TINJAUAN PUSTAKA

528 Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), Vol. 5, No. 5, Oktober 2018, hlm. 517-530

pemerintahan yaitu pusat komputer kementerian hasil implementasi tata kelola pada sebuah departemen luar negeri di indonesia. Hasil analisis

organisasi.

kondisi 26 proses dalam siklus ITIL dan pengukuran tingkat capability dari 18 Proses TI dalam COBIT

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

dan hubungannya dengan layanan TI. Memberikan rekomendasi KPI(Ekanata & Girsang, 2015).

AGUILLAR, D. A. M., MURAKAMI, I., JUNIOR, Sedangkan (Shalannanda & Hakimi, 2016), menguji

P. M., & JR., P. T. A. 2017. IT Governance kombinasi dari kedua metode tersebut pada rumah

Program and Improvements in Brazilian Small sakit. Hasil menunjukkan beberapa deliverable yang

Business: Viability and Case Study, 11(1), seharusnya digunakan sebagaidasar-dasar jika Tata

961 –964. https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F410 Kelola TI dalam suatu organisasi, seperti: Kerangka

ALI, S., GREEN, P., & ROBB, A. 2015. Kerja Tata Kelola TI, Struktur Organisasi TI,

technology investment Struktur Tata Kelola TI, dan Koordinator Tata

Information

governance: What is it and does it matter? Kelola Sistem Informasi. Peluang penelitian

Journal of Accounting selanjutnya dapat menguji coba dan mengeksplorasi

International

1 –25. model konseptual pada studi kasus lainnya.

Information

Systems, 18,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2015.04.002 Sedangkan penelitian (Lapihu & Isnanto,

ALREEMY, Z., CHANG, V., WALTERS, R., & 2017), menggunakan COBIT 5.0, ITBSC pada studi

WILLS, G. 2016. Critical success factors kasus di pemerintahan Kotamadya Kupang. Hasil

(CSFs) for information technology governance menunjukkan

(ITG). International Journal of Information Kotamadya Kupang berada di posisi 0 (proses tidak

36(6), 907 –916. lengkap) dengan target tingkat kematangan 3.

Management,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.01 Sehingga, Tata kelola TI kotamadya Kupang tidak

dalam kondisi maksimal untuk menanggapi bisnis BERMEJO, P. H. DE S., TONELLI, A. O., proses. Peneltiian selanjutnya dapat membuat

ZAMBALDE, A. L., SANTOS, P. A. DOS, & rencana strategi kontekstual dari implementasi tata

ZUPPO, L. 2014. Evaluating IT Governance kelola TI.

Practices and Business and IT Outcomes: A quantitative Exploratory Study in Brazilian

6. KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN PENELITIAN

Companies. Procedia Technology, 16, 849 – Tata kelola TI telah menjadi topik yang

menarik karena pentingnya peran tata kelola TI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.035 tersebut dalam sebuah organisasi. Ketertarikan

BIANCHI, I. S., SOUSA, R. D., PEREIRA, R., & organisasi ataupun perusahaan terhadap tata kelola

LUCIANO, E. 2017. IT Governance TI semakin berkembang karena telah berubahnya

Structures in Brazilian, Dutch and Portuguese peran dan relevansi TI dalam organisasi. Terdapat

Universities. Procedia Computer Science, 121,

34 paper yang menjadi acuan untuk ulasan literatur

ini.Penelitian yang berbasis survey atau kuisioner https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.120 lebih banyak dan pembahasan tata kelola TI secara

BIN-ABBAS, H., & BAKRY, S. H. 2014. luas diterapkan pada organisasi bisnis. Berdasarkan

Assessment of IT governance in organizations: metode

A simple integrated approach. Computers in dikembangkan dari topik penelitian tata kelola TI

ataupun konseptual

model

yang

Behavior, 32, 261 –267. menggunakan berbagai macam metode dan

Human

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.019 kombinasi dari beberapa metode. Paling banyak

ditemukan penggunaan metode COBIT. Selain itu, CHI, M., ZHAO, J., GEORGE, J. F., LI, Y., & metode kombinasi antara COBIT, ITIL, ITBSC,

ZHAI, S. 2017. The influence of inter-firm IT SCRUM, VAL IT, dan sebagainya.

