Sea bottom substrate Sea surface temperature regime

understand the response of sea surface temperature condition at high and low abundance of green turtle nesting in Pangumbahan. High abundance of green turtle nesting is represented by data by October 2011 and the low one is represented by April 2011. There were 191 individuals of green turtles nesting in October 2011 and 191 individuals in April 2011UPTD Konservasi Penyu Pangumbahan, unpbublished data see Appendix 4a. There was a highly differing pattern of sea surface temperature between the times of high and low abundance green turtle landing at Pangumbahan beach. Sea surface temperature at the high nesting abundance period of time October 2011 was cooler than at low April 2011 see Figure 22 a-d. There was also temperature gradient signature at the high nesting abundance period of time October 2011 while at low nesting abundance temperature was evenly distributed. During the high nesting abundance, temperature around Pangumbahan beach was more or less even with adjacent near shore habitat. However, all this inferences was mainly based on interpretation and speculation. To confirm these inferences, there should be a further investigation compiling green turtle migration and seawater temperature cues by satellite telemetry. 42 Figure 22a Sea surface temperature regime around Pangumbahan beach during high nesting abundance October 2011 - day Pangumbahan Oct 01 - Day 43 Figure 22b Sea surface temperature regime around Pangumbahan beach during high nesting abundance October 2011 - night Pangumbahan Oct 01 - Night 44 Figure 22c Sea surface temperature regime around Pangumbahan beach during lowest nesting abundance April 2011 - day Pangumbahan Apr 01 - Day 45 Figure 22d Sea surface temperature regime around Pangumbahan beach at low nesting abundance April 2011-night Pangumbahan Apr 01 - Night 46

5. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORKS

5.1. Conclusion

Abundance distribution of green turtle nesting along Pangumbahan beach was uneven. Most adult female green turtle Chelonia mydas had preferences to land and nest at the middle part of the beach Pos 2. There was indication that topography, substrate type and fewer disturbances at this beach segment was the factor influencing nest fidelity. Pos 2 was characterized as wide, less steep, free from creeper plant burdens, and less disturbance by human and light. Seaturtle conservation strategy in Pangumbahan beach includes eggs relocation from natural beach into hatchery sites. All eggs were treated similarly. A contrasting temperature and humidity pattern occurred at natural nests and artificial nests. In general, artificial nest temperature was slightly warmer than the original nest at nature condition. The recent massive mortality event of smaller sized hatchlings at the hatchery may be attributed by this factor. Shading level at hatchery sites influences ambient sand temperature at surface and subsurface ±10 cm depth. The unshaded area at open cage hatchery caused highest temperature while the hatchery with asbestos roof caused cooler and more stable temperature. It is confirmed that temperature conditions of natural nests and artificial nests were dissimilar. Based on substrate type information, we may imply that Pangumbahan was selected as nesting beach because of its accessibility from open sea. Extensive foods are available around the shore where the potential foraging habitat is indentified at Muara Cikarang. It supported with food availability and turtle sightings evident. There was contrasting sea surface temperature pattern when high and low nesting green turtle abundance occurred. Sea surface temperature at period of high nesting abundance October 2011 was cooler than at low period April 2011. The sea surface temperature was unevenly distributed at high nesting abundance period but even at low period. During the night of high nesting abundance, there was low temperature pool around Pangumbahan and along the shore. It may be cue for green turtle to find the nesting beach. 47

