29
a. Leaf nuber b. Root dry weight g
c. Plant heightcm d. Diameter of steam cm
c. Total dry weight g
Figure 9 Potato growth as response to combination of biofertilizer and nutrient source: B0 without biofertilizer, B1: liquid biofertilizer, B2:
freezddried biofertilizer without storage, B3: centrifuged biofertilizer without storage, A1:50 NPK, A2: 100 NPK. Stander error SE
which show no different significant by Duncan test at 0.05.
Plant Production A. Effect of Biofertilizer on Production of Tomato Plant
The result showed that the application of biofertilizer causes increased of average of crop production of tomato plant Figure 10. There was no significant
improvement in number fruit per plant and number fruitcluster but the fruit weight per plant was increase as response to biofertilizer Figure 10. The
improvement was due to increase of fruit size indicated by higher fruit weight per
100 200
300 400
500 600
B0 B1
B2 B3
le af
n u
m b
e r
p lan
t
treatment
A1 A2
20 40
60
B0 B1
B2 B3
p lan
t h
igh c
m
treatment
A1 A2
50 100
150 200
B0 B1
B2 B3
to tal
d r
y w
ie gh
tg
treatment
A1 A2
0,5 1
1,5 2
2,5 3
B0 B1
B2 B3
r o
o t
d r
y w
ie gh
tg
treatment
A1 A2
0,2 0,4
0,6 0,8
1 1,2
B0 B1
B2 B3
ste am
d iam
e te
r
treatment
A1 A2
Create PDF files without this message by purchasing novaPDF printer
http:www.novapdf.com
30
plant. In total plant, the production also increased significantly as response to biofertilizer. The higher increase of fruit weight per plant by application of B4
that contains high amount of viable microbial population by approximately
1,98x10
8
cellml more than B3 6,2x10
4
cellml, B5 and B2 Table 1. Generally, application with centrifuged biofertilizer showed increased the fruit weight per
plant rather than freezedried biofertilizer. In production per plot, the higher increase was by application with B2 4,1x10
7
cellml and the lowest production by application of B3 6.2x10
4
cellml.
a. Number Fruit cluster b. Number of fruit per plant
c. Fruit weightkg per plant d. Plant production per plot
Figure 10 Tomato plant production as response to biofertilizer application. B0: without biofertilizer, B1: liquid biofertilizer, B2: freezedried
biofertilizer without storage, B3: freezedried biofertilizer with 3 months storage, B4: centrifuged biofertilizer with out storage and B5:
centrifuged biofertilizer with 3 months storage. Stander error SE which show no different significant by Duncan test at 0.05.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
B0 B1
B2 B3
B4 B5
n u
m b
e r
fr u
it c
lu ste
r
biofertilizer
0,50 1,00
1,50 2,00
2,50
B0 B1
B2 B3
B4 B5
fr u
it w
ie gh
t k
g p
lan t
biofertilizer
0,5 5,5
10,5 15,5
20,5 25,5
30,5 35,5
40,5
B0 B1
B2 B3
B4 B5
n u
m b
e r
fr u
it p
lan t
biofertilizer
5 25
45 65
85 105
B0 B1
B2 B3
B4 B5
p r
o d
u c
ti o
n p
lo tk
g
biofertilizer
Create PDF files without this message by purchasing novaPDF printer
http:www.novapdf.com
31
b. Effect of Biofertilizer on Production of Potato Plant
Kategori