Overviewing Direct Instruction Instructional Goals and Learners Outcomes

22 This refers to children’s general language development. There are many similarities between learning one’s mother tongue and learning a foreign language in spite of differences in age and the time available. So far no body has found a universal pattern of language learning which everyone agrees with. Much seems to depend on which mother tongue the pupils speak and on social and emotional factors in the child’s background. What is clear here is that most eight to ten years olds will have some sort of language awareness and readiness which they bring with them into the foreign language classroom.

C. Direct Instruction

1. Overviewing Direct Instruction

A general overview of the direct instruction model uses the analytical scheme introduced in the introduction, which provides the following features: · The model’s instructional goals and effects the model has on learners including required assessment procedures. · The model’s syntax or overall pattern and flow of instructional activity. · The model’s learning environment and management system required to make particular lessons employing it effective. James M. Wolf 2000: 373 says that direct instruction has its theoretical origins in the behavioral family, particularly in the thinking of training and behavioral psychologists. Training psychologists have focused on training people to perform complex behaviors that involve a high degree of precision and often 23 coordination with others- for example being a crew member on a submarine. Their main contributions to learning situations are task definition and task analysis. The instructional design principles they propose focus on conceptualizing learner performance into goals and tasks, breaking this into smaller component tasks, developing training activities that ensure mastery of each subcomponent, and, finally arranging the entire learning situation into sequences that ensure adequate transfer from one component to another and achievement of pre- requisite learning before more advanced learning.

2. Instructional Goals and Learners Outcomes

Learning theories normally distinguish between two types of knowledge: declarative knowledge and procedural knowledge Marx Winne, 1994; Ryle, 1949; Gagne, 1977; Gagne, 1985. Declarative verbalizable knowledge is knowledge about something or that something is the case. Procedural knowledge, on the other hand, is knowledge about how to do something. An example of declarative knowledge is knowledge about the three branches of government: that the legislative branch has two chambers the house and senate and that representatives to the house are elected to 6 years terms. Procedural knowledge about this same topic is knowledge about, if one is a citizen, how to got the polling place and vote on Election Day and how to write a letter to a senator, how to guide a bill through the senate until it becomes a law. According to Arends 1997: 66 the direct instruction model was specially designed to promote student learning of procedural knowledge and declarative 24 knowledge that is well structured and can be taught in a step- by- step fashion. Table 1.1 illustrates instructional objectives aimed at promoting the acquired of basic declarative knowledge and straightforward procedural knowledge and compares this type of objective with those that promote social learning and higher- level thinking. Differences can be observed in the various types of objectives listed in table 1.1. For instance, the first objective expects the student to be able to identify the rules of ice hockey. This is important declarative knowledge for students who wish to be involved in the game. However, being able to identify the rules does not mean that the student can perform any skills associated with hockey like passing on the move, the content of the procedural knowledge found in column 2. Further, neither knowing the rules nor having specific hockey skills will necessarily lead to being a good teammate or to bringing critical judgment to the way the sport is conducted, the aim of the objectives found in column 3 and 4. Direct instruction is a suitable approach to instruction when the teacher wants students to learn particular skills or straightforward declarative knowledge such as those found in columns 1 and 2. It is a teacher- centered model that has five steps: set induction, demonstration, guided practice, feedback and extended practice. There are five essential phases or steps in most direct instruction lesson. The teacher begins the lesson by providing a rationale for the lesson, establishing set, getting students ready to learn. This preparation and motivational phase is then followed by presentation of the subject’s matter being taught or demonstration of a particular skill. The lesson concludes with opportunities for student’s practice 25 and teacher feedback on their progress. During the practice- feedback phase of this model, teacher should always try to provide opportunities for students to transfer the knowledge or skill being taught to real life situations. The five phases of the direct instruction models are summarized in table 1.2. Table 1.1 Sample Direct Instruction Objectives Compared To Social Learning or Higher- level Thinking Objectives Acquisition of Basic Knowledge Skill Acquisition Social understanding Higher level Students will be able to list the basic rules of hockey Students will be able to pass while moving Students will display cooperation while playing a hockey game Students will express an opinion in regard to the presence of violence in hockey Table 1.2 Syntax of the Direct Instruction Model Phases Teacher Behavior Phase 1 Teacher goes over objectives for the lesson, Provide objective and gives background information and explains Establish the set why the lesson is important. Get students ready to learn. 26 Phase 2 Teacher demonstrates the skill correctly or Demonstrate knowledge or presents step by step information Skill Phase 3 Teacher structures initial practice Provide guided practice Phase 4 Teacher checks to see if students are performing Check understanding and correctly and provides feedback. Provide feedback Phase 5 Teacher sets conditions for extended practice Provide extended practice with attention to transfer to more complex and and transfer real life situation.

3. Learning Environment and Management System

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH BOARD GAMES (A Classroom Action Research at the Fourth Grade of SDN Cengklik II Surakarta in 2009 2010 Academic Year)

0 11 81

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI NGABEAN 3 KART

0 0 15

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH INQUIRY- BASED TEACHING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SD NEGERI NGABEAN 3 KARTASURA IN 2009/ 2010 ACADEMIC YEAR).

0 0 6

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH OSTENSIVE MEANS IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH OSTENSIVE MEANS (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IN THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 DONOHUDAN).

0 0 9

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH OSTENSIVE MEANS (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IN THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 DONOHUDAN).

0 0 7

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH SONGS A Classroom Action Research in The Third Grade Students of SD Negeri Tangkil 1 in the Academic Year 20102011

0 1 96

1. Vocabulary Mastery - IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY THROUGH SONGS (A Classroom Action Research CAR Study of the Fourth Grade Students of SDN 04 MERENG in the Academic Year 2010/2011) - repository perpustakaan

0 0 20

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH TELLING OBJECTS (TOYS, REPLICA, AND MINIATURE) (A Classroom Action Research at the Fourth Grade Students of SD N1 Talagening Bobotsari Purbalingga in the Academic Year 20112012)

0 0 11

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY THROUGH WORD WALL GAME (A Classroom Action Research of the 8th Grade Students in SMP Negeri 2 Kesugihan in the Academic Year of 2014-2015)

1 1 15