2.10.1 Direct Time Study 45
2.10.1.1 Performance Rating 46 – 47
2.10.1.2 Allowances 47
2.10.2 Standard Time 48
2.10.3 Predetermined Time Standards PTS 48 – 49
2.11 MOST Work Measurement Techniques 50
2.11.1 Concepts of MOST 50 – 51
2.11.2 Advantages of MOST 50 - 51
2.11.3 Sequence Method 51
2.11.3.1 General Move Sequence Model 52 – 53
2.11.3.2 Controlled Move Sequence Model 54
2.11.3.3 Tool Use Sequence Model 55
2.11.4 Accuracy 55
2.12 Lean Six Sigma: Workplace Measurement 56 – 57
2.13 System Development Model 57 – 58
2.14 Current Study on MOST and Lean Six Sigma 58
2.14.1 Case Study 1: Lithonia Lighten Workload, Improve Productivity H.B Maynard and Company Inc
58 – 59
2.14.2 Case Study 2: Six Sigma Case Study at Manufacturing Unit Desai Shrivastava, 2008
59 – 60
2.14.3 Case Study 3: Improving Computer Manufacturing Management through Lean Six Sigma and PHM Niu
et al., 2010 61
2.14.4 Case Study 4: Using Simulation with Design for Six Sigma in a Server Manufacturing Environment
Ramakrishnan et al. 2008 62 – 63
2.15 Summary 63
3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 64 - 77
3.1 Introduction 64
3.2 Planning of Study 64 – 65
3.3 Project Methodology 66 – 67
3.3.1 Phase 1 : Define 67
3.3.2 Phase 2 : Measure 68
3.3.2.1 Time Taken 68
3.3.2.2 Accuracy 68
3.3.2.3 Speed of data process 69
3.3.3 Phase 3: Analysis 69
3.3.4 Phase 4 : Improve 69
3.3.5 Phase 5 : Control 70
3.4 Approach Used for Template System Development
70
3.4.1 Requirement Definition 71
3.4.2 System and Software Design 71
3.4.3 Implementation and Unit Testing 71
3.4.4 Integration and System Testing 71
3.5 Problem Statement Identification 71 – 72
3.6 Data Collection 72
3.6.1 Primary Source 72 – 73
3.6.2 Secondary Sources 73
3.7 Data Analysis 73
3.7.1 Quality of Data 74
3.8 The Synchronization of Objectives and Methodology 74
3.9 Conceptual Design 74 – 75
3.10 Project Schedule and Milestone 76 – 77
3.11 Summary 77
4.0 COMPANY PROFILE 78 – 84
4.1 Company Background 78
4.1.1 History Background 78 – 79
4.1.2 Group Structure 79
4.2 Board of Director 80
4.3 Company Vision and Mission 80
4.3.1 Vision 80
4.3.2 Mission 80
4.4 Company Location 81
4.5 CTRM Aero-Composite CTRM-AC
81 – 82
4.6 Product and Process Involve 83
4.6.1 A380 83
4.6.2 A320 and A321 83 – 84
4.6.3 Goodrich V2500 84
5.0 AUTOMATE MAYNARD OPERATION SEQUENCE
TECHNIQUE MOST TEMPLATE DEVELOPMENT
85 – 96
5.1 Introduction 85
5.2 Template Architecture 85 – 86
5.3 Conceptual Design 86 – 89
5.4 Design on Automated MOST Template 90
5.4.1 User Interface Design 90
5.4.1.1 Navigation Design 90
5.4.1.2 Input Design Interface 91 – 92
5.4.1.3 Output Design Interface 93 – 95
5.4.1.4 Data Store Design 96
5.5 Conclusion 96
6.0 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 97 – 134
6.1 Introduction 97
6.2 Goodrich Phase II Process 97 – 98
6.3 Analyzing the Case Study and MOST Template Using Six Sigma DMAIC Approach
98
6.3.1 Stage 1
st
: DEFINE 98
6.3.1.1 Layup Process 98 – 101
6.3.2 Stage 2
nd
: MEASURE 101
6.3.2.1 Collecting Data 102
6.3.2.2 Result for Cone Fairing Layup 103
6.3.2.3 Result for Torque Ring Layup 104
6.4 Overall Labor Effectiveness OLE 105
6.4.1 OLE Calculation for Cone Fairing Layup 105 – 108
6.4.2 OLE Comparison 108 – 110
6.4.2.1 Comparison Between the Current MOST template and New Automated MOST Template
110 – 116
6.4.3 Stage 3
rd
: ANALYZE 116
6.4.3.1 Analyze Automated MOST Template 116 – 122
6.4.3.2 Developing Standard Time 123
6.4.3.3 Data Calculation 123 – 133
6.4.4 Stage 4
th
: IMPROVE 133 – 134
6.4.5 Stage 5
th
: CONTROL 134
6.5 Conclusion 134
7.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 135 - 139