5.2. Recommendations and Future works

This study leads to some recommendation. It is strongly recommend that the UPTD Konservasi Penyu Pangumbahan alter their conservation strategy. It is best to secure the nesting beach area completely and let the eggs to hatch naturally. Meanwhile, there are some changes should be done for hatchery management. The relocated eggs are more advisable to be reburied at open cage hatchery. The depth of artificial nest should resemble the natural condition or at least adjusted with the amount of eggs. Deeper depth of nest should be made for more abundant eggs so that it would not too close to surface sand. In addition, tourism activity should be limited; it is advisable to limit not more than ten visitors during turtle watching activity at night. It is worth to investigate the incubation temperature continuously at hatchery and natural nests and compare them. Furthermore, estimate the hatched hatchlings sex ratio within each nest. The output will help to develop and to support seaturtle conservation strategy. Migration study is required to identify foraging area which is also crucial to protect. 48 REFERENCES Arief, S., Suwahyuono and N. Salam. 2010. Coral Reef Survey and Mapping in Selaru Island, Southeast Maluku Regency, Maluku Province, Indonesia, Center for Marine Resources Surveys, National Coordinating Agency for Survey and Mapping, Indonesia Barlian, A. 1987. Kultur in vitro gonad penyu hijau Chelonia mydas pada suhu tinggi. Tesis Sarjana Biologi Jurusan Biologi. ITB. 36 hal. Bjorndal, K. A. 1980. Nutrition and Grazing Behavior of the Green Turtle Chelonia mydas . Marine Biology 56, 147-154 1980 Bjorndal, K. A. 1999. Priorities for Research in Foraging Habitats In K. L. Eckert, K. A. Bjorndal, F. A. Abreu-Grobois, M. Donnelly Editors. 1990. Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea TurtlesIUCNSSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4 Bolten, A.B. 1999. Techniques for Measuring Sea Turtles. In K. L. Eckert, K. A. Bjorndal, F. A. Abreu-Grobois, M. Donnelly Editors. 1999. Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles. IUCNSSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4 Broderick A.C., B.J. Godley, S. Reece, and J.R. Downie. 2000. Incubation periods and sex ratios of green turtles: highly female biased hatchling production in the eastern Mediteranian. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 202: 273-281 Bustard, R. 1972. Sea turtles. Natural history and conservation. William Collins Sons Co Ltd. Glasgow Dermawan, A., and I.B.W. Adnyana eds. 2003. Pedoman pengelolaan konservasi penyu dan habitatnya. Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan RI. Jakarta. 45p. Diez, C.E. and J.E. Ottenwalder. 1999. Habitat Surveys. In K. L. Eckert, K. A. Bjorndal, F. A. Abreu-Grobois, M. Donnelly Editors. 1990. Research and Management Techniques for the Conservation of Sea TurtlesIUCNSSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4, 1999 Glen, F., A.C. Broderick, B.J. Godley and G.G. Hays. 2003. Incubation environment affects phenotype of naturally incubated green turtle hatchlings. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 2003, 83: 1183-1186 http:edcsns17.cr.usgs.govEarthExplorer 49 http:soils.usda.govtechnical handbookcontentspart618.html http:wildlifetracking.org Hutabarat, H.P. and P.L.K. Mustika. 2003. Working toward alternatives to the commercial concession of green turtle eggs in Pangumbahan beach Sukabumi, West Java, Indonesia. In: Pilcher, N.J. compiler. 2006. Proceedings of the twenty-third annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-SEF5C-536, pp: 56-57. Limpus, C.J. 1997. Marine turtle populations of southeast asia and the western pacific region: Distribution and status. In: Noor, Y.R., I.R. Lubis, R. Ounsted, S. Troeng and A. Abdullah eds. 1997. Proceedings of the workshop on marine turtle research and management in Indonesia. Jember, East Java, November 1996. Wetlands InternationalPHPAEnvironment Australia, Bogor. p: 37-73. Lopez-Mendilaharsu, M., S.C. Gardner, R. Riosmena-Rodriguez and J.A. Seminoff. 2006. Diet preferences by East Pacific green turtles Chelonia mydas in Bahia Magdalena, Mexico. In: Pilcher, N.J. compiler. 2006. Proceedings of the twenty third annual symposium of turtle biology and conservation. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-536, p: 14- 17 Marquez-M., R. 1990. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 11: Sea turtles of the world. An annotated and illustration catalogue of sea turtle species known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis. No. 125, Vol 11. Rome, FAO. 1990. 81p. McCleery, R. H., T. A. Watt and T. Hart. 2007. Introduction to statistics for biology third edition. Chapman HallCRC Taylor Francis Group. Boca Raton, USA. pp: xxi-273 Miller, J. D. 1997. Reproduction in sea turtles. In Lutz P.L. and J.A. Musick eds. The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p: 52-71 Nuitja, I.N.S. dan I.Uchida. 1983. Studies in The Sea Turtle-II The Nesting Site Characteristics Of The Hawksbill And Green Turtle. A journal of Museum Zoologicum Bogor. 29 1: 63-79. Bogor Nuitja, I.N.S. 1992. Biologi dan Ekologi Pelestarian Penyu Laut. IPB Press. Bogor. xii + 127 h.