Multivariable Control System Architecture and Frequency Domain Analysis

 ISSN: 1693-6930 TELKOMNIKA Vol. 14, No. 1, March 2016 : 162 – 170 164   1.4293272.5 1 12 175.9 1126.3 1 10 1      s g s s s 2   0.6073 21 32.7 1 141.5 1     g s s 3   0.728284.9 1 22 201.3 194.66 1 283.6 1      s g s s s 4

3. Frequency Domain Analysis of Coordinated System

As we all know, a precise mathematical model is required to the controlled object in the state space theory, the designed controller structure for multivariable system is quite complex, so that it is difficult to apply. In engineering, frequency domain analysis is a commonly methods of design and integration for control system. But coordinated system is a multiple-inputsand multiple-outputs coupling system,the Nyquist method often applied to analysis and optimized design a single variable, has no longer any meaning [11]. In this section, we use the inverse Nyquist array INA to conduct thefrequency domain analysis, and adopt pseudo diagonalization to develop a decoupling design for the above system.

3.1. Multivariable Control System Architecture and Frequency Domain Analysis

Stability is one of the most important indexes for control system design. For single-input single-output SISO system, the characteristic roots surrounded by -1, j0 in a closed loop system can determine the distribution of its stability. But this method isnot suitable for multi-input and multi-output MIMO system, the stability identification of multivariable system is judged through the properties of return difference determinant of the system. Multivariable system diagram is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Diagram of multivariable control system Where, Gs presents the controlled systems, Kcps can be seen as a pre- compensator, Kcs is dynamic corrector, Hs is called the feedback gain matrix, Qs represents the system forward channel matrix, then the transfer function matrix of the closed- loop system can be written as:   1    c G I Q s H s Q s 5 In which, |Ds |=|I+QsHs | 6 The above equation 6 is called the return difference determinant of the system. Based on the inverse Nyquist array INAof return difference matrix Ds, engineerings often use Gershgorin theorem to get the circumference number, which is surrounded with the points 0, j0 by Gershgorin circles, and then observe whether Ds is diagonal dominance, and finally they can judge the stability of the system. TELKOMNIKA ISSN: 1693-6930  Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Thermal Power Unit Coordinated… Ruiqing Zhang 165 The inverse Nyquist array method does not require the system completely decoupled, as long as the compensated system has diagonal dominance, which makes controller design become easy. When the number of input variables is the same as the number of output in system, assumed the number of input variable as the q-th, at j ω0 point, thus INA for the system transfer function matrix is expressed as a complex number. , , 1, , ik ik ik g j j i k q         7 For the values of m m = 1, ..., q, we can obtain a matrix Am. In which, , ∑ , , , 1, ⋯ , 8 Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix Am are computed. The eigenvectors of the minimum eigenvalues constitute a column vector of km, and then through all of the m values; finally we obtain the smallest feature vectors, which constitute the compensation matrix Kcp. Appling above the method, in the frequency ω = 0, we can get the precompensated array of Kcp for a boiler-turbine coordination system. Gershgorin band diagram of the system after compensated are carried out.

3.2. Diagonally Dominant Analysis of the Supercritical Unit Coordinated System