled to our exceptional status. Americans have a special difficulty in dealing with this issue. One of our problems is what historians have called our “historical exceptionalism.” What they mean in using this term is that we tend to view our history as unique, and to reject the idea that we are like everyone else, as a people and as a country Garbarino, 2008: 248

d. Participation and the Evolving Capacities of a Child

Adults respect and consider the expressions and opinions of children, this does not equate to granting them every wish or request. Rather, parents as well as other adults are encouraged to consider the relevance of the topic, maturity level, and if the matter under consideration is in the “best interest of the child” Hart in Garbarino, 2008: 184. He also states that all children the right to expression, thought and religion, association and assembly, and play. Because a child’s right to participation depends on social environments providing equal opportunities for participation Hart in Garbarino, 2008: 184. According to Garbarino 2008: 184 Children are anchored to the relationships, experiences, and opportunities vital to exerting their right to participation, the more likely they are to thrive and be protected from risk. Thus, in accord with the theme of this text, child participation depends in large part on being raised in a socially healthy environment.

e. Social Anchoring

Social anchoring refers to grounding children in healthy families, other adult relationships, and communities Garbarino, 2008: 185. Participation begins at birth when newborns and infants participate in reciprocal interactions in which their behavior appears to be indiscriminate but meaningful Flekkoy and Kaufman in Garbarino, 2008: 185. For example, although they lack verbal ability, all infants, regardless of culture, communicate by engaging in survival behaviors meant to obtain responses from caregivers. The function of these interactions generally will lead to an attachment relationship which will predict healthy or unhealthy human development consequently empowering them with the evolving capacities necessary for exerting their right to participation Ainsworth and Collins in Garbarino, 2008: 185.

2. Discussion

The author criticizes some aspects in the story such as social aspects, economic aspects, political aspects, cultural aspect, religious aspect, science and technology aspect. In the social aspects contain social structure. Picoult shows that most of the characters work as a lawyer, judge, professionals finance and

Dokumen yang terkait

Anna’s Sacrifrices In Jodi Picoult’s Nover My Sister’s Keeper

1 134 49

Anna’s Personality Through Sigmund’s Freud Theory In Jodi Picoult’s My Sister’s Keeper

3 65 77

CHILD Child Right For The Physical Body In Jodi Picoult’s Novel My Sister’s Keeper (2004): A Sociological Approach.

0 1 12

CHILD RIGHT FOR THE PHYSICAL BODY IN JODI PICOULT’S NOVEL MY SISTER’S KEEPER (2004): Child Right For The Physical Body In Jodi Picoult’s Novel My Sister’s Keeper (2004): A Sociological Approach.

0 1 12

ANNA FITZGERALD’S EXISTENCE REFLECTED AT JODI PICOULT’S MY SISTER’S KEEPER (2004): AN Anna Fitzgerald’s Existence Reflected At Jodi Picoult’s My Sister’s Keeper (2004): An Existentialist Approach.

0 1 14

INTRODUCTION Anna Fitzgerald’s Existence Reflected At Jodi Picoult’s My Sister’s Keeper (2004): An Existentialist Approach.

0 1 13

ANNA FITZGERALD’S EXISTENCE REFLECTED AT JODI PICOULT’S MY SISTER’S KEEPER (2004): Anna Fitzgerald’s Existence Reflected At Jodi Picoult’s My Sister’s Keeper (2004): An Existentialist Approach.

0 1 16

CHILD RIGHTS REFLECTED IN JODI PICOULT’S MY SISTER’S KEEPER: Child Rights Reflected In Jodi Picoult’s My Sister’s Keeper: A Sociological Perspective.

0 1 15

INTRODUCTION Child Rights Reflected In Jodi Picoult’s My Sister’s Keeper: A Sociological Perspective.

0 1 15

PERSONALITY OF ANNA IN JODI PICOULT’S PERSONALITY OF ANNA IN JODI PICOULT’S MY SISTER’S KEEPER: A PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH.

0 0 15