Research Objectives Theoretical Review

C. Problem formulation

According to Guskey 2000, professional development is process and activities designed to enhance the professional knowledge, skills, and attitudes of educators. “Development generally refers to general growth not focused on a specific job” Richards and Farrel 2005: 4 Lesson study basically involves a group of teachers who do the planning, implementation, and post-learning reflection together to form a synergistic learning community. Teachers are working collaboratively. First, they analyze the problem of learning, both from the aspect of teaching materials and teaching methods. Furthermore, the teachers also collaboratively find solutions and design student-centered learning. The next step is to apply the lesson plan in class by a teacher, the others are as observers of student activities, and then it is followed by a discussion after the lesson to reflect on it. This research will specifically address a research question “How do English teachers develop their professionalism through lesson study?”

D. Research Objectives

In order to improve the quality of education the government released Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008 about teachers. Article number 10 states that teachers should have four competences. The four competences include pedagogic, personal, social, and academic competences. As previously stated above that this research will specifically address to a question, ‟How do English teachers develop their professionalism through lesson study?” In relation to the research question, the objective of this research is to describe how English teachers develop the four components of teacher ‟s competences: 1 pedagogic, 2 personal, 3 social, and 4 academic competences through lesson study.

E. Research benefits

This study would describe how English teachers developed the four competences of teacher‟s professionalism through lesson study. They are pedagogic, personal, social, and academic competence. The description is a kind of information for English teachers, schools, government and teachers in all subjects as well as any parties who are concerned with education. Based on the description of this study teachers will acknowledge some aspects of lesson study that are in line with teachers‟ professional development.They will see the effectiveness of the lesson study on examining and improving their lesson preparation and teaching practice. The description and interpretation are also valuable for further research related to the use of lesson study in other lines. In other words, the result of this study will give contribution to the improvement of English language studies in general. 8

CHAPTER II THEORETICAL REVIEW

This chapter attempts to place this study in the context of English teachers‟ professional development through lesson study. It provides basic information about some keywords in this study from some relevant literatures. It consists of three major sections, namely, a theoretical review, b review of related study and c theoretical framework.

