Material and methods Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:J-a:Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology:Vol251.Issue2.Aug2000:

˚ U . Bamstedt, M.B. Martinussen J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 251 2000 1 –15 3 different momentary changes to new feeding intensities. The results will give guidelines in how to design and dimension digestion experiments and they also form a basis for a simple method to experimentally determine the digestion time, which is outlined here.

2. Material and methods

The scyphomedusa A . aurita was used as model organism because of its transparent body and ability to accept prey put directly into the stomach. Because of this, stomach content could be controlled without killing the animals and the ingestion rate could be precisely controlled through the frequency by which the animals were manually fed. Medusae used to study the long-term days and short-term h individual variability ˚ in digestion time were collected with a hand-held net in Vagsbøpollen, a semi-enclosed small bay near Raunefjorden, western Norway 608139N, 58169E, in June 1995. Data on the size of the 10 medusae over the experiment are presented in Table 1. Prey zooplankton were collected with a 180-mm WP2-net in vertical hauls from ca. 30 m to the surface. The material was brought to the laboratory in a 30-l container with seawater 21 and stage V copepodids Calanus finmarchicus average dry weight, 120 mg individual sorted out with a wide-mouthed pipette within 1 h. New, recently collected prey material was used for each experimental day days 1, 5 and 9, respectively. Medusae and prey were stored at 108C in a constant-temperature room prior to experiment. During each experimental day the digestion time of the medusae was measured at 3 times with 3 h between the measurements, starting the first experiment around 09.00 and the third one around 15.00. During these measurements medusae were kept on a cooling table 10628C in 300-ml glass bowls, and three stage V copepodids C . finmarchicus were put into the manubrium of the medusae with a pipette. The stomach content was checked in a Wild M5 dissection microscope every 10 min in the beginning and every second minute when stomach content began to disappear, keeping the medusae continuously in Table 1 Aurelia aurita; bell diameter and average predation rate of 10 individual medusae used in repeated digestion a experiments with the copepod Calanus finmarchiucus three individuals of stage V copepodids as prey 21 21 Medusa Bell diameter mm Pred. rate prey h ind. Day 1 Day 5 Day 9 Days 2–4 Days 6–8 A 43 39 38 1.06 1.60 B 34 30 31 0.89 1.15 C 42 33 30 0.86 0.68 D 38 32 34 0.63 1.00 E 42 36 37 0.86 0.92 F 41 35 40 0.75 1.18 G 36 36 31 0.54 0.72 H 37 32 32 0.69 0.85 I 41 40 34 1.29 1.14 J 40 40 41 0.88 1.00 a 21 The prey concentration during days 2–4 and 6–8 was 25 prey l . ˚ 4 U . Bamstedt, M.B. Martinussen J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 251 2000 1 –15 the bowls. Prey rejection only occurred a few times and then in connection with the mechanical feeding procedure. New prey was then added. We therefore never observed any lost prey in any of the experiments. The digestion time was defined as the time of complete disintegration of prey with no solid remains. After the third measurement of an experimental day each individual 21 medusa was transferred to an aerated 10-l aquarium with 25 fresh C . finmarchicus l as food, and kept in a constant-temperature room at 108C and darkness until the next experiment. The average predation rate was calculated for the two periods between digestion experiments as the reduction in prey number per unit time see Table 1. All medusae were healthy and active throughout the experiment and a thorough control after finished experiment indicated perfect condition of all 10 medusae. Ephyrae originating from a laboratory stock of polyps, were reared on a diet of Artemia nauplii and natural zooplankton to small medusae in the size range 12–70 mm diameter and used in experiments where the ingestion rate was either constant or changed in a pre-defined manner see Table 2. The medusae were used in the experiments when attaining an average diameter between 21 and 56 mm Table 2. The medusae were kept individually in 300-ml glass bowls on a cooling table at 108C as described above. The remaining visible prey in the stomach of the medusae were counted under a stereomicroscope immediately before new prey were added, and without taking them away from the bowl. Remains in the stomach that could be identified as a prey was recorded as a present prey, even though it could be almost completely digested. One problem in displaying the results from such records then is that the continuous digestion is not reflected properly, and the plots give an impression of a discontinuous process. This will be most obvious during a low feeding intensity, when there will be few prey in the stomach, and where individual differences of only 61 prey in the stomach content may change the calculated digestion time to double or half. However, this has no implication for the precision in the experimental method described in the paper, where only end-point measurements are used. Table 2 a Aurelia aurita; experimental design and biometric data for medusae used in predefined ingestion schedules Exp. Ingestion schedule Diameter Wet wt. Dry wt. AFDW 21 Time h Prey h range mm mg mg mg 1 510 110 21–28 0.9960.35 40.5614.1 32.2610.8 2 510 210 37–51 4.0961.14 1856149 123638.5 3 510 410 27–33 1.6360.33 67.0611.6 51.069.3 4 510 810 40–46 4.1360.83 164634.7 126625.1 5 213 114 14–32 1.3061.19 55.1651.1 37.7637.3 6 213 411 12–27 0.9560.50 40.6622.8 27.7615.9 7 213 218 22–39 2.0360.81 81.4640.3 56.0630.4 8 213 812 30–48 2.6061.54 109664.5 79.1647.9 9 414 114 48–50 7.8960.96 333643.2 242629.0 10 414 411 44–61 8.5562.74 3646116 263683.0 11 414 218 47–57 8.7362.08 368695.9 266664.9 12 414 812 45–70 10.7264.34 4426169 3326138 a Each experiment comprised five individuals. ˚ U . Bamstedt, M.B. Martinussen J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 251 2000 1 –15 5 Direct measurements of the digestion time of C . finmarchicus fed with 1, 2, 4 or 8 prey was done on separate medusae in the size range 16–51 mm diameter n 5 6 or 8 medusae per meal size, using the same technique as described above.

3. Results