strategies on relational Dari 34 paper tersebut disintesis menjadi 5

governance

performance: The moderation effect of penelitian yaitu cloud computing governance,

technology ambidexterity. criteria success factor IT governance, penerapan dan

information

Journal of Information atau evaluasi tata kelola dengan berbagai metode

International

43 –53. pada sektor bisnis, tata kelola TI pada Universitas,

Management,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.00 peran tata kelola dalam pemerintahan dan rumah

EKANATA, A., & GIRSANG, A. S. 2015. berdasarkan future dan limitasi dari masing-masing

sakit. Peluang penelitian

direkomendasikan

Assessment of Capability Level and IT paper yang dibahas. Hambatan ataupun tantangan

Governance Improvement Based on COBIT untuk penelitian di masa depan adalah pengukuran

and ITIL Framework at Communication ataupun evaluasi tata kelola seharusnya dilakukan

Center Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2015, 1 –6. secara berkala dan berkelanjutan, sehingga

FAZLIDA, M. R., & SAID, J. 2015. Information membutuhkan waktu yang lama untuk mengetahui

Security:

Governance and Implementation Setback. Procedia Economics

Risk,

Nina Fadilah Najwa, dkk, Kajian dan Peluang Penelitian Tata Kelola … 529

and Finance,

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01106- KOSALA, D. R. 2017. Benefits to Implementing IT

5 Governance in Higher Education, (November), GUETAT, S. B. A., & DAKHLI, S. B. D. 2015. The

Architecture Facet

KOSASI, S. 2017. Maturity Levels of Academic Governance: The Case of Urbanized

of

Information

Information Services of Higher Education Information Systems. Procedia Computer

Using IT Governance. 4th International Science,

COnference on New Media Studies, 56 –61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.564

KOSASI, S., VEDYANTO, & YULIANI, I. D. A. HARMER, G. 2013. Governance of Enterprise IT

E. 2017. Enhancing online business marketing Based on COBIT 5. United Kingdom: IT

to expand market shares through it Governance Publishing.

governance. International Conference on IBRAHIM, & NURPULAELA, L. 2017. Evaluation

Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and of IT governance to support IT operation

Informatics (EECSI), 4(September), 319 –323. excellent based on COBIT 4.1 at the PT Timah

https://doi.org/10.11591/eecsi.4.1037 Tbk. Proceedings - 2016 3rd International

LAPIHU, D., & ISNANTO, R. R. 2017. IT Conference on Information Technology,

Governance in Public Organization Based on Computer,

and Electrical Engineering, ITBSC and Cobit 5. In 1st International ICITACEE

Conference on Informatics and Computational https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITACEE.2016.7892

Sciences (ICICoS) (pp. 83 –88). 467

LI, H. J., CHANG, S. I., & YEN, D. C. 2017. ISACA. 2013. COBIT 5 For Risk. ISACA.

Investigating CSFs for the life cycle of ERP JAIRAK, K., & PRANEETPOLGRANG, P. 2013.

system from the perspective of IT governance. Applying IT governance balanced scorecard

Computer Standards and Interfaces, 50, 269 – and importance-performance analysis for

279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.10.013 providing IT

LIN, C., & WITTMER, J. L. S. 2017. Proactive university. Information Management &

governance strategy

in

information security behavior and individual Computer

creativity: Effects of group culture and https://doi.org/10.1108/IMCS-08-2012-0036

decentralized IT governance. 2017 IEEE JAIRAK, K., PRANEETPOLGRANG, P., &

International Conference on Intelligence and SUBSERMSRI,

Security Informatics: Security and Big Data, technology governance practices based on

1 –6. sufficiency economy philosophy in The Thai

ISI

https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2017.8004865 University Sector. Information Technology &

LUNARDI, G. L., BECKER, J. L., MAÇADA, A. People,

C. G., & DOLCI, P. C. 2014. The impact of https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2013-0188

adopting IT governance on financial JOSHI, A., BOLLEN, L., HASSINK, H., DE HAES,

performance: An empirical analysis among S., & VAN GREMBERGEN, W. 2018.