A. Theoretical Review

This section will elaborate some keywords that are used in this study. It will lead the subject being studied more closely and accurately. It will give more comprehension to the construct of the object studied. There are four notions to be explored, namely, 1 professional development, 2 professional teacher, 3 lesson study, and 4 action research. 1. Professional Development According to the thesaurus of the Educational Resources Information Center data base ncrel.org, professional development refers to some activities to enhance the professional career growth. Such activities may include individual development, continuing education, and in-service education, as well as curriculum writing, peer collaboration, study groups, and peer coaching or mentoring. There are some overviews given by Guskey, Richard and Farrel, Rodrigues, Glatthorn, and Rasidas and Glassto see more deeply what professional development is. Guskey 2000 defines professional development as process and activities designed to enhance the professional knowledge, skills, and attitudes of educators. He also states that there are three characteristics of professional development. First, professional development is a purposeful and intentional process. It is a consciously design effort to bring about positive change and improvement to the educators. Second, professional development is an ongoing process. The process grows and develops continuously. Third, professional development is a systemic process. It is a deliberate process, guided by a clear vision of purposes and planned goals. These goals formed the criteria by which content and material are selected, processes and procedures developed, and assessments and evaluation prepared. Strategies for teacher development often involve documenting different kinds of teaching practices; reflective analysis of teaching practices, examining beliefs, values, and principles; conversation with peers on core issues; and collaborating with peers on classroom project. Richards and Farrel 2005:4 Professional development is a continuous process of individual and collective examination and improvement of practice. It should empower individual educators and communities of educators to make complex decisions; to identify and solve problems; and to connect theory, practice, and student outcomes. “Mutual sharing of knowledge and experience is a valuable source of teachers‟ professional growth.” Richards and Farrel 2005: 2. Professional development also should enable teachers to offer students the learning opportunities. Professional development should deepen and broaden knowledge of content. It should provide a strong foundation in the pedagogy of particular disciplines and knowledge about the teaching and learning processes. Professional development should be rooted in and reflect the best available research. The content of professional development should be aligned with the standards and curriculum teachers‟ use. Professional development should contribute to measurable improvement in student achievement. Professional development should be intellectually engaging and address the complexity of teaching. Professional development should provide sufficient time, support, and resources to enable teachers to master new content and pedagogy and to integrate this knowledge and skill into their practice. Professional development should be designed by teachers in cooperation with experts in the field. Professional development should take a variety of forms, including some we have not typically considered. Rodrigues 2005 states that according to Tobin, Briscoe, and Holman 1990 that personal reflection, the commitment to personal change and the reconstruction of personal understanding of teaching and learning, and the ultimately classroom practice have a significant role to play in teacher professional development. ”Professional development has no fixed route if it is viewed as lifelong le arning” Rodrigues 2005: 4. Professional development refers to knowledge and skills attained for both personal development and career advancement. Englis h teachers‟ professional development is that teachers enhance and nurture their knowledge of the subject they are teaching and their teaching skills through evaluating or reflecting their teaching experience. “Teacher‟s development is the professional growth a teacher achieves as a result of gaining increased experience and examining his or her teaching systematically” Glatthorn 1995: 41. Teachers‟ professional development is when they are engaged in meaningful activities; when they collaborate with peers, exchange ideas, and provide and receive peer feedback; when they reflect critically on what they are doing; when they work on real-world, challenging, authentic activities; when they work is constantly evaluated; and when they are intrinsically motivated Rasidas and Glass 2004 2. Professional Teachers Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008 about Teachers states that teachers are professional educators. They should have: a an academic qualification, b four competences, c an educator certificate, and d an ability to achieve national education goal. They should be healthy inside and outside. Their main tasks are to educate, to teach, to guide, to train, to assess, and to evaluate the students. To do that a teacher should have a set of knowledge, skill, and attitude that should be actualized in his professional on doing his work article 3. He should posses the academic qualification which is suitable for the subject he is teaching. It is also stated in Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008 about Teacher that teachers should have four competencies which include pedagogy, personality, social, and academic competence and apply the four competences in their real work. a. Teacher ‟s Competence Based on The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 16, 2007 on Teachers Competence and Academic Qualification Standard, teachers are as the agents of education. They should have four main teachers‟ competences, pedagogic, personal, social, and academic competences. The four competences are developed into smaller points of teachers‟ competences. Pedagogic competence is teacher‟s competence on some aspects. The first aspect is teacher‟s understanding on his students. On understanding students a teacher should understand his students physically, morally, spiritually, socially, culturally, emotionally, and intellectually. T eachers are able to identify students‟ potential on the subject being taught and to know the initial input of the students ‟ competence. They have to understand students‟ difficulties on learning the subject. The second is applying various approaches, strategies, methods, and