7
PART 2. THE CONCEPT OF  FINANCIAL O‘ MATE‘IAL BENEFIT
WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF MIGRANT SMUGGLING
This  Part  of  the  Issue  Paper  considers  the fi a ial  o   othe   ate ial  e efit
FoMB concept from the perspective of international law and policy: what does the drafting history of the Smuggling of Migrants Protocol
– and most particularly of the definition of migrant smuggling
– tell us about the intention of States with regard to conduct they wished to include and exclude? To what extent do materials including
the travaux  préparatoires
19
shed  light  on  the  scope  and  substantive  content  of  the FoMB  concept  as  it  is  used  in  the  Protocol?  What  information  on  the
implementation  of  the  concept  is  provided  by  secondary  sources  of  guidance  and insights from regional law, policy and practice?
2.1. Drafting history of the Smuggling of Migrants Protocol and its definition
A  brief  overview  of  the  evolution  of  the  definition  of  migrant  smuggling  provides i po ta t i sight i to ho  “tates  u de sta di g of the phe o e o  de eloped a d
coalesced.  Much  like  earlier  United  Nations  reports  and  resolutions,  the  first negotiating  text  submitted  by  Austria  and  Italy  in  early  1999  makes  reference  to
ultiple  o epts,  i ludi g  illegal  t affi ki g   a d  t a spo t  of ig a ts,
especially  by  sea .  It  i ludes  the  follo i g  defi itio   of  illegal  t affi ki g  a d
smuggling of ig a ts :
Any person who intentionally procures, for his or her profit, repeatedly and in an  organized  manner,  the  illegal  entry  of  a  person  into  another  State  of
which  the  latter  person  is  not  a  national  or  not  a  permanent  resident commits  the  offence  of  illegal  trafficking  and transport  of  migrants   within
the meaning of this Protocol.
20
Concurrent  discussions  by  the  drafting  committee  around  the  development  of  a protocol  on  trafficking  in  persons  helped  to  affirm  a  distinction  between  the
concepts of human trafficking and migrant smuggling.
21
This distinction was already reflected in the second draft of the Smuggling of Migrants Protocol, which omits any
efe e e  to  illegal  t affi ki g   i   fa o   of  the  e   o ept  of  s uggli g  of migrants
.  At  that  poi t  it  as  p oposed  that  the  te   e  defi ed  as:  the
19
Travaux préparatoires of the negotiations for the elaboration of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto.
20
D aft ele e ts fo  a  i te atio al legal i st u e t agai st illegal t affi ki g a d t a spo t of migrants Proposal submitted
Aust ia a d Ital ,  UN Do . AAC. Add. , De .  ,
, at A t. A. Emphasis added.
21
See, for example, Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational O ga ized C i e,  D aft P oto ol agai st the “ uggli g of Mig a ts   Land, Air and Sea,
“upple e ti g the U ited Natio s Co e tio  agai st T a s atio al O ga ized C i e, UN Doc. AAC.2544Add.1Rev.1
, Ma   , , at  ote    The te   s uggli g  is used
throughout the text in the light of action taken by the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice at its eighth session regarding the draft Protocol Addressing Trafficking in Women and
Child e . .