THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’
ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR
LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF
SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG
By
SIH KADARWATI
A Script
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for S-1 Degree
In
The Language and Art Department of
the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

TEACHER TRAINING EDUCATION FACULTY
UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG
BANDAR LAMPUNG
2012

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN
GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION
AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

(A Script)

By:
Sih Kadarwati

TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG
BANDAR LAMPUNG
2012

CURRICULUM VITAE
Sih Kadarwati was born on August 11, 1989 in Central Lampung. Her father, Drs.
Marsudi, is a teacher in SMP Negeri 1 Sekampung Udik and her mother, Suharti,
S.Pd. is also a teacher in SD Negeri 3 Pugungraharjo. She has one sister named
Wulandari, S.P. and one brother named Anung Suwito.

She entered SD Kristen 5 Pugungraharjo in 1995 and graduated in 2001. She
continued her study to SMP Negeri 1 Sekampung Udik and gradueted in 2004.
She finished her high school at SMA Negeri 3 Bandar Lampung in 2007.


In 2007, she was registered as a student of Lampung University at the English
Program at the Teacher Training and Education Faculty through the SPMB. In
2011, she carried on Teaching Practice Program (PPL) at SMA Negeri 5 Bandar
Lampung and did the research in that school. In the 8th semester she was accepted
at RCK Rumah Cerdas Kirana. She also teaches as a private teacher in that
semester until now.

CONTENT
Page
ABSTRACT...........................................................................................
i
APPROVAL..........................................................................................
ii
CURRICULUM VITAE........................................................................
vi
DEDICATION.......................................................................................
vii
MOTTO.................................................................................................
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.....................................................................

ix
CONTENT..............................................................................................
xii
LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................
xiv
LIST OF THE APPENDICES................................................................
xv
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Problem…………………………………....... 1
B. Formulation of the Problem……………………………………... 4
C. Objective of the Research………………………………………... 4
D. Uses of the Research……………………………………………... 4
E. Scope of the Research ……………………………………………. 5
F. Definition of Terms…………………………………………….... 5
CHAPTER II. FRAME OF THEORIES
A. Concept of Genre……….…………………………….................
B. Concept of Narrative’s Generic Structure………………………..
C. Concept of Recount’s Generic Structure…………………………
D. Concept of Procedure’s Generic Structure...................................
E. Concept of Listening…………………………….........................

F. Correlation between Generic Structure and Listening
Comprehension…………………………………………………..
G. Theoretical Assumption………………………………………….
H. Hypothesis………………………………………………………..

6
8
12
13
14
22
23
23

CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Design…………………………………………………. 24
B. Population and Sample………………………………………….. 24
C. Research Instrument……….. …………………………………... 25
D. Validity and Reliability of the Instruments ……………….........
26

1. Validity of the Instrument…………………....……………... 26
2. Reliability of the Instrument………………………………... 27
E. Research Procedure……………………………………………... 29
F. Data Analysis……………………………………………………. 30
G. Hypothesis Testing ……………………………………………... 31

CHAPTER IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A. The Result of the Research ..........................................................
1. Realibility of the Test..............................................................
2. Validity of the Test..................................................................
3. The Result of Students’ Generic Structure Test.......................
4. The Result of Listening Comprehension Test..........................
5. The Correlation between Achievement in Generic Structure
and Listening Comprehension..................................................
6. The Contribution of Students’ Achievement in Generic
Structure in their Listening Comprehension............................
7. Hypothesisi Testing.................................................................
B. Disccusions...................................................................................
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
A. The Conclusions............................................................................

B. The Suggestions............................................................................
REFERENCES
APPENDICES

32
32
33
33
34
34
35
36
36
39
40

LIST OF TABLES
Tables
Page
1. Specification of Listening........................................................................ 27

2. Specification of Recount, Narrative,
and Procedure Generic Structure..... ........................................................ 27
3. Value of Pearson Product Moment Correlation....................................... 34
4. Value of Regression.................................................................................. 35

LIST OF THE APPENDICES
Appendix
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.


Result of students listening comprehension test at class X2
Result of students generic structure test at class X2
Distribution of listening test
Distribution of generic structure test
The students’ listening test
The students’ generic structure test
The reliability calculation of listening test
The realibility calculation of generic structure test
Pearson product moment correlation
SPSS product moment correlation
SPSS regression table
Descriptive statistics of the tests

MOTTO
I am precious in God’s sight.(Isaiah 43:4)
Do your best and God will do the rest.

ADMITTED BY

1. Examination Committee

Chairperson

: Drs. Hery Yufrizal, M.A., Ph.D.

...........................

Examiner

: Dra. Hartati Hasan, M.Hum.

............................

Secretary

: Drs. Ramlan Ginting Suka

............................