techniques on teaching and learning. The third is developing curriculum. The activities on developing curriculum are deciding learning objectives, developing learning experienceactivities, choosing learning material and developing indicators and evaluation instruments. The fourth is managing an educational learning. It includes designing comprehensible lesson plan, implementing the lesson plan and applying learning media process and resources. The next aspect is using information and technology in teaching and learning. A teacher should have a competence on building interaction withlearners. The interaction with the students should be built effectively, empathetically, and politely. The next aspect is a teacher should carry out assessment and evaluation. This activity includes determining theaspects of the assessment and evaluation, developing the assessment and evaluation instruments, conducting and analysing the result of the assessment and evaluation. The results of the assessment and evaluation are usedto improve the learning such as designing remedial and enrichment program. The last teacher„s competence on pedagogic competence is conducting reflective action to improve the quality of learning. In Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008, section 2, pedagogic competence is a teacher‟s competence on designing, implementing, and evaluating teaching and learning process. T his competence includes teacher‟s ability on understanding students‟ characteristics. Different students‟ characteristics need different teacher‟s understanding on choosing the method and strategy in the teaching and learning process. Personal competence is teachers‟ competence on: 1 acting in accordance with the norms of religions, law, social, and Indonesian culture; 2 respecting students‟ diversity; 3 presenting themselves as honest persons with noble characters and as the model of their students; 4 showing them selves as mature, wise, stable, and authoritative persons; 5 being proud of becoming teachers and having high responsibilities and self-confidence. In Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008, section 2, in personality competence teachers must have a strong belief in God. They should have mature honest sportive personality and character worthy of imitation. They should have leadership and act wisely. There should be an ability to nurture each student individually. They become the model of their students and the society around them. Objectively they have to evaluate their own work. They need to improve their competence by themselves progressively. Social competence needs teachers‟ consideration for not discriminating students‟ gender, religion, race, physical condition, socio economic status, and family background. The teachers should be objective against the students, colleagues, students‟ parents, and school environment. They should build communication with other educators in scientific communities effectively, empathetically, and courteously. They should be able to adapt themselves to the communities wherever they live. The students‟ parents and school environment are involved in the learning program. The teachers communicate new learning innovation to the school communities. Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008, section 2, states that in social competence, teachers are expected to have an ability to communicate effectively with students, fellow teachers, students‟ parents and the nearby community. They can use communication and information technology on developing students‟ competence. They can develop the collaborative principal with fellow teachers, students‟ parents and the nearby society. Academic competence is te achers‟ competence on understanding the standard and basic competencies of the subject. Teachers should understand on the objectives of the learning. Teachers are able to select the learning material according to the level o f the learners‟ development.Teachers develop their professional with sustainable reflective actions. Teachers should have an ability to conduct classroom action research to develop their professional. They have to update their knowledge and skills by learning from various resources and media.The last competence on academic competence is the application of information and communication technology for communication and professional development. The academic competence in Indonesian Government Regulation Number 74, 2008, section 2, is that teachers should master the subjects to be taught to students widely and comprehensively. They should understand the curriculum. They have to be able to develop the syllabus of the subjects they teach well. The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 16, 2007 on Teachers Competence and Academic Qualification Standard section 18.1. states that teachers of English in primary schools, junior high schools, and senior high schools should have knowledge of various aspects of language in English linguistics, discourse, sociolinguistic, and strategic.They have to master in English language spoken and written, receptive and productive in all aspects of communication linguistic, discourse, sociolinguistic, and strategic. b. The Implementation of Teachers‟ Competence The four competences, pedagogy, personal, social, and academic competences, have a holistic characteristic. They support each other and cannot be separated in their implementation. They are integr ated in teachers‟ activities, on designing, implementing and evaluating teaching and learning process Government Regulation number 74, 2008. To design teaching and learning is to plan the events that take place during the instructional process. Instructional events include actions of both teacher and students in sequence. According to The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 41, 2007, on Standard of Process, instructional design consists of syllabus and lesson plan. Both of them consist of the identity of the subject, standard competence, basic competence, indicators of the basic standard competence achievement, learning objectives, teaching materials, time allocation, teaching method, learning activities, assessment of learning outcomes, and learning media and resources. The syllabus is then developed into lesson plan. The lesson plan describes the procedure of the teaching and learning process from the beginning until the end of the lesson. The procedure of the learning process should be arranged systematically in order to create an interactive, inspirative, joyful, challenging, motivated and creative learning process. The lesson plan is prepared for one basic competence which can be implemented in one session or more. In The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 