commit to user
1 The interview schedule. The researcher made an
appointment to the interviewer. 2
Interviewing the teacher. The researcher asked the teacher to see and to observe the way she implemented
Cooperative Language Learning CLL to teach speaking skill
and to improve students’ motivation. After that, the researcher asked to the teacher for her reaction and her
comment at that point. 3
Interviewing students. The researcher implemented Cooperative Language Learning CLL to teach speaking
skill and to attract students’ motivation in each meeting for
two cycles. The r esearcher asked students’ about their
feeling, their comment, and their reaction before and after the implementation.
3. Test
The researcher also gave speaking test in the end of every cycle. The test was about giving their opinion of a picture of tourist resort that has been
provided. The score was involved their accuracy and fluency. The result is us
ed to find the improvement of the students’ speaking skill.
I. The Technique of Analyzing Data
To analyze the data, the researcher used qualitative and quantitative technique.
1. Qualitative
The researcher analyzed the data of implementation cooperative language learning inn teaching speaking skill through
observation, field notes, interview, and photographs.
commit to user
According to McKernan 1996 in Burns 1999: 156-160 there
are five steps in analyzing the data. They are:
a. Assembling the data
The first step is to assemble the data that the researcher has collected over the period of the research: field notes, interview,
and so on. At this step, broad patterns should begin to show up which can be compared and contrasted to see what fits together.
b. Coding the data
Coding is a process of attempting to reduce the large amount of data that may be collected to more manageable
categories of concepts, themes, or types. Data analysis become more messy and coding becomes less clear cut when the researcher
dealing with diary entries, classroom recording, or open-ended survey questions.
c. Comparing the data
Comparison is made to see whether themes or patterns are repeated or developed across different data gathering techniques.
At this step, the researcher is able to map frequencies of occurrences, behaviors or responses. The main aim at this step is to
describe and display the data rather than to interpret or explain them.
d. Building interpretations
This is the point where the researcher moves beyond describing, categorizing, coding, and comparing to make some
sense of the meaning of the data. e.
Reporting the outcomes At this step, it involves presenting an account of the
research for others.
commit to user
N x
x
N y
y
2. Quantitative
