Deining quality quality improvement training for healthcare professionals

THE HEALTH FOUNDATION 7 Evidence scan: Quality improvement training for healthcare professionals his section briely describes the scope and methods of the scan. Section 2 outlines some of the content and teaching methods used in quality improvement training. Section 3 explores the efectiveness of various types of training.

1.2 Deining quality

im prove m e nt Quality improvement is not solely about ‘making things better’ by doing the same things and ‘trying harder’. Instead, quality improvement requires a diferent approach to traditional ‘fact-based’ learning and needs a new set of knowledge and skills to put this approach into practice. For the purposes of this scan, training in quality improvement was deined as any activity that explicitly aimed to teach health professionals about methods or skills that could be used to improve quality. Table 1 lists the domains of quality improvement that the Health Foundation is interested in. he scan focused on training to support health professionals to develop knowledge and skills in these key areas. Quality improvement was not deined solely as ‘continuous quality improvement’, ‘total quality management’ or other named models, but rather as a way of approaching change in healthcare that focuses on self-relection, assessing needs and gaps, and considering how to improve in a multifaceted manner. In this deinition, training about quality improvement aims to create an ethos of continuous relection and a commitment to ongoing improvement. It aims to provide practitioners and managers with the skills and knowledge needed to assess the performance of healthcare and individual and population needs, to understand the gaps between current activities and best practice and to have the tools and conidence to develop activities to reduce these gaps. hus, the scan did not focus only on narrowly deined quality improvement models such as ‘plan, do, study, act’ PDSA cycles, Six Sigma, LEAN and so on – although it included courses that deined quality improvement in this way too. Courses about techniques such as evidence-based medicine, statistics and leadership were only included if the stated aim was to improve quality. Courses about improving a speciic condition or pathway were included if they incorporated material about improvement techniques that could also be widely applied to other topics. Terminology he focus was on accredited education and ongoing training through courses and workshops rather than resources such as books, mentoring, fellowships or other learning methods. he term ‘education’ is oten used to describe formal courses run by higher educational institutions whereas the term ‘training’ is broader and encompasses CPD and short courses run by a variety of providers. For simplicity, the scan uses the general term ‘training’ to apply to both formally accredited education and other CPD. Unless otherwise speciied, the trends reported are generalised to relect what is happening throughout the Western world. THE HEALTH FOUNDATION 8 Evidence scan: Quality improvement training for healthcare professionals Table 1: Potential components of quality improvement 14 Components Examples of topic areas The wider context How the health system is structured and how it works Historical, social and political context within which health systems develop and operate Health policy Accountability Professionalism Human behaviour Psychology of change Learning styles Leadership Teamwork and collaboration Management Multidisciplinary working Reflection and learning from mistakes Needs and preferences of people who use health services Seeing healthcare from the user’s perspective Identifying and targeting the needs and preferences of different subgroups of users Acquiring tools to assess and respond to users Healthcare as a process Systems thinking Complexity theory and interdependencies Spread Sustainability Planning and predicting Understanding risk and risk management The nature of knowledge Different forms of evidence The philosophy of science Variation Measurement Local versus generalisable knowledge Small versus large scale change Collecting, analysing and interpreting data Reporting and displaying information Process mapping THE HEALTH FOUNDATION 9 Evidence scan: Quality improvement training for healthcare professionals

1.3 Ide ntifying e vide nc e