2. The Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty


Dr. H. Bujang Rahman, M.Si.
NIP 19600315 198503 1 003

Graduated on : March 30th, 2012

DEDICATION
This script is dedicated to:
 My beloved father and mother
Who had never stop praying and trying to give the best
for their beloved children. I love you.
 My beloved sister and brother
Wulandari, S.P. and Anung Suwito
Hope we can make our parents proud. Thank you for everything.
 My great friends in 2007 English Department
Keep spirit and keep smile guys!!!
 My teachers and lectures
Thank you for the knowledge and sciences.
 My Almamater

Research Title


: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’
ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND
THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE
FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

Student’s Name

: Sih Kadarwati

Student’s Number

: 0713042045

Departmnet

: Language and Arts Education

Study Program

: English Education

Faculty

: Teacher Training and Education

APPROVED BY
Advisory Committee
Advisor

Co-Advisor

Drs. Hery Yufrizal, M.A., Ph.D.
NIP 19600719 198511 1 001

Drs. Ramlan Ginting Suka
NIP 19570721 198603 1 003

The Head of
Language and Arts Education Department

Drs. Imam Rejana, M.Si.
NIP 19480421 197803 1 004

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Praise to the Jesus Christ, the Almighty the King of creation, who always gives
me all the best of this life and there is no doubt about it. This paper is presented to
fulfill one of the requirements in accomplishing the S-1 Degree at the Department
of Language and Arts of Teachers Training and Education Faculty in the
University of Lampung.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to:
1.

Drs. Hery Yufrizal, M.A., Ph.D. as my advisor; words are not enough to show
how much I thank you for everything you’ve given me.

2.

Drs. Ramlan Ginting Suka as my co-advisor, thank you for the kindness.

3.

Dra. Hartati Hasan, M.Hum. as my examiner; thank you for your suggestions
and guidance that lead me as a good writer.

4.

Dr. Muhammad Sukirlan, M.A. as my additional advisor, thank you for the
teories and time in leading me to be a good scientific paper writer.

5.

Drs. Huzairin, M.Pd. as my academic advisor; I’m sorry if I never ask you for
your advices, but I’m very thankful for your kindness.

6.

All of the lecturers of the English Study Program of Teacher Training and
Education Faculty of Lampung University who have given great knowledge
during my study.

7.

Prof. Dr. Cucu Sutarsyah, M.A. as the Head of English study program.

8.

Drs. Imam Rejana, M.Si. as the Head of Language and Arts Education
Department.

9.

Drs. Soegiarto for providing the opportunity to conduct the research.

10. Triasi Limbong, S.Pd. as the English teacher of X2, who have given
permission to conduct the research at SMAN 5 Bandar Lampung.
11. The students of X2 for being so cooperative during the research.
12. My beloved parents, Drs. Marsudi and Suharti, S.Pd. for their willingness to
wait for my graduation. Thank you for your prays and moneys.
13. Wulandari, S.P.; the sister and the friend of mine. You always give me
advices that make me more mature in thinking and action. Thank you sist.
14. Anung Suwito; the little brother actualy but be my big brother. I love you.
15. The carzy gangs of English 2007 generation, aka NERD (Mbak Lilis, Ganis,
Nurul, Diah, Dellia Astuti, S.Pd., Yulia Helwana, S.Pd., Ike Epridiana, S.Pd.,
Veronika Niki, S.Pd., Sisil, Lala, Ayu, Dini, Mei, Fevi, Endah, Esy, Umi,
Siti, Delia E, Rini, Fetris, Reni, Aprita, Rudy, Rio, Hadi, Deri, Dion, Joko,
Dauy, Dicky, Dian, Zie, Ratih Nurmala, S.Pd., Tiwi, Ferry, Asti, Cia, Egra,
Astiti, Wayan, Rizka, Ervina, Rahmad, Desti, Silka, Nyimas, Akhirman(alm).
Thanks for the good times and bad times we’ve experienced. I’ll never forget
those memories for the rest of my life.
16. Many thanks to these names who give me support, attention, helps,
happiness, and entertainments: my laptop (RIP), my new notebook, Perkantas
Lampung crew (Kak Ester, Dedy, Miss Yanti, Kak Duma, Mbak Yulia, Kak
Clara, Mas Adi, Erni, Wiwin, Mia, Julius, Elsye, Gideon, Gilang, Iyut),
POMK FKIP crew (Andin, Cucun, Eli, Leni, Kak Tina), Via Dolorosa (Kak

Ida, Justina, Liwarni, Okta, Maike), PLB (Ina, Dewi, Resta), Jesus
Worshipers (Riana and Dian), RCK crew (Kak Lia, Ci Ika, Mbak Sri, Mbak
Wati, Mbak Dewi), My private students (Wayan, Nora, Yosy), Piers (Yeni,
Rindi, Kak Ika, Kak Nindya, Sari, ect), -thank you, the webs (Google-YahooYoutube, Facebook).
17. My friend in struggel Siti Maisaroh, S.Pd. Keep fighting jeng.
18. Pak Paliman, Bu Ratna and Bu Sures: thank you so much for your help.
19. My hamster, Stevie and the kids for being my secret keeper and colored my
life.

Finally, the writer be glad to receive comments and suggestions for the
improvement of this script. The writer hopes this script will be useful for all
readers.