41, 2007, on Standard of Process, the components of a lesson plan are : 1 the identity of the subject which includes educational unit, class, semester, program, the number of the meetings; 2 competence standard, the minimum qualification of the learner‟s achievement that describes the acquisition of knowledge, skills and attitude to be achieved in each grade or semester of the subject; 3 basic competence, a capability that must be mastered by the learners and as a reference for achievement indicator in a lesson; 4 the achievement indicators of basic competence, learners‟ behaviour that can be measured or observed to demonstrate the achievement of certain basic competence and formulated in operational verbs that can be measured for the knowledge, skills, and attitudes; 5 learning objectives, describes learning process and learning achievement that will be achieved by the learners; 6 learning materials; 7 time allocation; 8 learning method, the atmosphere of teaching and learning process; 9 learning activities, pre-whilst-post activity; 10 evaluation procedure and instrument; 11 learning resources. Some principals should be considered on designing the instructional. They are: a the differen ces of students‟ characteristics; b the instructional learning is students‟ center; c the learning process encourages students to participate actively; d the lesson plan provides feedback and follow up; and e applying information and communication technology. According to The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 41, 2007, on Standard of Process, the implementation of teaching and learning process is the implementation of lesson plan. Teacher follows the procedure arranged in the learning activities in the lesson plan. It includes pre-whilst-post activity. In pre-activity or introduction teacher prepares students psychologically and physically to follow the learning process, asks questions that lead to the prior knowledge of the material that will be studied. In whilst or core activity, learning is developed to achieve the basic competence. The process is interactive, inspirative, exciting, challenging, and motivating the learners to participate actively. The activity provides enough space for learners‟ innovation, creativity, and independence. The process includes exploration, elaboration and confirmation. In the exploration, learners are involved in seeking a broader and deeper information about the topicmaterial, teachers use various intructional approach, media and resources and facilitate learners to interact with each other and with teacher. In the elaboration, teachers give tasks individually or in group to triger new ideas, provide an opportunity to think, analize, act, and solve problem without fear, facilitate learners with cooperative and colaborative learning and to compete in a healthy way. In the confirmation, teachers give feedback and reinforcement orally, written, or with gesture, help learners to solve the difficulty. In post-activity, teacher with learners summaryconclude, reflect the activity they have done. Teachers plan a follow-up activity in the form of remidial or enrichment program. In The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 41, 2007, on Standard Process, classroom management becomes one requirement in a lesson implementation. Teachers arrange the seats based on the learners‟ characteristics and the learning activities to be performed. Teacher‟s voice volume and tone and speech should be heard very well and can be understood by the learners. Teachers create order, discipline, convenience, safety, and regulation in performing the learning process. Teachers provide reinforcement, response, reward, and feed back to the learners. Teachers clothes are polite, clean and neat. Teachers begin and end the learning process due to the time schedule During or after a set of teaching and learning process, an evaluation is done to see the students achievement of one or two basic competence. Patton 1997 mentions that the future of evaluation is tied to the future effectiveness of programs. Therefore, it provides ongoing feedback for improvements during implementation. National Education Department 2004 also defines that evaluation is an identification activity to see the achievement and efficiency of an arranged program and whether it is valuable or not. The Regulation of National Education Minister of Republic of Indonesia Number 41, 2007, on Standard of Process , evaluation is conducted to measure the level of learners‟ achievement on the basic competence, see the learning progress, and improve the learning process. The evaluation is carried out systematically using test-nontest orally or writen in the form of observation, performance, project, portpolio or self-assesment. 3. An Overview of Lesson Study Lesson study is a Japanese form of professional development that centers on collaborative study of live classroom lessons Lewis 2006.In doing lesson study some teachers, usually 4 to 6 teachers make a group of leson study. They are planning a lesson together. One of the teachers implements the lesson plan in the classroom. During the lesson the other teachers are as observers. And then they make a reflection to see what should be revised and improved. Fernandez 2004 defines the term lesson study as a direct translation of a Japanese word jugyoukenkyuu which composed of two words, jugyou and kenkyu.Jugyou means instruction or lesson and kenkyuu meansresearch or study. Lesson study is to describe a collaborative process in which teachers plan a research lesson, teach and observe lesson, revise and reteach the lesson Yoshida 1999. Fernandez 2004 also states that lesson study consists of the study or examination of teaching practice. It is a form of teacher professional development programme that engages teachers collaboratively in planning, implementing, observing and reflecting on the lesson. The teachers progressively improve their teaching methods by examining and giving critique one another‟s teaching techniques. They can learn from and improve their practice by seeing other teachers teach. “Lesson Study functions as a means of enabling teachers to develop and study their own teac hing practices” Takuya 2007: 2. According to Stigler and Hiebert 1999, lesson study is the core form of professional development, and it is often credited for the study improvement of Japanese instruction. Richardson 2004 lesson study is different from lesson planning. Lesson study focuses on what teachers want students to learn rather than on what teachers plan to teach. Lesson planning is a part of lesson study planning. What are studied, observed and evaluated, here are the lesson and the learning not the teacher. Isoda 2006 indicates that lesson study usually begins by developing lesson plan in which teachers solve and pose problems from students‟ perspectives. Teachers share their experiences with other teachers and lecturers.In Japan, lesson study is initiated by teachers and may be sponsored by a variety of organizations, including schools, districts, professional organizations, and independent study groups Lewis and Tsuchida 1998. It has evolved in tens of thousands of sites across Japan. There have been in great variations in lesson study goals, practices, norms and other dimensions. Isoda 2006 indicates the specific objectives of lesson study are to develop instrument and equipment, teaching method and model, teaching material, and teaching evaluation for teaching and learning process. 