Giving the treatment Administering the post-test

� 1 = XY X 2 Y 2 Note: r 1 : coefficient or reliability between first and second half group X : Total numbers of first half group Y : Total numbers of second half group X 2 : square of X Y 2 : square of Y Lado 1961 in Hughes, 1991: 3 The researcher used “Spearmen Brown’s Prophecy formula” Hatch and Farhady, 1982 :262 to know the coefficient correlation of the whole items. The formula is as follow: � = 2 � 1 + � Where : rk : the reliability of the test rl : the reliability of the half test The criteria of reliability are: 0.90 – 1.00 : high 0.50 – 0.89 : moderate 0.0 - 0.49 : low

3. Level of difficulty

To see the level of difficulty, the researcher used following formula: LD = � � Where: LD : Level of difficulty R : the number of the students who answer correctly N : the total number of the students following the test The criteria tests are: 0.30 : difficult 0.30 – 0.70 : average 0.70 : easy Shohamy, 1985: 79

4. Discrimination Power

To see the discrimination power, the researcher used the following formula: DP = � − � 1 2 � Where : DP : discrimination power U : the proportion of the upper group students L : the proportion of the lower group students N : total number of the students The criteria are: 1 If the value is positive discrimination, it means that more high level students than low-level students get the correct. If the value is zero, it means that no discrimination. 2 If the value is negative, means that more low level students than the high level students get the item correct. 3 In general, the higher the discrimination index, the better. In the classroom situation most items should be higher than 0.20 indexes Shohamy, 1985:81.

5. Scoring System

In scoring the students ’ result of the test, the researcher used Arikunto formula. The ideal high score is 100. The score of the pre-test was calculated by using formula as follow: S = � � 100 Where : S : The score of the test R : The total of the correct answer N : The total items Arikunto, 1997:212

3.6. Data Analysis

The researcher analyzed the data statistically using Statiscal Program for Social Science SPSS. The step of the researcher analyzed the data: 1. Administering the normality of the distribution test Normality test was used to know whether the data of both classes are normally distributed or not. In testing the data, the researcher used T-test. The criteria of the test are as follows:

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING SIMPLE PAST TENSE TAUGHT THROUGH GROUP WORK AND TAUGHT THROUGH INDIVIDUAL STUDY

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PREPOSITION OF PLACE TAUGHT THROUGH REALIA AND TAUGHT THROUGH PICTURES AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMPN 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 27

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH SQ3R AND TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 69 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH DIALOGUE VIDEO AND ANIMATION MOVIE AT SMAN 12 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 7 63