Identification of the Problem Limitation of the Problem

or boring if exposed to it at school, and yet a minority is fascinated by it: a field in which precise scholarship and nit-picking pedantry have co-existed for centuries. Grammar is concerned with how sentences and utterances are formed. In a typical English sentence, it can be seen the two most basic principles of grammar, the arrangement of items syntax and the structure of items morphology : I gave my sister a sweater for her birthday. The meaning of this sentence is obviously created by words such as gave, sister, sweater and birthday. But there are other words I, my, a, for, her which contribute to the meaning, and, additionally, aspects of individual words and the way they are arranged which enable people to interpret what the sentence means Carter and McCarthy, 2006. In accordance with the concepts of grammar stated by the experts above, it can be said that grammar is the key of a language which consists of two basic principles which are syntax and morphology. According to Chomsky 1971, syntax is the study of the principles and processes by which sentences are constructed in particular languages. Syntactic investigation of a given language has as its goal the construction of a grammar that can be viewed as a device of some sort for producing the sentences of the language under analysis. In other words, syntax should be based on some analysis Radford says that within traditional grammar, the syntax of a language is described in terms of a taxonomy i.e. the classificatory list of the range of different types of syntactic structures found in the language. The central assumption underpinning syntactic analysis in traditional grammar is that phrases and sentences are built up of a series of constituents i.e. syntactic units, each of which belongs to a specific grammatical category and serves a specific grammatical function. Given this assumption, the task of the linguist analysing the syntactic structure of any given type of sentence is to identify each of the constituents in the sentence, and for each constituent to say what category it belongs to and what function it serves as different sentences have different structure. In contrast to the taxonomic approach adopted in traditional grammar, Chomsky 1971 takes a cognitive approach to the study of grammar. For Chomsky, the goal of the linguist is to determine what it is that native speakers know about their native language which enables them to speak and understand the language fluently: hence, the study of language is part of the wider study of cognition i.e. what human beings know. In a fairly obvious sense, any native speaker of a language can be said to know the grammar of his or her native language.

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING SIMPLE PAST TENSE TAUGHT THROUGH GROUP WORK AND TAUGHT THROUGH INDIVIDUAL STUDY

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LEARNING SIMPLE PAST TENSE TAUGHT THROUGH GROUP WORK AND TAUGHT THROUGH INDIVIDUAL STUDY

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY CONCERNING STUDENTS’ PAST TENSE MASTERY BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE METHODS AT THE FIRST YEAR CLASS OF SMPN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 5 134

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PREPOSITION OF PLACE TAUGHT THROUGH REALIA AND TAUGHT THROUGH PICTURES AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMPN 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 27

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN STUDENTS TAUGHT THROUGH COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING AND TAUGHT THROUGH SELF-QUESTIONING STRATEGY AT THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 89 211

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH VIDEO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH AUDIO IN SMPN 26 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 26 59

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH STORY TELLING AND THOSE THROUGH STORY TELLING WITH SERIAL PICTURES AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMAN 1 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 16 53