4. The Implementation of Lesson Study Lesson study involves groups of teachers meeting regularly over a period of time ranging from several months to a year to work on the design, implementation, testing, and improvement of one or several research lessons Stigler and Hiebert 1999. They collaborate and share ideas, opinions, and conclusions regarding to the research lesson. There are eight steps given by Stigler and Hiebert 1999: 1 defining and researching a problem, 2 planning the lesson, 3 teaching and observing the lesson, 4 evaluating the lesson and reflecting on its effect, 5 revising the lesson, 6 teaching and observing the revised lesson, 7 evaluating and reflecting in the second time, and 8 sharing the result. Figure 2.1 describes a lesson study cycle taken from Lewis, Perry, and Murata 2006. In the initial goal-setting phase, teacher participants begin by setting a goal for their students that they are aiming to address in their lesson. This is often something that is difficult for the students to learn or difficult for the teachers to teach. The goal setting leads to the decision for the best instructional strategies that could be used to achieve the goal. Once the lesson is planned, teacher teams decide who will implement the lesson. The lesson is taught and observed, and then a detailed debriefing session and reflection takes place. This debriefing period drives the continuation of the cycle as the next set of goals is established. These final phases of the cycle – implementation reflection debrief – should feel less like a final performance and more like a catalyst for further study and improvement of practice Lewiset al. 2006. Figure 2.1 Lesson Study Cycle Lewis, Perry, and Murata 2006 Lewis 2000 states that lesson study is conducted in all subject areas and non-subject areas such as class meetings and special school-wide activities designed to build community. Lewis 2002 describes that the members of one team of lesson study are 4 – 6 teachers. They can be from the same or different subjects; from the same or different grade; the same or different schools. It is suggested that they are teaching the same subjects and at the same grade. They work together to plan the lesson study, they decide the goal of the lesson study, 1. STUDY CURRICULUM AND FORMULATE GOAL Consider long-term goal for student learning and development Study curriculum and standards identify topic of interest 2. PLAN Select or revise reserch lesson Write instruction plan that includes: Long term goals Anticipated students thinking Data collection plan Model of learning trajectory Rationale for chossen approach 3. CONDUCT RESEARCH One team member conducts the lesson, others observe and collect data 4. REFLECT Formal lesson colloquium in which observers: Share data from lesson Use the data to illuminate student learning, disciplinary content, lesson and unit design, and broader issues in teaching learning Documentation of cycle, to consolidate and carry forward learnings, new questions into next cycle of lesson study arranging the lesson plan and what they will observe in the lesson. One of the teachers implement the lesson plan, while the others observe the teaching and learning in a live classroom lesson. After the lesson they reflect on the lesson by analysing the data they have collected during the lesson collaboratively to see the achievement of their goal. And then they decide whether they will revise the lesson plan and do the lesson study in other class or not. According to Yoshida 1999, there are three main activities that make up lesson study: 1 identifying a lesson study research theme; 2 conducting a small number of research lessons that explore this theme; and 3 reflecting on the process which includes producing the writing report. The first activity, identifying a lesson study research theme, is the process for setting the research themegoal for a specific lesson study involves initial discussions among all teachers of the group. This process is usually carried out at the beginning of the lesson study process. A research theme is usually established by identifying the gap between their students‟ state of learning and understanding and the teachers‟ aspirations for their students, which are based upon the available data and reflecting on classroom practices. In addition, teachers discuss how they want to close performance gaps. Through this exercise, the Japanese teachers establish a research theme and use it as a focus of improvement to conduct their lesson study activities. The research theme is also used to determine the success of the lesson study. In the second activity, a group of teachers jointly draws up a detailed plan for the research lesson. This group usually consists of four to six people. They develop a detailed written research lesson. To prepare a research lesson the teachers discuss the unit they are going to investigate and the specifics of the research lesson they are developing. After the lesson is developed, a teacher from the group teaches the research lesson in a real classroom while other members observe. After the lesson, a debriefing session is held and the observers reflect and discuss the lesson. Things they learn from the discussion are incorporated into the revision of the research lesson and implemented in another classroom. Finally, the lesson plans for the research lesson and thoughts from the discussions are compiled into a written report. The third main activity is reflecting and recording. In order to summarize the lesson study group‟s activity and achievement and keep a record for future use, the school compiles the research lesson plans developed throughout the school year, observation data and notes, samples of students‟ work, discussion notes, and the reflections on the lesson study activity into a final report. This record becomes an important resource for teachers to improve their practice in the future. In Japan, schools produce such