Brazilian firms. International Journal of Explaining IT governance disclosure through

Accounting Information Systems, 15(1), 66 – the constructs of IT governance maturity and

IT strategic role.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2013.02.001 Management,

Information

and

MANGALARAJ, G., SINGH, A, & TANEJA, A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.003

2014. IT Governance Frameworks and JUIZ, C., GÓMEZ, M., & BARCELÓ, M. I. 2012.

COBIT-A Literature Review. Twentieth Business / IT Projects Alignment through the

Americas Conference on Information Systems, Project Portfolio Approval Process as IT

1 –10. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2009.23.1.79 Governance Instrument. Procedia - Social and

NUROĞLU, H. H. 2016. Business Network Behavioral

Governance Structure and IT Capabilities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.093

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, KERR, D. S., & MURTHY, U. S. 2013. The

50 –59. importance of the CobiT framework IT

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.113 processes for effective internal control over

PARK, J., LEE, J. N., DANIEL LEE, O. K., & financial reporting in organizations: An

KOO, Y. 2017. Alignment between Internal international

and External IT Governance and Its Effects on Management,

Distinctive Firm Performance: An Extended https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.012

Resource-Based View. IEEE Transactions on KITCHENHAM. 2007. Guidelines for performing

Engineering Management, 64(3), 351 –364. Systematic Literature Reviews in Software

https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2017.2678485

530 Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK), Vol. 5, No. 5, Oktober 2018, hlm. 517-530

PRASAD, A., & GREEN, P. 2015. Governing cloud THOMPSON, S., EKMAN, P., SELBY, D., & computing services: Reconsideration of IT

WHITAKER, J. 2014. A model to support IT governance structures. International Journal of

infrastructure planning and the allocation of IT Accounting Information Systems, 19, 45 –58.

governance authority. Decision Support https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2015.11.004

59 (1), 108 –118. PRASAD, A., GREEN, P., & HEALES, J. 2014. On

Systems ,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.10.010 governance structures for the cloud computing

WIJAYA, S. F. 2017. Impact of IT governance services and assessing their effectiveness.

framework in post- implementation for ERP International

performance : Literature Review. The Information

International Conference on ICT for Smart https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2014.05.005

Society (ICISS) . https://doi.org/978-1-5386- PUTRI, M. A., AKNURANDA, I., & MAHMUDY,

2330-5

W. F. 2017. Maturity Evaluation of WILKIN, C. L., & CHENHALL, R. H. 2010. A Information Technology Governance in PT

Review of IT Governance: A Taxonomy to DEF Using Cobit 5 Framework. Journal of

Inform Accounting Information Systems. Information Technology and Computer

Journal of Information Systems , 24(2), 107 – Science,

146. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.107 https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.20172123

2(1),

19 –27.

WILKIN, C. L., COUCHMAN, P. K., SOHAL, A., REBOLLO, O., MELLADO, D., FERNÁNDEZ-

& ZUTSHI, A. 2016. Exploring differences MEDINA, E., & MOURATIDIS, H. 2015.

between smaller and large organizations’ Empirical evaluation of a cloud computing

governance of information information security governance framework.

corporate

International Journal of Information and Software Technology, 58, 44 –

technology.

Accounting Information Systems , 22, 6 –25.

57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.07.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.10.003

B. A. A., SANDFRENI, & ADIKARA, F. 2017. Capability

YUDATAMA,

U., NAZIEF,

HIDAYANTO, A. N., & MISHBAH, M. level assessment of IT governance in PTP

2017. Factors Affecting Awareness and Mitra Ogan: COBIT 5 framework for BAI 04

Attitude of IT Governance Implementation in process. 2017 4th International Conference on

The Higher Education Institution : A Computer Applications and Information

Literature Review. In 3rd International Processing Technology (CAIPT),

Conference on Science in Information https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIPT.2017.8320665

1 –5.

Technology (ICSITech) (pp. 588 –592). SHALANNANDA, W., & HAKIMI, R. 2016. IT

YUDATAMA, U., NAZIEF, B. A. A., & Governance Design for Hospital Management

HODAYANTO, A. N. 2017. Benefits and Information System. 10th International

Barriers as a Critical Success Factor in the Conference on Telecommunication Systems

Implementation of IT Governance : Literature Services and Applications (TSSA).

Review. In The International Conference on SIRISOMBOONSUK, P., GU, V. C., CAO, R. Q.,

ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) . & BURNS, J. R. 2018. Relationships between

project governance

and

information

technology governance and their impact on project performance. International Journal of Project

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.10.003 SMITS, D., & VAN HILLEGERSBERG, J. 2017.

The development of a hard and soft IT governance assessment instrument. Procedia Computer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.008 SPREMIC, M., & D, P. 2008. Emerging issues in IT

Governance : implementing the corporate IT risks management model. Wseas Transactions On Systems, 7(3), 219 –228.

SUICIMEZOV, N., & GEORGESCU, M. R. 2014. IT Governance in Cloud. Procedia Economics and

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00531-