66
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusion
Based on the findings and discussion, it can be concluded that: 1.
It was found all cohesive devices used in whole text state examination UN from years 2010 until 2015 were namely: reference, substitution,
ellipsis, conjuction and lexical cohesion 2.
Based on the data the dominant types cohesive devices from text English state examination UN in years 2010 until 2015 were Reference
32144.8 3.
After analyzing 25 texts English state examination UN from years 2010 until 2015 with context situation conducted. Found that the context
situation used in the texts were of three elements, namely, field, tenor and mode
and in Specifically, field used the elements of arena or social activity
, participant’s characteristics and semantic domain And in tenor found used three elements from four there were formality, status or power,
affection . And in mode found used elements Planning, Distance,
Involvement and medium or channel.
5.2 Suggestion
As what the researcher result shown that the analyzed cohesive device in texts English state examination UN from 2010 until 2015. Categorized cohesive
good for students of senior high school, it is suggested that:
67 a.
English texts used by the student in the class to learn how to produce good and accepted sentences
b. English teacher and the headmaster can be involved in the process of
learning English used texts as knowledge to teaching. c.
For the writer state examination is also expected to involve in controlling the quality of English Text state examination UN every years used in test
UN. So the students can get knowledge from learning texts in order the student may understand the texts better
REFERENCE
Bloor, T and Bloor, M. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English: An Hallidayan Approach. Great Britain: Arnold.
Bogdan, R. Biklen, S. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education 2
nd
ed . Boston: Allan and Bacon
Brown, G and Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis . London : Cambridge University Press Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publication Gasson, S. 2004. Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on
generating theory from qualitative field studies. In M. E. Whitman A. B. Woszczynski Eds., The handbook of information systems research pp. 79
–102. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K and R. Hasan 1985. Context and Text: Aspects of Language in Social
Semiotic Perspectives . Geelong: Deakin University Press
Hyland, K.2007.Genre and Second Language Writing, the USA: the University of Michigan Press.
Irwin,J.W. 1983. Understanding and Teaching Cohesion Comprehension. In J.W. Irwin Ed.. Cohesion and Comprehension. A Research Review, pp.31-34, Newark DE:
International reading Association. Lickie-Tarry, H.1995. Language and Context: A Functional Linguistics Theory of Register.
London: Pinter Lindsay, D.B.1985. Cohesion in the Composition of ESL and English Students, M.A.
Thesis, University of California. Martin, J.R. 2003. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and
H.E. Halminton Eds. Cohesion and Texture, pp.35-53. The U.K: Blackwell Publishing.
Martin, J.R.1986. “Intervening in the Process of Writing Development”. Dalam Painter, C and J.R. MartinEditor Writing to Mean: TeachingGenres Across the Curriculum.
Applied Linguistics Association of Australia. Occasional Papers Number 9
Kategori