Multi-valued table for Table AE_J Multi-valued table for Table AE_K Multi-valued table for Table AE_L

101 718 819 819 4308 x 100 = 19.01 Intermediate_rank_3 I Taxon_id B Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 101 718 819 819 4308 x 100 = 19.01 Intermediate_rank_3 I Genus D Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 101 718 819 819 4308 x 100 = 19.01 Intermediate_rank_3 I Species E Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 101 718 819 819 4308 x 100 = 19.01

4.3.5 Multi-valued table for Table AE_J

Table 24. Multi-table scheme of table AE_J total instances Intermediate_rank_4 J U_id A Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 157 657 814 814 3942 x 100 = 20.65 74 Intermediate_rank_4 J Taxon_id B Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 157 657 814 814 3942 x 100 = 20.65 Intermediate_rank_4 J Genus D Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 157 657 814 814 3942 x 100 = 20.65 Intermediate_rank_4 J Species E Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 157 657 814 814 3942 x 100 = 20.65

4.3.6 Multi-valued table for Table AE_K

Table 25. Multi-table scheme of table AE_K total instances Intermediate_rank_5 K U_id A Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 217 502 719 719 3012 x 100 = 23.87 75 Intermediate_rank_5 K Taxon_id B Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 217 502 719 719 3012 x 100 = 23.87 Intermediate_rank_5 K Genus D Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 217 502 719 719 3012 x 100 = 23.87 Intermediate_rank_5 K Species E Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 217 502 719 719 3012 x 100 = 23.87

4.3.7 Multi-valued table for Table AE_L

Table 26. Multi-table scheme of table AE_L total instances Intermediate_rank_6 L U_id A Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 92 140 232 232 840 x 100 = 27.62 76 Intermediate_rank_6 L Taxon_id B Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 92 140 232 232 840 x 100 = 27.62 Intermediate_rank_6 L Genus D Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 92 140 232 232 840 x 100 = 27.62 Intermediate_rank_6 L Species E Size of Proxy Map Percentage of Space Requirement 92 140 232 232 840 x 100 = 27.62 4.4 Conclusions This chapter provides us with summary of results from TANE algorithms. It has been divided into ranges categories to make ease of to predict the accuracy of FDs discovery. From here we can say that, if the produced G3 value is 0 or nearly zero, than the accuracy of FDs are good or ~100. In the next chapter we are going to discuss about the results has presented in this chapter. 77 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS

5.1 Background