The Significance of the Study

1.2 Suggestions

In connection with the conclusion, some suggested stated as follow: 1. English teachers are recommended to use ASK to THINK TEL-WHY and guided reciprocal questioning strategy in reading comprehension, since both of these strategies can increase students’ reading comprehension achievement. 2. English teachers should identify strong style patterns in their classes and devise lesson plans which accommodate individual learning style preferences. To improve learners reading comprehension, they need to be aware of the beliefs learners hold; cognitive styles. Because by knowing cognitive styles: 1 Learners who are conscious of their style make better use of their learning opportunities. 2 Learners learn better when they are provided with learning opportunities that enhance and extend their learning preferences. 3 Learners work better with new learning styles when they are given guided opportunities to practice them. These principles suggest that learning is enhanced and enriched when cognitive styles are properly addressed both before and during instruction. 3. From the finding of this research, it is proved that reading strategies can improve students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Thus, by determining Students’ cognitive style, teachers can give appropriate treatment to guide students based on their style, and give special attention to the field dependent students, to make them better and can be equally well with field independent students in reading comprehension. 4. Teachers can develop further study in the area of reading strategies that expected to improve students reading comprehension achievement. It is believed that with the advent of learner-centered approaches, future teachers have the responsibility of training students to be capable of deciding what their best learning path is. They should be ready to assist and guide students through the process of reflecting on how they learn best. 5. Teachers should make learners aware of the need of strategic, autonomous learning and should train them in the effective use of those strategies. REFERENCES Ary, D., Jacobs, C. Lucy, Sorensen, C. Razavieh, A. 2010. Introduction to Reasearch and Education. Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Berry, James. 2005. Levels of Reading Comprehension. Retrieved March 7, 2012 from httpwww.sc4. edudocumentsstudyskillsh7levelsreadingcomp.doc. Bransford, J. 1985. Schema Activation and Schema Acquisition. In H. Singer R. B. Ruddell Eds., Theoretical models and processes of reading pp. 385-397. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Cagley, C. 1983. Field-DependenceIndependence as a Predictor of Inferencing and Problem Solving Abilities in Community College Students. Boca Raton: Florida Atlantic University Dissertation. California Task Force. 2002. Reading, Every Child A Reader. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from http:orton-gillingham.comorton-gillingham2.asp-11k. Dutcher, Peggy. 1990. Authentic Reading Assessment. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation. Retrieved March, 6 2012 from http: PAREonline.netgetvn. asp?v=22n=6. Goldstein, K.M, Blackman, S. 1978. Cognitive Styles: Five Approaches and Relevant Research. New York: Wiley Sons. Goodman, K. 1970. Reading as a psychologistic guessing game. In H. Singer and R. B. Ruddell . Eds. Theoretical models and Processes of Reading. Newark, N.J.: International reading Association. Graesser, C. Arthur, 2007. An introduction to Strategic Reading Comprehension. In McNamara, S. Danielle Ed., Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions and Technologies pp. 3-26. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Graesser, A. C., Singer, Wiemer-Hastings, Peter. Wiemer-Hastings, Katja. 2001. Constructing Inferences and Relations during Text Comprehension. In Sanders, Schilperoord, Spooren Eds, Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects pp.1-26. AmsterdamsPhiladelphia: Benjamins. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., Trabasso, T. 1994. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101:371 –395. Jung, C.G. 1923. Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 111