12
– such as portfolios, written assessments and interviews as required by each Certiication Level. Candidates do not receive scores for these
instruments, only the individual competences receive scores, according to
the evidence revealed by the use of each instrument. In other words, it doesn’t matter if you prove your competence through the portfolio or the interview. The scoring is on evidence provided for the competences
through all the instruments. Each competence is usually allocated a weighting of either 2 or 4 points to relect overall importance in the
full assessment scheme. The exception is for the four main competences under CA7 Leadership, Ethics and
Innovation, which at Levels 2 and 3 are weighted at 8 each to relect the particular importance of these at these levels. Competences assigned a weight of 4, can be scored from 0-4including ½ points while those
assigned a weight of 2, can be scored from 0-2. The competences given a weighting of 8 can be scored from
0-8. Again, candidates do not need experience in every competence. The candidate’s overall score is based on the tally of all competence scores.
To receive certiication, candidates must score a minimum of 70 overall and at least 60within each of the seven competence areas.
© WIOMSA
L 101 Candidates in Group Photo, Tsitsikamma Marine Park, South Africa, 2010.
3.1 Governance Structure
Five groups share in different governance aspects of the WIO-COMPAS Program. Certiication Bodies. The WIOMSA Board serves as the legal entity to the WIO-COMPAS Program. The
WIOMSA Board and the Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island CRCURI serve as
the co-certiication bodies. The Board also provides technical oversight, guidance, credibility, promotion and fundraising for the Program as a whole.
Advisors — Partner organisations provide guidance and feedback to the certifying bodies on how to maintain
rigor, decentralize the Program and identify opportunities for certiication offerings. The committee is comprised of regional and international capacity-building institutions.
Program Secretariat — WIOMSA has dedicated staff who serve as the Secretariat for WIO-COMPAS. Their role is to provide coordination and day-to-day operations and act as a hub for assessors. The Secretariat
and local partners manages all logistics and marketing of the certiication offerings. CRCURI assists the Secretariat in developing their capacity and procedures through back ofice support, Program development
and delivery, as well as providing technical support to the Program as a whole. Assessors — Assessors acting as independent experts, are responsible for evaluating each candidate’s
competences through a process that includes application interviews, mentoring candidates through their portfolio and reports, conducting the assessment event and providing recommendations to the Board for
certiication of successful candidates. Assessors conduct the assessment activities only. MPA management organizations — The MPA management organizations, both government and non-
governmental, play a key role in promoting the Program, encouraging staff to apply, endorsing the application
of individual candidates, conirming validity of application materials, facilitating the case study process, verifying portfolios and most importantly supporting MPA PROs upon their return to work. Representatives
are invited as members of the Advisory Committee.
13
Figure 3. WIO-COMPAS organizational structure
There are no application fees for the WIO-COMPAS Program. Only after an applicant is accepted into a certiication offering and becomes an oficial candidate is a fee due. Payment of the certiication fee reserves a
space in a speciic certiication offering. A limited number of scholarships are sometimes available. Certiication
• Certiication Fee – amount will depend on the extent the core costs have been covered by funds raised.
Mode of payment will be communicated by the Secretariat upon admitted into the Program. • Renewal Fee – USD 25
The certiication fee covers: • Administrative costs associated with reviewing applications and enrolment
• Assessment costs including resource materials, professional development programs and a personal assessor
for Levels 1 and 2, and the assessment panel for Level 3 • Accommodation and board for the Assessment Event
• Certiication awards and transcripts
Fees do
NOT include costs associated with:
• Communicating with the Secretariat andor assessors via phone, internet or postal carrier • Personal time and resources to conduct the assessment activities
• Candidate’s travel to and from the assessment event • Personal expenses or daily subsistence allowance
• Visa costs and other travel related costs to the Assessment Event venue
Scholarships
A limited number of partial scholarships are sometimes available for a select number of candidates and are based on inancial need. Contact the WIO-COMPAS Secretariat for details and scholarship application forms.
The amount of scholarship funding available and the rules related to awarding that funding will vary based on the donors that have provided the funding.
3.3 Application Process
The application process is thorough and extensive for two reasons. One is to accurately conirm an applicant’s education, employment and professional experience related to the level of certiication requested. The other is to
achieve eficiency in guiding MPA professionals to the appropriate level of certiication before entering the Program. The Secretariat serves as gatekeeper to the Program. They send out applications, and they provide WIO-
COMPAS information to MPA institutions and professionals to assist them in understanding the Program levels, competences and process. The application review process is as follows:
1. Secretariat screens applications for completeness and entry requirements 2. If approved, a personal assessor is assigned to the applicant to conirm the appropriate type and level of
experience related to the competences 3. Assessors may contact the individual to conduct a telephone conversation to clarify issues arising from
the application 4. Assessors submit their acceptance recommendations onto the Program to the Secretariat
5. If the number of qualiied applications exceeds the number of spaces available for the certiication offering to which they have applied, the Secretariat follows the WIO-COMPAS selection policy, which ranks
applicants by the following factors:
14
