Capital expenditures continued SIGNIFICANT COMMITMENTS AND AGREEMENTS continued

PERUSAHAAN PERSEROAN PERSERO PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA Tbk AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As of December 31, 2014 and for the Year Then Ended Figures in tables are expressedin billions of Rupiah, unless otherwise stated 116

41. SIGNIFICANT COMMITMENTS AND AGREEMENTS continued c. Others continued

vi Trademark License Agreement On June 23, 2014, TII signed an agreement with Mobile Telecommunication Company Zain Saudi Arabia for the telecommunications product and service trademark license agreement over a 5-year term has elapsed from the effective date. Subsequently, on November 7, 2014, TII signed an agreement with Al Lama Group for distributions and sales of SIM Card and exploration of other business opportunities in Saudi Arabia.

42. CONTINGENCIES

In the ordinary course of business, the Group has been named as defendants in various legal actions in relation with land disputes, monopolistic practice and unfair business competition and SMS cartel practices. Based on managements estimate of the probable outcomes of these matters, the Group has recognized provision for losses amounting to Rp25 billion as of December 31, 2014. a. The Company, Telkomsel and seven other local operators are being investigated by The Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition “Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha” or “KPPU” for allegations of SMS cartel practices. As a result of the investigations on June 17, 2008, KPPU found that the Company, Telkomsel and certain other local operators had violated Law No. 5 year 1999 article 5 and charged the Company and Telkomsel penalty in the amounts of Rp18 billion and Rp25 billion, respectively. Management believes that there are no such cartel practices that led to a breach of prevailing regulations. Accordingly, the Company and Telkomsel filed an appeal with the Bandung District Court and South Jakarta District Court on July 14, 2008 and July 11, 2008, respectively. Due to the filing of case by operators in various courts, the KPPU subsequently requested the Supreme Court SC to consolidate the cases into the Central Jakarta District Court. Based on the SC’s decision letter dated April 12, 2011, the SC appointed the Central Jakarta District Court to investigate and resolve the case. As of the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements, there has not been any notification on the case from the court. b. The Company is a defendant in a case filed in Makassar District Court by Andi Jindar Pakki and his affiliates over a land property on Jl. A.P. Pettarani. On May 8, 2013, the court pronounced its verdict and ordered the Company to pay fair compensation or to vacate and surrender the disputed land to the plaintiffs. On May 20, 2013, the Company filed an appeal to the Makassar High Court, objecting to the District Court’s ruling. In December 2013, the Makassar High Court pronounced its verdict that is favorable to the plaintiffs and the Company filed an appeal to the SC. In January 2015, the Company received the SC Notice regarding the case Note 47a.