50
6. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TRACKING TABLE
The following table will be used to track targets quarterly, annually and over Life-of-Project and compare progress relative to targets set. This will feed into the KML system for determining if targets need to be adjusted or whether activities or objectives need to be adjusted to achieve
the initial targets set. This double loop learning approach is the basis for adaptive management
Table 3. Performance Indicator Tracking Table
No. Indicator
Baseline YEAR ONE
YEAR 2 YEAR 3
YEAR 4 YEAR 5
LOP Target FY 2015
FY 2016 FY 2017
FY 2018 FY 2019
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l v
s. T
a rg
et
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l v
s. T
a rg
et
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l v
s. T
a rg
et
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l v
s. T
a rg
et
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l v
s. T
a rg
et
Goal: Rebuild targeted fish stocks via adoption of sustainable practices and exploitation levels
1 Number of hectares in areas of biological
significance andor natural resource showing improved biophysical conditions
as a result of USG assistance EG 4.8.1- 1
Baseline established
Baselines established
small pelagics Tracked
Tracked 610,900
Small pelagics
610,900
marine
1.a Biomass to produce MSY B
msy
Baseline established
Baseline established
Stable or increasing
assumes a closed
season put in place in
Year2 Stable or
increasing Stable or
increasing
51
1.b Fishing Mortality at MSY F
msy
Baseline established
Baseline established
Stable or decreasing
Stable or decreasing
Stable or increasing
2 Number of direct project beneficiaries
number, the percentage of which are female percent IDA Core Indicator
Goal level indicator from Ghana CDCS Baselines
established for processors and
fishermen tracked
130,000 small
pelagic mgt.
assumes benefits
from adoption
of closed season
tracked 130,000
marine fishers
processors and markers
23 women
IR1: POLICY: Strengthened enabling environment for marine resources governance
3 Number of agricultural and
nutritional enabling environment policies completing the following
processessteps of development as a result of USG assistance in each case:
fish act analysis fish act
drafting public consult
Fish act submitted
Fish Act approved
Fish Act implemented
6 Fish act
Child labor Small pelagic
Demersal plan Pra Plan
Ankobra plan Small pelagics
analysis small pelagic
plan drafted public consult
small pelagic
plan submitted
small pelagic plan
approved small pelagic
plan implemented
52
FTF 4.5.124 1.Analysis
2.Stakeholder consultationpublic debate
3.Drafting or revision 4.Approval legislative or regulatory
5.Full and effective implementation
child labour analysis
child labour draft of
recommended action
Demersal plan analysis
Demersal plan drafted
public consult
Demersal plan
submitted Demersal
plan approved
CB plans for Pra
submitted CB plans for
Ankobra submitted
53
No. Indicator
Baseline YEAR ONE
YEAR 2 YEAR 3
YEAR 4 YEAR 5
LOP Target FY 2015
FY 2016 FY 2017
FY 2018 FY 2019
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l vs
. T ar
ge t
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l vs
. T ar
ge t
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l vs
. T ar
ge t
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l vs
. T ar
ge t
T a
rg et
A ct
u a
l A
ctu a
l vs
. T ar
ge t
IR2: SCIENCE RESEARCH: Increased use of science and applied research to inform decision-making, law enforcement and the implementation of management plans
4 Number of institutions with improved
capacity to develop and implement managed access fisheries
management plans SNV-Baseline
established for 7 groups:
FON,HM,DAA, DG, CEWEFIA,
GCFC, FA
CRC qualitative baselines for 9
UCC-CCM, UCC-DFAS,
MSC , FEU, research, post-
harvest, marine divisions of
Fisheries Commission
2 RCCs Ongoing,
no new groups
Ongoing, no new
groups Ongoing,
no new groups
Ongoing, no new
groups 16
54
No. Indicator
Baseline YEAR ONE
YEAR 2 YEAR 3
YEAR 4 YEAR 5
LOP Target FY 2015
Kategori