Bandar Lampung, 10 Maret 2012
The writer

Sih Kadarwati

REFFERENCES
Alexander, L. G. 1967. Practice and Progress. New York: Longman, Inc.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.
Jakarta: Bina Aksara
Bull, Victoria. 2010. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Coolidge, Frederick L. 2000. Statistics: A Gentle Introduction. London: SAGE
publications.

Derewianka, Beverly. 1990. Exploring How Texts Work. Australia: Primary
English Teaching Association.
Fenrianti, Lestia. 2007. Improving Students’ Narrative Writing Skill Through
Generic Structure Pratice at The First Year Students of SMAN 1 Bandar
Lampung. Bandar Lampung: University of Lampung.
Gerot, Linda and Wignell, Peter. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar.
Sydney: Gerd.

Griffee, D. T. 1986. Listen and Act. From Simple Actions to Classroom Drama.
English Teaching Forum 24/2, 18-23.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: University Park
Press.
Halliday, M. A. K and Hasan, R. 1989. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of
Language in a Socialsemiotic Perspective. London: Oxford University Press.
Hatch, E. and Farhady, H. 1982. Research Design and Statistic for Applied
Linguistic. London: New Burry House, Inc.
Heaton, J. B. 1991. Writing English Language Tests. Longman Group ltd.

Henning, J. H. 1966. Improving Oral Communication. New York: Mc Graw
Hill,Inc.
Hornby, Peter A. 1977. Bilingualism Psychological, Social and Educational
Implications. New York: Academic Press.
Howatt, A. and Dakin, J. 1999. Teaching Listening. Saricoban. Retrieved from
http://www.teaching listening.com.
Huerberner, Theodore. 1959. How to Teach Foreign Language Effectively. New
York: New York University Press.
Larson and Longacre. 1983. What is a Narrative Text.Retrieved from
http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsANarrative
Text.htm
Lukong, Nicholas N. 1988. Teaching Listening Comprehension. English
Teaching Forum Volume XXVI.
Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text–Systems and Structure. Philadelphia/Amsterdam:
John Benjamins.
Mc.Intosh, Celcia-Nurcia. 1979. Teaching Foreign Language Skills.
London: Oxfords University Press.
Morley, Joan. 1976. On Developing Listening Comprehension and
Complementary Activities. Toronto.
Procter, Paul. 1978. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. London:
Longman Group ltd.
Rost, Michael. 2002. Teaching and Researching Listening. London: Longman
Group ltd.
Sari, Kartika. 2010. Increasing Students’ Listening Comprehension of Narrative
Text through Plot of Grade IX of MTs Nurul Ulum Kotagajah. Bandar
Lampung: University of Lampung.
Septriana, Rengga Santi. 2008. The Effect of Metacognitive Learning Strategy
Training Toward Students’ Achievement in Listening Comprehension. Bandar
Lampung: University of Lampung.

Setiyadi, Ag. B. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing.
Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Shohamy, E. 1985. A Practical Handbook in Language Testing for the Second
Language Teacher. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
Sudarwati, Th. M. and Grace, Eudia. 2007. Look Ahead an English Course for
Senior High School Students Year X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Swift, S. 2007. An ELT Notebook.
http://elnotebook.blogspot.com/index.html.
Umi, U.M. 2004. An Analysis of Teaching Listening Process through Song at the
Second Year of SD Al-Kausar Bandar Lampung (unpublished scrip).
Bandar Lampung: University of Lampung.
Underwood, M. 1985. Teaching Listening. New York: Longman. Inc.
Universitas Lampung. 2006. Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Lampung:
Lampung University Press.
Wills, Robin. An Investigation of Factors Influencing English Listening
Comprehension and Possible Measures for Improvement. University of
Tasmania, Australia.
Wilt, Miriam E. A Study of Teacher Awareness of Listening as a Factor in
Elementary Education,Journal of Educational Research, 43 (8), April 1950, pp.
626-6.

Dokumen yang terkait

The Correlation between students' motivation and their English listening achievement : (correlational study at eleventh grade of SMAN 3 Tegal)

0 7 53

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS‘ ACHIEVEMENT IN GENERIC STRUCTURE AND THEIR LISTENING COMPREHENSION AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 13 34

THE USE OF VIDEO MOVIE TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS’ OF SMAN 1 NATAR LAMPUNG SELATAN

1 8 51

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SCHEMATA AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN MAKING SENSE OF NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMAN 2 KOTABUMI

0 9 51

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ FREQUENCY OF LISTENING ENGLISH SONG AND THEIR VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 30 72

THE EFFECT OF STUDENTS SELF-ESTEEM ON THEIR REDING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 17 54

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ GRAMMAR MASTERY AND VOCABULARY MASTERY AND THEIR READING ABILITY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 28 83

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ VERBAL IQ AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION ( The case of the third year students of MAN 3 Sragen in the academic year 2002/2003 ) - Test Repository

0 0 107

A STUDY OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

0 2 15

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE MOTIVATION OF THE FIRST- YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA IN SURABAYA IN LEARNING ENGLISH AND THEIR ENGLISH ACHIEVEMENT

0 0 13