101 718
819
819 4308
x 100 = 19.01
Intermediate_rank_3 I
Taxon_id B
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
101 718
819
819 4308
x 100 = 19.01
Intermediate_rank_3 I
Genus D Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 101
718 819
819 4308
x 100 = 19.01
Intermediate_rank_3 I
Species E Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 101
718 819
819 4308
x 100 = 19.01
4.3.5 Multi-valued table for Table AE_J
Table 24. Multi-table scheme of table AE_J total instances Intermediate_rank_4
J U_id A
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
157 657
814
814 3942
x 100 = 20.65
74
Intermediate_rank_4 J
Taxon_id B
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
157 657
814
814 3942
x 100 = 20.65
Intermediate_rank_4 J
Genus D Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 157
657 814
814 3942
x 100 = 20.65
Intermediate_rank_4 J
Species E Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 157
657 814
814 3942
x 100 = 20.65
4.3.6 Multi-valued table for Table AE_K
Table 25. Multi-table scheme of table AE_K total instances Intermediate_rank_5
K U_id A
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
217 502
719
719 3012
x 100 = 23.87
75
Intermediate_rank_5 K
Taxon_id B
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
217 502
719
719 3012
x 100 = 23.87
Intermediate_rank_5 K
Genus D Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 217
502 719
719 3012
x 100 = 23.87
Intermediate_rank_5 K
Species E Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 217
502 719
719 3012
x 100 = 23.87
4.3.7 Multi-valued table for Table AE_L
Table 26. Multi-table scheme of table AE_L total instances Intermediate_rank_6
L U_id A
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
92 140
232
232 840
x 100 = 27.62
76
Intermediate_rank_6 L
Taxon_id B
Size of Proxy Map
Percentage of Space Requirement
92 140
232
232 840
x 100 = 27.62
Intermediate_rank_6 L
Genus D Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 92
140 232
232 840
x 100 = 27.62
Intermediate_rank_6 L
Species E Size of
Proxy Map Percentage of Space
Requirement 92
140 232
232 840
x 100 = 27.62
4.4
Conclusions
This chapter provides us with summary of results from TANE algorithms. It has been divided into ranges categories to make ease of to predict the accuracy of FDs discovery.
From here we can say that, if the produced G3 value is 0 or nearly zero, than the accuracy of FDs are good or ~100. In the next chapter we are going to discuss about the results
has presented in this chapter.
77
CHAPTER 5
RESULTS ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS
5.1 Background