lesson study reports and store them at the school as well as the board of education and education centers. They are often distributed at lesson study open houses and to important guests when they visit the school. According to Fernandez 2004, the implementation of lesson study can be different from the way it is implemented in Japan. It does not need to copy what the Japanese do in details. The importance is the lesson study‟s substance. Its substance is the principles of collaboration and collegiality on mutual – learning. Lesson study is defined as a model of professional development for educators by studying teaching and learning activities collaboratively and continually, based on the principles of collegiality and mutual learning to develop a learning community among educators Suratno and Cock 2009. Accordingly, Lesson Study involves a group of educators in a Plan-Do-See cycle, that is, collaborative planning, implementation and observation, and reflection of teaching and learning process. The three stages of lesson study can be explained as follows. First, in the stage of Plan, lesson study team collaboratively develops teaching and learning design based on students ‟ needs and their learning demands. Second, in the stage of Do, an appointed teacher who is called as model teacher implements the planned lesson. The other team members observe the lesson. The observation is mainly at students learning in terms of interaction among students, between students and the model teacher, and students understanding of the content being taught. Third, the reflection or post-class discussion See is conducted soon after the lesson. The appointed teacher model and observers discuss together, led by a moderator as to share evidence resulted from observation, to map identified learning problems and to find alternative solutions for the future lesson improvement Suratno and Cock 2009. Lesson study has three main activities: planning, implementing teaching and observing, and reflecting and revising Sukirman 2006. In the planningphase, the teacher participants first identify the problems found in the classroom. The identification of the problem accompanied by the solution taken are related to the teaching material, schedule, students ‟ characteristic, class condition, teaching method, teaching media, experiment kits, and evaluation toward the teaching process and result. They discuss the choice of teaching material, method, and media based on students‟ characteristic and evaluations to be used. Additional discussion is also focused on the collection of data on the observation sheet, especially about determining the indicator of good teaching – learning process seen from the aspect of teacher and students. Those indicators are written based on the lesson plan and approaches used to reach out to students during the teaching - learning process. Based on the identification andsolution of the problems, it was carried out into a set of steps consisting of: lesson plan, teaching guide, teaching media, evaluation sheet of teaching process result, and observation sheet. Inthe implementation phase, one of the teacher participants implements the lesson plan while other teachers and expert observe the process using the prepared observation sheet. To support it, the observers videotape the process of the teaching and learning process. In the reflection and revising phase, the teacher who implement the lesson plan is given time to state his feeling during the implementation. Next, time is given to observers, both expert and other teachers, to share the data they collect on the students ‟ activity during the implementation followed by showing of the video. The teacher of presentation, then, is asked to respond the observers ‟ comments. The important thing in reflection is to reconsider the lesson plan developed as the basis to make improvements for the next teaching. 5. Lesson Study‟s Difference from ActionResearch Lesson Study shares close similarities with Action research. Both approach emphasize planning, implementation, the conduct of the action or the lesson, and reflection Hock 2010. However there are some differences. Richards 2005 defines that action research refers to teacher-conducted classroom research. The word „research‟ in action research refers to a systematic approach to carrying out investigations and collecting information that is designed to illuminate an issue or problem and to improve classroom practice. The word „action‟ refers to taking practical action to resolve classroom problems. Action research takes place during the process of the teacher‟s own regular classroom. It can be carried out by an individual teacher or in collaboration with other teachers. Collaborative action research may include as few as two teachers or a group of several teachers and others interested in addressing a classroom or departement issue Ferrance 2000. Action research is a reflective process with mainly the purpose of solving a problem or improving the teaching and learning process. Reflection can be defined as the act of critically exploring what you are doing, why you decided to do it and what its effects have been Mertler 2006. The main goal of action research is to address local-level problems with anticipation of finding immediate solutions. Most action research studies are cyclical. Mertler 2006 describes the steps of the process on conducting action research: identifying and limit the topic, review the related literature, develop a research plan, implement the plan and collect the data, analyze the data, develop an action plan, share and communicate the results, and reflect the research. according to Ferrance 2000 there are five phases of inquiry: identification of problem area, collection and organization the data, interpretation the data, action based on the data, and reflection. If the results of one cycle are negative, the cycle may be started again until the results are positive. Lesson Study can be defined as action research conducted by teachers, in which they work collaboratively to reflect on their lessons and improve their teaching Cheng 2011. One main difference is that while Action Research use various research techniques in collecting the data, Lesson Study primarily on peer observation as the main mode of data collection Hock 2010. Lesson Study is collaborative not individualistic, as stated by Elliot 2007 that Lesson Study is carried out by a group of teachers of 3 – 8 members and also in Lewis 2002 that the members of one team of lesson study are 4 – 6 teachers. If lesson Study is not defined as action research, in each cycle a collaboratively planned lesson is taught by different teacher in different class Lewis 2002.

B. Review of Related Studies