Administering Test of normal Distribution Testing the Homogeneity of Variance Hypothesis Test

t = 2 1 2 1 1n 1n s X X   S 2 =     2 n n S 1 n S 1 n 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1      1 X = Mean of the control class. 2 X = Mean of the experimental class. S = Standard deviation. n 1 = The number of students in the experimental class. N 2 = The number of students in the control class. The criterion are: The null hypothesis H o is accepted if t-ratio is t-table. The null hypothesis H i is rejected if t-ration is t-table. H o = There is no significant difference achievement between the students who are taught through Direct Method and those who are taught through Silent Way. H i = There is significant difference achievement between the students who are taught through Direct Method and those who are taught through Silent Way. Hatch and Farhadv. 1982:111 .

V. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

In this chapter, the writer comes to the conclusion and suggestions of this research. In the conclusion, the writer divides two points of view, while for suggestion the writer gives there points of view.

5.1 Conclusion

Based on the result of analysis and computation of the data and also the discussion of the findings, the researcher concluded as follow: 1. There is no significant difference of the students’ vocabulary achievement between the students who are taught through direct method and those who are taught trough silent way. It means that the second hypothesis proposed by writer is proved. It is because teaching vocabulary through direct method gives more chances for the students to be involved much in teaching learning process, so that the students understand more about material taught and thus they can get better achievement. 2. Teaching vocabulary concrete noun through direct method is effective than through silent way, because direct method can capture the students’ motivation and interest. In contrast, teaching vocabulary through silent way only let the students memorize the vocabulary. It is known from the average score of the post test. It implies that the second hypothesis proposed by the writer is accepted.

5.2 Suggestion

After conducting the research, the researcher proposes some suggestion refer to the application of the two techniques in teaching vocabulary concrete noun at elementary school. They are: 1. Considering that vocabulary is very important for learners in learning a language English, it is suggested to English teacher to used direct method in teaching vocabulary, because can attract the students’ motivation to learn. It also suggest that English teacher use silent way when they face a brief materials. 2. English teacher at elementary school should be careful in selecting the materials. It means that the teacher should select and teach the materials to the students begin with the things or objects close to them and they can see in daily life. 3. Teaching vocabulary at elementary school, the teacher should present the materials according to its category. For example, at the first meeting teacher only teaches vocabulary refer to things in the classroom, the second meeting refer to things in the house and so on. It is aimed no to make the students confused.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SDN 6 METRO PUSAT KOTA METRO

0 8 37

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH ROLE PLAY AND THOSE THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUES

1 13 64

VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE DIRECT METHOD AND THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH SILENT WAY AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 PISANG PENENGAHAN LAMPUNG SELATAN

0 12 51

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS READING ACHIEVMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA'ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 8 46

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF NARRATIVE TEXT BETWEEN STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZER AND THROUGH LITERAL TRANSLATION AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 1 NATAR

2 8 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH STORY TELLING AND THOSE THROUGH STORY TELLING WITH SERIAL PICTURES AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMAN 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 16 53